These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18617106)

  • 21. Facial esthetic outcome of functional followed by fixed orthodontic treatment of class II division 1 patients.
    Zouloumi ME; Tsiouli K; Psomiadis S; Kolokitha OE; Topouzelis N; Gkantidis N
    Prog Orthod; 2019 Nov; 20(1):42. PubMed ID: 31761963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Facial attractiveness of skeletal Class II patients before and after mandibular advancement surgery as perceived by people with different backgrounds.
    Ng D; De Silva RK; Smit R; De Silva H; Farella M
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Aug; 35(4):515-20. PubMed ID: 22573907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of treatment on facial attractiveness.
    Phillips C; Trentini CJ; Douvartzidis N
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1992 Jun; 50(6):590-4. PubMed ID: 1593319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of lateral cephalometric radiography in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.
    Durão AR; Alqerban A; Ferreira AP; Jacobs R
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Mar; 85(2):206-10. PubMed ID: 25191839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Differences in facial profile and dental esthetic perceptions between young adults and orthodontists.
    Yin L; Jiang M; Chen W; Smales RJ; Wang Q; Tang L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jun; 145(6):750-6. PubMed ID: 24880845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of White and Chinese perception of esthetic Chinese lip position.
    Chong HT; Thea KW; Descallar J; Chen Y; Dalci O; Wong R; Darendeliler MA
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Mar; 84(2):246-53. PubMed ID: 23914821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of the gingival display on posed smile with different facial forms: a comparison of dentists and patients concepts.
    Akhare PJ; Daga A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 23422598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Evaluation of lower facial esthetics in females with different skeletal patterns].
    Zhang KK; Yang SY; Geng YD; Xiao WW; Peng HZ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Jun; 55(6):388-393. PubMed ID: 32486568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Long-term profile attractiveness of patients with Class I and II malocclusion treated with and without extractions: A 35-year follow-up.
    Bravo Vallejo G; Alcaraz Ros GD; Peloso RM; Gambardela-Tkacz CM; Cotrin P; Freitas KMS; de Freitas MR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2024 May; 165(5):513-519. PubMed ID: 38231168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluations of the facial attractiveness of young women with severe maxillary anterior crowding by orthodontists and laypeople with and without orthodontic treatment experience in Japan.
    Yabe A; Ikoma M; Arai K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Jun; 159(6):750-757. PubMed ID: 33888377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Smile attractiveness in class III patients after orthodontic camouflage or orthognathic surgery.
    Reis GM; de Freitas DS; Oliveira RC; de Oliveira RCG; Pinzan-Vercelino CRM; Freitas KMS; Valarelli FP
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Dec; 25(12):6791-6797. PubMed ID: 33959816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Maxillary arch width and buccal corridor changes with orthodontic treatment. Part 2: attractiveness of the frontal facial smile in extraction and nonextraction outcomes.
    Meyer AH; Woods MG; Manton DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):296-304. PubMed ID: 24582021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
    Maple JR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Larsen PE; Shanker S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):690-6; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Significance of the soft tissue profile on facial esthetics.
    Spyropoulos MN; Halazonetis DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):464-71. PubMed ID: 11343017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of premolar extractions on long-term adult facial aesthetics and apparent age.
    Janson G; Junqueira CH; Mendes LM; Garib DG
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Jun; 38(3):272-80. PubMed ID: 26070924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Factors influencing the orthodontic treatment plan in Class II malocclusion.
    Alsaggaf DH; Afify AR; Zawawi KH; Alsulaimani FF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Jun; 161(6):829-837.e1. PubMed ID: 35094890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Orthodontists' and laypersons' aesthetic assessment of Class III subjects referred for orthognathic surgery.
    Fabré M; Mossaz C; Christou P; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 19395371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Attractiveness assessment by orthodontists and laypeople judging female profile modifications of Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Kalin K; Iskender SY; Kuitert R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Aug; 160(2):276-282. PubMed ID: 34006425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Panel perception of facial attractiveness.
    Kerr WJ; O'Donnell JM
    Br J Orthod; 1990 Nov; 17(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 2285698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Professionals' and laypersons' appreciation of various options for Class III surgical correction.
    Fabré M; Mossaz C; Christou P; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 19901039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.