162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18618724)
1. KOC (K homology domain containing protein overexpressed in cancer) and S100A4-protein immunoreactivity improves the diagnostic sensitivity of biliary brushing cytology for diagnosing pancreaticobiliary malignancies.
Ligato S; Zhao H; Mandich D; Cartun RW
Diagn Cytopathol; 2008 Aug; 36(8):561-7. PubMed ID: 18618724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Immunocytochemistry for Claudin-18 and Maspin in biliary brushing cytology increases the accuracy of diagnosing pancreatobiliary malignancies.
Tokumitsu T; Sato Y; Yamashita A; Moriguchi-Goto S; Kondo K; Nanashima A; Asada Y
Cytopathology; 2017 Apr; 28(2):116-121. PubMed ID: 27527114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Expression of K homology domain containing protein overexpressed in cancer in pancreatic FNA for diagnosing adenocarcinoma of pancreas.
Zhao H; Mandich D; Cartun RW; Ligato S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Nov; 35(11):700-4. PubMed ID: 17924416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Significance of atypia in pancreatic and bile duct brushings: follow-up analysis of the categories atypical and suspicious for malignancy.
Chadwick BE; Layfield LJ; Witt BL; Schmidt RL; Cox RN; Adler DG
Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Apr; 42(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 24167030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Expression of K homology domain containing protein (KOC) in pancreatic cytology with corresponding histology.
Toll AD; Witkiewicz AK; Bibbo M
Acta Cytol; 2009; 53(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 19365962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endoscopic brush cytology from the biliary duct system is still valuable.
Eiholm S; Thielsen P; Kromann-Andersen H
Dan Med J; 2013 Jul; 60(7):A4656. PubMed ID: 23809967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Utility of anti-L523S antibody in the diagnosis of benign and malignant serous effusions.
Hanley KZ; Facik MS; Bourne PA; Yang Q; Spaulding BO; Bonfiglio TA; Xu H
Cancer; 2008 Feb; 114(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 18098206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. DNA image analysis combined with routine cytology improves diagnostic sensitivity of common bile duct brushing.
Krishnamurthy S; Katz RL; Shumate A; Strohlein K; Khanna A; Tucker SL; Raijman I; Lahoti S
Cancer; 2001 Jun; 93(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 11391612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Routine brush cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for assessment of pancreatobiliary strictures.
Smoczynski M; Jablonska A; Matyskiel A; Lakomy J; Dubowik M; Marek I; Biernat W; Limon J
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 22078103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sensitivity of alternative testing for pancreaticobiliary cancer: a 10-y review of the literature.
Burnett AS; Bailey J; Oliver JB; Ahlawat S; Chokshi RJ
J Surg Res; 2014 Aug; 190(2):535-47. PubMed ID: 24969546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic Performance of Bile Duct Brush Cytology with Risk of Malignancy of Standardized Categories in the Wake of World Health Organization Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Rath A; Pradeep I; Nigam JS
Acta Cytol; 2023; 67(6):639-649. PubMed ID: 37879315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of routine cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of malignant bile duct strictures.
Kipp BR; Stadheim LM; Halling SA; Pochron NL; Harmsen S; Nagorney DM; Sebo TJ; Therneau TM; Gores GJ; de Groen PC; Baron TH; Levy MJ; Halling KC; Roberts LR
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1675-81. PubMed ID: 15330900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Brush cytology of the biliary tract: retrospective study of 278 cases with histopathologic correlation.
Govil H; Reddy V; Kluskens L; Treaba D; Massarani-Wafai R; Selvaggi S; Gattuso P
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 May; 26(5):273-7. PubMed ID: 11992366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary malignancy by detection of minichromosome maintenance protein 5 in biliary brush cytology.
Keane MG; Huggett MT; Chapman MH; Johnson GJ; Webster GJ; Thorburn D; Mackay J; Pereira SP
Br J Cancer; 2017 Jan; 116(3):349-355. PubMed ID: 28081547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In situ hybridization for telomerase RNA in routine cytologic brushings for the diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary malignancies.
Morales CP; Burdick JS; Saboorian MH; Wright WE; Shay JW
Gastrointest Endosc; 1998 Oct; 48(4):402-5. PubMed ID: 9786114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of microRNA expression in brush cytology specimens improves the diagnosis of pancreatobiliary cancer.
Le N; Fillinger J; Szanyi S; Wichmann B; Nagy ZB; Ivády G; Burai M; Tarpay Á; Pozsár J; Pap Á; Molnár B; Csuka O; Bak M; Tulassay Z; Szmola R
Pancreatology; 2019 Sep; 19(6):873-879. PubMed ID: 31400934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Targeted multiprobe fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis for elucidation of inconclusive pancreatobiliary cytology.
Vlajnic T; Somaini G; Savic S; Barascud A; Grilli B; Herzog M; Obermann EC; Holmes BJ; Ali SZ; Degen L; Bubendorf L
Cancer Cytopathol; 2014 Aug; 122(8):627-34. PubMed ID: 24753508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of flow cytometry for DNA content and brush cytology for detection of malignancy in pancreaticobiliary strictures.
Ryan ME; Baldauf MC
Gastrointest Endosc; 1994; 40(2 Pt 1):133-9. PubMed ID: 8013809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biliary brush cytology for the diagnosis of malignancy: a single center experience.
Stoos-Veić T; Bilić B; Kaić G; Ostović KT; Babić Z; Kujundzić M
Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):139-43. PubMed ID: 20432742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pancreatic and bile duct brushing cytology in 1000 cases: review of findings and comparison of preparation methods.
Volmar KE; Vollmer RT; Routbort MJ; Creager AJ
Cancer; 2006 Aug; 108(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 16541448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
