646 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18619474)
1. Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to reward-related cues: Implications for addiction.
Flagel SB; Akil H; Robinson TE
Neuropharmacology; 2009; 56 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):139-48. PubMed ID: 18619474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantifying individual variation in the propensity to attribute incentive salience to reward cues.
Meyer PJ; Lovic V; Saunders BT; Yager LM; Flagel SB; Morrow JD; Robinson TE
PLoS One; 2012; 7(6):e38987. PubMed ID: 22761718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to a reward-related cue: influence on cocaine sensitization.
Flagel SB; Watson SJ; Akil H; Robinson TE
Behav Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 186(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 17719099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A food predictive cue must be attributed with incentive salience for it to induce c-fos mRNA expression in cortico-striatal-thalamic brain regions.
Flagel SB; Cameron CM; Pickup KN; Watson SJ; Akil H; Robinson TE
Neuroscience; 2011 Nov; 196():80-96. PubMed ID: 21945724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Individual variation in the propensity to attribute incentive salience to an appetitive cue predicts the propensity to attribute motivational salience to an aversive cue.
Morrow JD; Maren S; Robinson TE
Behav Brain Res; 2011 Jun; 220(1):238-43. PubMed ID: 21316397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the motivational properties of reward cues: Individual differences.
Robinson TE; Yager LM; Cogan ES; Saunders BT
Neuropharmacology; 2014 Jan; 76 Pt B(0 0):450-9. PubMed ID: 23748094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Which cue to 'want'? Opioid stimulation of central amygdala makes goal-trackers show stronger goal-tracking, just as sign-trackers show stronger sign-tracking.
DiFeliceantonio AG; Berridge KC
Behav Brain Res; 2012 May; 230(2):399-408. PubMed ID: 22391118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Neural Activity in the Ventral Pallidum Encodes Variation in the Incentive Value of a Reward Cue.
Ahrens AM; Meyer PJ; Ferguson LM; Robinson TE; Aldridge JW
J Neurosci; 2016 Jul; 36(30):7957-70. PubMed ID: 27466340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dissociating the predictive and incentive motivational properties of reward-related cues through the study of individual differences.
Robinson TE; Flagel SB
Biol Psychiatry; 2009 May; 65(10):869-73. PubMed ID: 18930184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A cocaine cue acts as an incentive stimulus in some but not others: implications for addiction.
Saunders BT; Robinson TE
Biol Psychiatry; 2010 Apr; 67(8):730-6. PubMed ID: 20045508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Individual differences in anticipatory activity to food rewards predict cue-induced appetitive 50-kHz calls in rats.
Brenes JC; Schwarting RK
Physiol Behav; 2015 Oct; 149():107-18. PubMed ID: 25992480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A classically conditioned cocaine cue acquires greater control over motivated behavior in rats prone to attribute incentive salience to a food cue.
Yager LM; Robinson TE
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2013 Mar; 226(2):217-28. PubMed ID: 23093382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Neurons of the Ventral Tegmental Area Encode Individual Differences in Motivational "Wanting" for Reward Cues.
Ferguson LM; Ahrens AM; Longyear LG; Aldridge JW
J Neurosci; 2020 Nov; 40(46):8951-8963. PubMed ID: 33046552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Individual variation in the motivational properties of cocaine.
Saunders BT; Robinson TE
Neuropsychopharmacology; 2011 Jul; 36(8):1668-76. PubMed ID: 21471956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Subanesthetic ketamine decreases the incentive-motivational value of reward-related cues.
Fitzpatrick CJ; Morrow JD
J Psychopharmacol; 2017 Jan; 31(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 27649773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inhibition of Dopamine Neurons Prevents Incentive Value Encoding of a Reward Cue: With Revelations from Deep Phenotyping.
Iglesias AG; Chiu AS; Wong J; Campus P; Li F; Liu ZN; Bhatti JK; Patel SA; Deisseroth K; Akil H; Burgess CR; Flagel SB
J Neurosci; 2023 Nov; 43(44):7376-7392. PubMed ID: 37709540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Individual differences in food cue responsivity are associated with acute and repeated cocaine-induced vocalizations, but not cue-induced vocalizations.
Tripi JA; Dent ML; Meyer PJ
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2017 Feb; 234(3):437-446. PubMed ID: 27837333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A cocaine cue is more preferred and evokes more frequency-modulated 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations in rats prone to attribute incentive salience to a food cue.
Meyer PJ; Ma ST; Robinson TE
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2012 Feb; 219(4):999-1009. PubMed ID: 21833503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Individual variation in the motivational properties of a nicotine cue: sign-trackers vs. goal-trackers.
Yager LM; Robinson TE
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2015 Sep; 232(17):3149-60. PubMed ID: 25980485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cue-induced reinstatement of food seeking in rats that differ in their propensity to attribute incentive salience to food cues.
Yager LM; Robinson TE
Behav Brain Res; 2010 Dec; 214(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 20416342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
