BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18617052)

  • 1. The effect of SpeechEasy on stuttering frequency, speech rate, and speech naturalness.
    Armson J; Kiefte M
    J Fluency Disord; 2008; 33(2):120-34. PubMed ID: 18617052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of SpeechEasy on stuttering frequency in laboratory conditions.
    Armson J; Kiefte M; Mason J; De Croos D
    J Fluency Disord; 2006; 31(2):137-52. PubMed ID: 16753207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effectiveness of SpeechEasy during situations of daily living.
    O'Donnell JJ; Armson J; Kiefte M
    J Fluency Disord; 2008; 33(2):99-119. PubMed ID: 18617051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigations of the impact of altered auditory feedback in-the-ear devices on the speech of people who stutter: initial fitting and 4-month follow-up.
    Stuart A; Kalinowski J; Rastatter M; Saltuklaroglu T; Dayalu V
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2004; 39(1):93-113. PubMed ID: 14660188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of the SpeechEasy on objective and perceived aspects of stuttering: a 6-month, phase I clinical trial in naturalistic environments.
    Pollard R; Ellis JB; Finan D; Ramig PR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Apr; 52(2):516-33. PubMed ID: 18695013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term effectiveness of the SpeechEasy fluency-enhancement device.
    Gallop RF; Runyan CM
    J Fluency Disord; 2012 Dec; 37(4):334-43. PubMed ID: 23218216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of speech rate on stuttering frequency, phonated intervals, speech effort, and speech naturalness during chorus reading.
    Davidow JH; Ingham RJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(2):202-16. PubMed ID: 23273708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The SpeechEasy device in stuttering and nonstuttering adults: fluency effects while speaking and reading.
    Foundas AL; Mock JR; Corey DM; Golob EJ; Conture EG
    Brain Lang; 2013 Aug; 126(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 23712191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Immediate effects of AAF devices on the characteristics of stuttering: a clinical analysis.
    Unger JP; Glück CW; Cholewa J
    J Fluency Disord; 2012 Jun; 37(2):122-34. PubMed ID: 22531287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Post-treatment speech naturalness of comprehensive stuttering program clients and differences in ratings among listener groups.
    Teshima S; Langevin M; Hagler P; Kully D
    J Fluency Disord; 2010 Mar; 35(1):44-58. PubMed ID: 20412982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech effort measurement and stuttering: investigating the chorus reading effect.
    Ingham RJ; Warner A; Byrd A; Cotton J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Jun; 49(3):660-70. PubMed ID: 16787903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigations of the impact of altered auditory feedback in-the-ear devices on the speech of people who stutter: one-year follow-up.
    Stuart A; Kalinowski J; Saltuklaroglu T; Guntupalli VK
    Disabil Rehabil; 2006 Jun; 28(12):757-65. PubMed ID: 16754573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relationship between mental health disorders and treatment outcomes among adults who stutter.
    Iverach L; Jones M; O'Brian S; Block S; Lincoln M; Harrison E; Hewat S; Cream A; Menzies RG; Packman A; Onslow M
    J Fluency Disord; 2009 Mar; 34(1):29-43. PubMed ID: 19500713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech motor correlates of treatment-related changes in stuttering severity and speech naturalness.
    Tasko SM; McClean MD; Runyan CM
    J Commun Disord; 2007; 40(1):42-65. PubMed ID: 16765980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The perception of speech naturalness of post-therapeutic and altered auditory feedback speech of adults with mild and severe stuttering.
    Stuart A; Kalinowski J
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2004; 56(6):347-57. PubMed ID: 15557773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of self-generated synchronous and asynchronous visual speech feedback on overt stuttering frequency.
    Snyder GJ; Hough MS; Blanchet P; Ivy LJ; Waddell D
    J Commun Disord; 2009; 42(3):235-44. PubMed ID: 19304293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The speech naturalness of people who stutter speaking under delayed auditory feedback as perceived by different groups of listeners.
    Van Borsel J; Eeckhout H
    J Fluency Disord; 2008 Sep; 33(3):241-51. PubMed ID: 18762064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized clinical trial: the use of SpeechEasy® in stuttering treatment.
    Ritto AP; Juste FS; Stuart A; Kalinowski J; de Andrade CR
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2016 Nov; 51(6):769-774. PubMed ID: 27271500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of reading with reversed speech on frequency of stuttering in adults.
    Rami MK; Diederich E
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Apr; 100(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 15974349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech outcomes of a prolonged-speech treatment for stuttering.
    Onslow M; Costa L; Andrews C; Harrison E; Packman A
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Aug; 39(4):734-49. PubMed ID: 8844554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.