These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18617106)

  • 1. . Facial attractiveness: ranking of end-of-treatment facial photographs by pairs of Chinese and US orthodontists.
    Xu TM; Korn EL; Liu Y; Oh HS; Lee KH; Boyd RL; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):74-84. PubMed ID: 18617106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correlations between cephalometric and photographic measurements of facial attractiveness in Chinese and US patients after orthodontic treatment.
    Oh HS; Korn EL; Zhang X; Liu Y; Xu T; Boyd R; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):762.e1-14; discussion 762-3. PubMed ID: 19962590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Chinese and US orthodontists' averaged evaluations of "facial attractiveness" from end-of-treatment facial photographs.
    Liu Y; Korn EL; Oh HS; Pearson H; Xu TM; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May; 135(5):621-34. PubMed ID: 19409345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of facial attractiveness from end-of-treatment facial photographs.
    Shafiee R; Korn EL; Pearson H; Boyd RL; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):500-8. PubMed ID: 18405813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlation Between Cephalometric Measures and End-of-Treatment Facial Attractiveness.
    Yu XN; Bai D; Feng X; Liu YH; Chen WJ; Li S; Han GL; Jiang RP; Xu TM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 27(2):405-9. PubMed ID: 26872281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability assessment and correlation analysis of evaluating orthodontic treatment outcome in Chinese patients.
    Song GY; Zhao ZH; Ding Y; Bai YX; Wang L; He H; Shen G; Li WR; Baumrind S; Geng Z; Xu TM
    Int J Oral Sci; 2014 Mar; 6(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 24136673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of facial attractiveness for patients with malocclusion: a machine-learning technique employing Procrustes.
    Yu X; Liu B; Pei Y; Xu T
    Angle Orthod; 2014 May; 84(3):410-6. PubMed ID: 24090123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of the posed smile in overall facial esthetics.
    Havens DC; McNamara JA; Sigler LM; Baccetti T
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Mar; 80(2):322-8. PubMed ID: 19905858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are ratings of dentofacial attractiveness influenced by dentofacial midline discrepancies?
    Shyagali TR; Chandralekha B; Bhayya DP; Kumar S; Balasubramanyam G
    Aust Orthod J; 2008 Nov; 24(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 19113072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of facial components on the attractiveness of face: A perception-based study.
    Parul P; Kumar M; Goyal M; Mishra S; Shaha K; Abrar M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Nov; 162(5):e218-e229. PubMed ID: 36031510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The decision to extract: part II. Analysis of clinicians' stated reasons for extraction.
    Baumrind S; Korn EL; Boyd RL; Maxwell R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Apr; 109(4):393-402. PubMed ID: 8638581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A measuring system for facial aesthetics in Caucasian adolescents: reproducibility and validity.
    Kiekens RM; Maltha JC; van 't Hof MA; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 16009665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Facial-profile attractiveness changes in adult patients treated with the Herbst appliance.
    von Bremen J; Erbe C; Pancherz H; Ruf S
    J Orofac Orthop; 2014 May; 75(3):167-74. PubMed ID: 24825829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Professional assessment of facial profile attractiveness.
    Soh J; Chew MT; Wong HB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 16102405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Esthetic evaluation of Asian-Chinese profiles from a white perspective.
    Chan EK; Soh J; Petocz P; Darendeliler MA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):532-8. PubMed ID: 18405817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Smile esthetics: perception and comparison of treated and untreated smiles.
    Işiksal E; Hazar S; Akyalçin S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jan; 129(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 16443472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of facial components in class III malocclusion esthetic perception of orthodontists, patients, and laypersons.
    Fastuca R; Beccarini T; Rossi O; Zecca PA; Caprioglio A
    J Orofac Orthop; 2022 Jan; 83(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 33929556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptions of dental esthetics of Asian orthodontists and laypersons.
    Soh J; Chew MT; Chan YH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 16905060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attractiveness of facial profiles as rated by individuals with different levels of education.
    Hönn M; Dietz K; Eiselt ML; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Jan; 69(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 18213458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlation between objective and subjective evaluation of profile in bimaxillary protrusion patients after orthodontic treatment.
    Huang YP; Li WR
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):690-8. PubMed ID: 25347046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.