These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18621032)

  • 21. Do the eyes really have it? Dynamic allocation of attention when viewing moving faces.
    Võ ML; Smith TJ; Mital PK; Henderson JM
    J Vis; 2012 Dec; 12(13):. PubMed ID: 23211270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Congruent audiovisual speech enhances auditory attention decoding with EEG.
    Fu Z; Wu X; Chen J
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Nov; 16(6):066033. PubMed ID: 31505476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The role of facial colour and luminance in visual and audiovisual speech perception.
    McCotter MV; Jordan TR
    Perception; 2003; 32(8):921-36. PubMed ID: 14580139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Does dynamic information about the speaker's face contribute to semantic speech processing? ERP evidence.
    Hernández-Gutiérrez D; Abdel Rahman R; Martín-Loeches M; Muñoz F; Schacht A; Sommer W
    Cortex; 2018 Jul; 104():12-25. PubMed ID: 29715582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Can you McGurk yourself? Self-face and self-voice in audiovisual speech.
    Aruffo C; Shore DI
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Feb; 19(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 22033983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Eye Can Hear Clearly Now: Inverse Effectiveness in Natural Audiovisual Speech Processing Relies on Long-Term Crossmodal Temporal Integration.
    Crosse MJ; Di Liberto GM; Lalor EC
    J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 36(38):9888-95. PubMed ID: 27656026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Use of audiovisual information in speech perception by prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants: a first report.
    Lachs L; Pisoni DB; Kirk KI
    Ear Hear; 2001 Jun; 22(3):236-51. PubMed ID: 11409859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The self-advantage in visual speech processing enhances audiovisual speech recognition in noise.
    Tye-Murray N; Spehar BP; Myerson J; Hale S; Sommers MS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Aug; 22(4):1048-53. PubMed ID: 25421408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Hearing speech in noise: seeing a loud talker is better.
    Kim J; Sironic A; Davis C
    Perception; 2011; 40(7):853-62. PubMed ID: 22128557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
    Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. High visual resolution matters in audiovisual speech perception, but only for some.
    Alsius A; Wayne RV; Paré M; Munhall KG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1472-87. PubMed ID: 27150616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Language/Culture Modulates Brain and Gaze Processes in Audiovisual Speech Perception.
    Hisanaga S; Sekiyama K; Igasaki T; Murayama N
    Sci Rep; 2016 Oct; 6():35265. PubMed ID: 27734953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Hearing-impaired listeners show increased audiovisual benefit when listening to speech in noise.
    Puschmann S; Daeglau M; Stropahl M; Mirkovic B; Rosemann S; Thiel CM; Debener S
    Neuroimage; 2019 Aug; 196():261-268. PubMed ID: 30978494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Auditory-visual speech perception examined by fMRI and PET.
    Sekiyama K; Kanno I; Miura S; Sugita Y
    Neurosci Res; 2003 Nov; 47(3):277-87. PubMed ID: 14568109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of a concurrent working memory task and temporal offsets on the integration of auditory and visual speech information.
    Buchan JN; Munhall KG
    Seeing Perceiving; 2012; 25(1):87-106. PubMed ID: 22353570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Visual Speech Benefit in Clear and Degraded Speech Depends on the Auditory Intelligibility of the Talker and the Number of Background Talkers.
    Blackburn CL; Kitterick PT; Jones G; Sumner CJ; Stacey PC
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519837866. PubMed ID: 30909814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The development of visual preferences for direct versus averted gaze faces in infant macaques (Macaca mulatta).
    Muschinski J; Feczko E; Brooks JM; Collantes M; Heitz TR; Parr LA
    Dev Psychobiol; 2016 Dec; 58(8):926-936. PubMed ID: 27195755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The redeployment of attention to the mouth of a talking face during the second year of life.
    Hillairet de Boisferon A; Tift AH; Minar NJ; Lewkowicz DJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Aug; 172():189-200. PubMed ID: 29627481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The contribution of dynamic visual cues to audiovisual speech perception.
    Jaekl P; Pesquita A; Alsius A; Munhall K; Soto-Faraco S
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():402-10. PubMed ID: 26100561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prediction and constraint in audiovisual speech perception.
    Peelle JE; Sommers MS
    Cortex; 2015 Jul; 68():169-81. PubMed ID: 25890390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.