368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18617110)
21. A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls.
van Vlijmen OJ; Maal TJ; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19583759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Validation of a novel semi-automated method for three-dimensional surface rendering of condyles using cone beam computed tomography data.
Xi T; van Loon B; Fudalej P; Bergé S; Swennen G; Maal T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Aug; 42(8):1023-9. PubMed ID: 23528746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of cephalometric landmark identification on CBCT multiplanar and 3D reconstructions.
Neiva MB; Soares ÁC; Lisboa Cde O; Vilella Ode V; Motta AT
Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 24713068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Reliability and accuracy of three imaging software packages used for 3D analysis of the upper airway on cone beam computed tomography images.
Chen H; van Eijnatten M; Wolff J; de Lange J; van der Stelt PF; Lobbezoo F; Aarab G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Aug; 46(6):20170043. PubMed ID: 28467118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Precision and accuracy of suggested maxillary and mandibular landmarks with cone-beam computed tomography for regional superimpositions: An in vitro study.
Lemieux G; Carey JP; Flores-Mir C; Secanell M; Hart A; Lagravère MO
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jan; 149(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 26718380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison between full face and hemifacial CBCT cephalograms in clinically symmetrical patients: a pilot study.
Junqueira CH; Janson G; Junqueira MH; Mendes LM; Favilla EE; Garib DG
Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(2):83-9. PubMed ID: 25992992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The validity of transverse intermaxillary analysis by traditional PA cephalometry compared with cone-beam computed tomography.
Cheung G; Goonewardene MS; Islam SM; Murray K; Koong B
Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 23785942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Cephalometry Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans.
Cassetta M; Altieri F; Di Giorgio R; Silvestri A
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 26(4):e311-5. PubMed ID: 26080244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Accuracy of assessing the mandibular canal on cone-beam computed tomography: a validation study.
Gerlach NL; Ghaeminia H; Bronkhorst EM; Bergé SJ; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 72(4):666-71. PubMed ID: 24480773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Vertical bone measurements from cone beam computed tomography images using different software packages.
Vasconcelos TV; Neves FS; Moraes LA; Freitas DQ
Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25715034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Accuracy of mesiodistal root angulation projected by cone-beam computed tomographic panoramic-like images.
Van Elslande D; Heo G; Flores-Mir C; Carey J; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4 Suppl):S94-9. PubMed ID: 20381767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Accuracy and reliability of linear measurements using 3-dimensional computed tomographic imaging software for Le Fort I Osteotomy.
Gaia BF; Pinheiro LR; Umetsubo OS; Santos O; Costa FF; Cavalcanti MG
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Mar; 52(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 24456609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reliability of anatomic structures as landmarks in three-dimensional cephalometric analysis using CBCT.
Naji P; Alsufyani NA; Lagravère MO
Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):762-72. PubMed ID: 24364751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) - generated frontal cephalograms.
Kim SJ; Park SB; Kim YI; Cho BH; Hwang DS
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):e331-6. PubMed ID: 22444351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Morphometric analysis - Cone beam computed tomography to predict bone quality and quantity.
Hohlweg-Majert B; Metzger MC; Kummer T; Schulze D
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 39(5):330-4. PubMed ID: 21030266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison between two-dimensional and midsagittal three-dimensional cephalometric measurements of dry human skulls.
Damstra J; Fourie Z; Ren Y
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 49(5):392-5. PubMed ID: 20615593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Orthodontic soft-tissue parameters: a comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and the 3dMD imaging system.
Metzger TE; Kula KS; Eckert GJ; Ghoneima AA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):672-81. PubMed ID: 24182583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of linear and angular measurements using two-dimensional conventional methods and three-dimensional cone beam CT images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program in vivo.
Oz U; Orhan K; Abe N
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Dec; 40(8):492-500. PubMed ID: 22065798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Multimodal registration of three-dimensional maxillodental cone beam CT and photogrammetry data over time.
Bolandzadeh N; Bischof W; Flores-Mir C; Boulanger P
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(2):22027087. PubMed ID: 22842636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Reproducibility of landmark identification in the jaw and teeth on 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography images.
Fuyamada M; Nawa H; Shibata M; Yoshida K; Kise Y; Katsumata A; Ariji E; Goto S
Angle Orthod; 2011 Sep; 81(5):843-9. PubMed ID: 21568647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
