146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1862215)
1. Electric shock for infant: disciplinary action for nurse. Case in point: Cafiero v. N.C. Board of Nursing (403 S.E. 2d 582--NC (1991)).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Jun; 32(1):4. PubMed ID: 1862215
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgeon not liable for CRNA: no "borrowed servant". Case in point: Harris V. Miller 438 S. E. 2d 731 NC (1994).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Mar; 34(10):2. PubMed ID: 8184088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Was apnea monitor on or off? Expert testimony. Case in point: Dent v. Memorial Hosp. of Adel, Inc. (408 S.E.2d 473--GA (1991)).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Jan; 32(8):2. PubMed ID: 1542727
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. ICU nursing: incomplete medical orders. Case in point: Warren v. Canal et als (300 S.E. 2d 557 - NC).
Regan WA
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1983 Jun; 24(1):4. PubMed ID: 6554838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Failure to determine breech position: M.D. or R.N. duty? Case in point: Alvis v. Henderson Obstetrics, S.C. (592 N.E.2d 678--[1992]).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Sep; 33(4):4. PubMed ID: 1410395
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Recovery room nurse fails to monitor patient. Case in point: Eyoma v. Falco (589 A. 2d 653--NJ 1991).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Jul; 32(2):2. PubMed ID: 1876705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Does the "continuous treatment" doctrine apply to hospitals? Case in point: Horton v. Carolina Medicorp, Inc. 460 S.E. 2d 567--NC (1995).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1995 Nov; 36(6):2. PubMed ID: 8552755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Failure to repeat vitals--paralysis: proximate cause issue. Case in point: Porter v. Lima Memorial Hospital 995 F. 2d 629--OH (1993).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Oct; 34(5):4. PubMed ID: 8248495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Hospital "self-insured": nurse's insurer liable. Case in point: Wake County Hosp. System v. National Casualty Co. (804 F. Supp. 2d 768--NC [1992]).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Feb; 33(9):2. PubMed ID: 8484000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Nurses failed to respond to patient's known difficulty in standing. Horsley v. Halifax Regional Medical Center, Inc., 725 S.E.2d 420 NC App.2012 (7/19/2011)-NC.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2012 Sep; 53(4):1. PubMed ID: 23097895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Failure to follow protocols: hospital vulnerability. Case in point: Romo v. Union Memorial Hospital, Inc. 878 F. Supp. 837--NC (1995).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1995 May; 35(12):2. PubMed ID: 7597167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Nurse "pushed the baby back into the womb". Case in point: De Leon v. Hosp. of Albert Einstein Col. (566 N.Y.S 2d 213--NY 1991).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Apr; 31(11):2. PubMed ID: 2041872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Is medical chief's inquiry of nurse subject to peer review privilege? Case in point: Roach v. Springfield Clinic 623 N.E. 2d 246--IL (1992).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Jan; 34(8):2. PubMed ID: 8127971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Nurse fails to chart call to doctor. Case in point: Morse v. Flint River Comm. Hosp. 450 S.E.2d 253--GA (1994).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1995 Jan; 35(8):2. PubMed ID: 7886195
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Nurse "fails to recall": blockbuster judgment. Case in point: Salas v. Wang (846 F. 2d 897--NJ 1988).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Aug; 29(3):2. PubMed ID: 3413281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Nursing negligence is not "proximate cause" of injury. Case in point: Beilke by Bilke v. Coryell 524 N.W. 2d 607--ND (1994).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1995 Feb; 35(9):2. PubMed ID: 7701069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Failure to adequately "monitor": $1.5 million dollar verdict. Case on point: Adams v. Cooper Hospital. 684 A. 2d 506--NJ (1996).
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1998 Feb; 38(9):2. PubMed ID: 10067607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Failure to monitor patient: deplorable nursing care. Case in point: Harrington v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's (569 N.E. 2d 15--IL (1990)).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Jun; 32(1):2. PubMed ID: 1862213
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Are you held to the standard of a nurse specialist? Case in point: Northern Trust Co. v. Louis A. Weiss Mem. Hosp. (493 N.E. 2d 5 - IL).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1986 Aug; 27(3):2. PubMed ID: 3638741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Does judgment for nurse require judgment for hospital? Case in point: Eversole v. Oklahoma Hosp. Founders (818 P. 2d. 456--OK (1991)).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Feb; 32(9):4. PubMed ID: 1565799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
