These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18622547)

  • 1. Performance of basic manipulation and intracorporeal suturing tasks in a robotic surgical system: single- versus dual-monitor views.
    Shah RD; Cao A; Golenberg L; Ellis RD; Auner GW; Pandya AK; Klein MD
    Surg Endosc; 2009 Apr; 23(4):727-33. PubMed ID: 18622547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Manual vs robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of basic manipulation and suturing tasks.
    Garcia-Ruiz A; Gagner M; Miller JH; Steiner CP; Hahn JF
    Arch Surg; 1998 Sep; 133(9):957-61. PubMed ID: 9749847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems.
    Dakin GF; Gagner M
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Apr; 17(4):574-9. PubMed ID: 12582769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of robotic and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery systems in a suturing and knot tying task.
    Eisenberg D; Vidovszky TJ; Lau J; Guiroy B; Rivas H
    Surg Endosc; 2013 Sep; 27(9):3182-6. PubMed ID: 23443484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of a supplemental wide field of view versus a single field of view with zoom on performance in minimally invasive surgery.
    Cao A; Darin Ellis R; Klein ED; Auner GW; Klein MD; Pandya AK
    Surg Endosc; 2008 Jun; 22(6):1445-51. PubMed ID: 17972133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of precision and speed in laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgical task performance.
    Zihni A; Gerull WD; Cavallo JA; Ge T; Ray S; Chiu J; Brunt LM; Awad MM
    J Surg Res; 2018 Mar; 223():29-33. PubMed ID: 29433882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The benefits of using barbed sutures with automated suturing devices in gynecologic endoscopic surgeries.
    Hart S; Sobolewski CJ
    Surg Technol Int; 2013 Sep; 23():161-5. PubMed ID: 24081852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a novel modified suture material designed to facilitate intracorporeal knot tying during laparoscopic surgery.
    Tan A; Razvi H
    J Endourol; 2005 Nov; 19(9):1104-8. PubMed ID: 16283848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Initial experience using a robotic-driven laparoscopic needle holder with ergonomic handle: assessment of surgeons' task performance and ergonomics.
    Sánchez-Margallo JA; Sánchez-Margallo FM
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Dec; 12(12):2069-2077. PubMed ID: 28695479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robot assisted versus laparoscopic suturing learning curve in a simulated setting.
    Leijte E; de Blaauw I; Van Workum F; Rosman C; Botden S
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3679-3689. PubMed ID: 31754849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transferability of Virtual Reality, Simulation-Based, Robotic Suturing Skills to a Live Porcine Model in Novice Surgeons: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Vargas MV; Moawad G; Denny K; Happ L; Misa NY; Margulies S; Opoku-Anane J; Abi Khalil E; Marfori C
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):420-425. PubMed ID: 28027975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laparoscopic suturing and knot tying: a comparison of standard techniques to a mechanical assist device.
    Bermas H; Fenoglio M; Haun W; Moore JT
    JSLS; 2004; 8(2):187-9. PubMed ID: 15119668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is Single-Port Laparoscopy More Precise and Faster with the Robot?
    Fransen SA; van den Bos J; Stassen LP; Bouvy ND
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2016 Nov; 26(11):898-904. PubMed ID: 27705082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing the da Vinci si single console and dual console in teaching novice surgeons suturing techniques.
    Crusco S; Jackson T; Advincula A
    JSLS; 2014; 18(3):. PubMed ID: 25392618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is a robotic system really better than the three-dimensional laparoscopic system in terms of suturing performance?: comparison among operators with different levels of experience.
    Park YS; Oo AM; Son SY; Shin DJ; Jung DH; Ahn SH; Park DJ; Kim HH
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1485-90. PubMed ID: 26139502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotic surgery: identifying the learning curve through objective measurement of skill.
    Chang L; Satava RM; Pellegrini CA; Sinanan MN
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Nov; 17(11):1744-8. PubMed ID: 12958686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and validation of the objective assessment of robotic suturing and knot tying skills for chicken anastomotic model.
    Puliatti S; Mazzone E; Amato M; De Groote R; Mottrie A; Gallagher AG
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Aug; 35(8):4285-4294. PubMed ID: 32857241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices.
    Chandra V; Nehra D; Parent R; Woo R; Reyes R; Hernandez-Boussard T; Dutta S
    Surgery; 2010 Jun; 147(6):830-9. PubMed ID: 20045162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect on surgical skills of expert surgeons using 3D/HD and 2D/4K resolution monitors in laparoscopic phantom tasks.
    Harada H; Kanaji S; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Matsuda Y; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Oshikiri T; Sumi Y; Nakamura T; Suzuki S; Kakeji Y
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Oct; 32(10):4228-4234. PubMed ID: 29603005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison and analysis of laparoscopic intracorporeal suturing devices: preliminary results.
    Pattaras JG; Smith GS; Landman J; Moore RG
    J Endourol; 2001 Mar; 15(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 11325091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.