These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18619810)

  • 1. Reducing population stratification bias: stratum matching is better than exposure.
    Lee WC; Wang LY
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 18619810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Case-control association studies with matching and genomic controlling.
    Lee WC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Jul; 27(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 15185398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simple formulas for gauging the potential impacts of population stratification bias.
    Lee WC; Wang LY
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 167(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 17881384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Population stratification bias in the case-only study for gene-environment interactions.
    Wang LY; Lee WC
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Jul; 168(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 18497429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Use of case-parents trio for epidemiological studies of association between genetic polymorphisms and complex diseases].
    Santos JL; Pérez F; Carrasco E; Albala C
    Rev Med Chil; 2002 Nov; 130(11):1307-15. PubMed ID: 12587516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Studying the joint effects of population stratification and sampling in case-control association studies.
    Cheng KF; Lee JY; Chen JH
    Hum Hered; 2010; 69(4):254-61. PubMed ID: 20357476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Association Analysis under Population Stratification: A Two-Stage Procedure Utilizing Population- and Family-Based Analyses.
    Lin HW; Chen YH
    Hum Hered; 2010; 69(3):160-70. PubMed ID: 20029228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bias formulas for external adjustment and sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounders.
    Arah OA; Chiba Y; Greenland S
    Ann Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 18(8):637-46. PubMed ID: 18652982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robustness of case-control studies of genetic factors to population stratification: magnitude of bias and type I error.
    Khlat M; Cazes MH; Génin E; Guiguet M
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Oct; 13(10):1660-4. PubMed ID: 15466984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bias from matching on age at death or censor in nested case-control studies.
    Hein MJ; Deddens JA; Schubauer-Berigan MK
    Epidemiology; 2009 May; 20(3):330-8. PubMed ID: 19289956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating bias due to population stratification in epidemiologic studies of gene-gene or gene-environment interactions.
    Wang Y; Localio R; Rebbeck TR
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Jan; 15(1):124-32. PubMed ID: 16434597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genotypic association analysis using discordant-relative-pairs.
    Yan T; Yang YN; Cheng X; DeAngelis MM; Hoh J; Zhang H
    Ann Hum Genet; 2009 Jan; 73(1):84-94. PubMed ID: 19040657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Overcoming ecologic bias using the two-phase study design.
    Wakefield J; Haneuse SJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 167(8):908-16. PubMed ID: 18270370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Case-control association tests correcting for population stratification.
    Köhler K; Bickeböller H
    Ann Hum Genet; 2006 Jan; 70(Pt 1):98-115. PubMed ID: 16441260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of population stratification on case-control association studies. II. False-positive rates and their limiting behavior as number of subpopulations increases.
    Gorroochurn P; Hodge SE; Heiman G; Greenberg DA
    Hum Hered; 2004; 58(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 15604563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of population stratification on case-control association studies. I. Elevation in false positive rates and comparison to confounding risk ratios (a simulation study).
    Heiman GA; Hodge SE; Gorroochurn P; Zhang J; Greenberg DA
    Hum Hered; 2004; 58(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 15604562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Matching.
    Costanza MC
    Prev Med; 1995 Sep; 24(5):425-33. PubMed ID: 8524715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selection of subjects for hospital-based epidemiologic studies based on outward manifestations of disease.
    Nishioka SA; Gyorkos TW; Joseph L; Collet JP
    Clin Invest Med; 2001 Dec; 24(6):299-303. PubMed ID: 11767233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ancestry estimation and correction for population stratification in molecular epidemiologic association studies.
    Barnholtz-Sloan JS; McEvoy B; Shriver MD; Rebbeck TR
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2008 Mar; 17(3):471-7. PubMed ID: 18349264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative assessment of unobserved confounding is mandatory in nonrandomized intervention studies.
    Groenwold RH; Hak E; Hoes AW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 18619797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.