These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Reduction of operator radiation dose by a pelvic lead shield during cardiac catheterization by radial access: comparison with femoral access. Lange HW; von Boetticher H JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Apr; 5(4):445-9. PubMed ID: 22516403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of radiation dose to operator between transradial and transfemoral coronary angiography with optimised radiation protection: a phantom study. Liu H; Jin Z; Jing L Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Mar; 158(4):412-20. PubMed ID: 24162374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of operator radiation exposure with optimized radiation protection devices during coronary angiograms and ad hoc percutaneous coronary interventions by radial and femoral routes. Brasselet C; Blanpain T; Tassan-Mangina S; Deschildre A; Duval S; Vitry F; Gaillot-Petit N; Clément JP; Metz D Eur Heart J; 2008 Jan; 29(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 17999984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiation exposure and vascular access site. Hamon M; Sourgounis A Eur Heart J; 2008 Apr; 29(7):954; author reply 954-5. PubMed ID: 18308692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiation safety: Patients First "Where Is the Radiation Needle on the Ethical Compass?". Chambers CE; Miller DL Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jun; 85(7):1171-2. PubMed ID: 25999276 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comments on "A randomized study comparing the use of a pelvic lead shield during trans-radial interventions: Threefold decrease in radiation to the operator but double exposure to the patient". Jones AK Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 86(5):958-9. PubMed ID: 25914315 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Occupational radiation exposure in femoral artery approach is higher than radial artery approach during coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention. Kim JS; Lee BK; Ryu DR; Chun K; Kwon HS; Nam SR; Kim DI; Lee SY; Jeong JO; Bae JW; Park JS; Ahn Y; Chae JK; Yoon MH; Lee SH; Yoon J; Gwon HC; Choi D; Kwon SM; Roh YH; Cho BR Sci Rep; 2020 Apr; 10(1):7104. PubMed ID: 32346022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Response to comment on "a randomized study comparing the use of a pelvic lead shield during trans-radial interventions: Threefold decrease in radiation to the operator but double exposure to the patient". Roguin A; Musallam A; Rappaport B Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 86(5):960. PubMed ID: 25914301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. "Radial era," 5F femoral access coronary angiography using a novel closure device: preliminary data. Anastasius M; Lowe HC Int J Cardiol; 2014 Apr; 173(1):124-5. PubMed ID: 24636543 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Radial artery access as a predictor of increased radiation exposure during a diagnostic cardiac catheterization procedure. Mercuri M; Mehta S; Xie C; Valettas N; Velianou JL; Natarajan MK JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Mar; 4(3):347-52. PubMed ID: 21435615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diffusion of innovations and adoption of transradial intervention. Abbott JD Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jun; 6(3):199-200. PubMed ID: 23780292 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A quarter century & change of directions: femoral to radial approach? Parikh KH Indian Heart J; 2010; 62(3):191. PubMed ID: 21275289 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of operator radiation exposure with optimized radiation protection devices during coronary angiograms and ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention by radial and femoral routes. Patrizi R; Sciahbasi A; Summaria F; Lioy E Eur Heart J; 2009 Apr; 30(7):866. PubMed ID: 19151079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigation of occupational radiation exposure during interventional cardiac catheterisations performed via radial artery. Goni H; Papadopoulou D; Yakoumakis E; Stratigis N; Benos J; Siriopoulou V; Makri T; Georgiou E Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):107-10. PubMed ID: 16461487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of a real-time radiation monitoring device on operator radiation exposure during cardiac catheterization: the radiation reduction during cardiac catheterization using real-time monitoring study. Christopoulos G; Papayannis AC; Alomar M; Kotsia A; Michael TT; Rangan BV; Roesle M; Shorrock D; Makke L; Layne R; Grabarkewitz R; Haagen D; Maragkoudakis S; Mohammad A; Sarode K; Cipher DJ; Chambers CE; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Dec; 7(6):744-50. PubMed ID: 25423958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comment on 'Comparison of operator radiation exposure with optimized radiation protection devices during coronary angiograms and ad hoc percutaneous coronary interventions by radial and femoral routes'. Agostoni P; Testa L; Biondi-Zoccai GG Eur Heart J; 2008 Nov; 29(22):2820-1. PubMed ID: 18826985 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. An alarm for radialists from its evangelist. Saito S Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 Jan; 67(1):17. PubMed ID: 16331695 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]