These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18619793)

  • 1. Registered post achieved a higher response rate than normal mail--a randomized controlled trial.
    Pedrana A; Hellard M; Giles M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 61(9):896-9. PubMed ID: 18619793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. E-mail or snail mail? Randomized controlled trial on which works better for surveys.
    Seguin R; Godwin M; MacDonald S; McCall M
    Can Fam Physician; 2004 Mar; 50():414-9. PubMed ID: 15318679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. No increase in response rate by adding a web response option to a postal population survey: a randomized trial.
    Brøgger J; Nystad W; Cappelen I; Bakke P
    J Med Internet Res; 2007 Dec; 9(5):e40. PubMed ID: 18174120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Postal surveys of physicians gave superior response rates over telephone interviews in a randomized trial.
    Hocking JS; Lim MS; Read T; Hellard M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 May; 59(5):521-4. PubMed ID: 16632141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective comparison of endoscopy patient satisfaction surveys: e-mail versus standard mail versus telephone.
    Harewood GC; Yacavone RF; Locke GR; Wiersema MJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Dec; 96(12):3312-7. PubMed ID: 11774942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electronic mail was not better than postal mail for surveying residents and faculty.
    Akl EA; Maroun N; Klocke RA; Montori V; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 58(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 15862729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Antenatal screening practice for infectious diseases by general practitioners in Australia.
    Giles ML; Pedrana A; Jones C; Garland S; Hellard M; Lewin SR
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Feb; 49(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 19281578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Response to mail surveys: effect of a request to explain refusal to participate. The ARIC Study Investigators.
    Shahar E; Bisgard KM; Folsom AR
    Epidemiology; 1993 Sep; 4(5):480-2. PubMed ID: 8399698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating telephone follow-up of a mail survey of community pharmacies.
    Westrick SC; Mount JK
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2007 Jun; 3(2):160-82. PubMed ID: 17561218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Survey response inducements for registered nurses.
    Hill CA; Fahrney K; Wheeless SC; Carson CP
    West J Nurs Res; 2006 Apr; 28(3):322-34. PubMed ID: 16585808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Initial nonresponders had an increased response rate after repeated questionnaire mailings.
    Wensing M; Schattenberg G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):959-61. PubMed ID: 16085200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of a coded postcard to maintain anonymity in a highly sensitive mail survey: cost, response rates, and bias.
    Asch DA
    Epidemiology; 1996 Sep; 7(5):550-1. PubMed ID: 8862992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. No difference demonstrated between faxed or mailed prenotification in promoting questionnaire response among family physicians: a randomized controlled trial.
    Gattellari M; Zwar N; Worthington JM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 May; 65(5):544-52. PubMed ID: 22445084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of novel communication technologies to the study of farm families: a randomized controlled trial.
    Day L; Dosman J; Hagel L; Dostaler S; Snodgrass P; Thiessen J; Brison RJ; Biem HJ; Marlenga BL; Koehncke N; Crowe T; Pahwa P; Pickett W
    Prev Med; 2008 Apr; 46(4):364-9. PubMed ID: 18061658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A very low response rate in an on-line survey of medical practitioners.
    Aitken C; Power R; Dwyer R
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2008 Jun; 32(3):288-9. PubMed ID: 18578832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a training program for device operators in the Australian Government's Point of Care Testing in General Practice Trial: issues and implications for rural and remote practices.
    Shephard MD; Mazzachi BC; Watkinson L; Shephard AK; Laurence C; Gialamas A; Bubner T
    Rural Remote Health; 2009; 9(3):1189. PubMed ID: 19689171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A monetary incentive increases postal survey response rates for pharmacists.
    Paul CL; Walsh RA; Tzelepis F
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2005 Dec; 59(12):1099-101. PubMed ID: 16286502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How to obtain excellent response rates when surveying physicians.
    Thorpe C; Ryan B; McLean SL; Burt A; Stewart M; Brown JB; Reid GJ; Harris S
    Fam Pract; 2009 Feb; 26(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 19074758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Questionnaire order significantly increased response to a postal survey sent to primary care physicians.
    Drummond FJ; Sharp L; Carsin AE; Kelleher T; Comber H
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 61(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 18177791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mode of delivery, but not questionnaire length, affected response in an epidemiological study of eating-disordered behavior.
    Mond JM; Rodgers B; Hay PJ; Owen C; Beumont PJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Nov; 57(11):1167-71. PubMed ID: 15567633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.