These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18622595)

  • 41. Knee chondral lesions: incidence and correlation between arthroscopic and magnetic resonance findings.
    Figueroa D; Calvo R; Vaisman A; Carrasco MA; Moraga C; Delgado I
    Arthroscopy; 2007 Mar; 23(3):312-5. PubMed ID: 17349476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison Between 3-Dimensional Multiple-Echo Recombined Gradient Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Arthroscopic Findings for the Evaluation of Acetabular Labrum Tear.
    Higashihira S; Kobayashi N; Oishi T; Choe H; Ike H; Tezuka T; Inaba Y
    Arthroscopy; 2019 Oct; 35(10):2857-2865. PubMed ID: 31604505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Acute, traumatic versus chronic cartilage lesions as terms of a medical expert's opinion].
    Hempfling H; Bohndorf K; Roemer F
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2008; 146(3):381-91. PubMed ID: 18561086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: comparison between fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging, fat-suppressed FSE imaging, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopy.
    Yoshioka H; Stevens K; Hargreaves BA; Steines D; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Winalski CS; Lang P
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):857-64. PubMed ID: 15503323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Evaluation of patellar chondromalacia with MR: comparison between T2-weighted FSE SPIR and GE MTC.
    Macarini L; Perrone A; Murrone M; Marini S; Stefanelli M
    Radiol Med; 2004 Sep; 108(3):159-71. PubMed ID: 15343130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Cartilaginous defects of the femorotibial joint: accuracy of coronal short inversion time inversion-recovery MR sequence.
    Jungius KP; Schmid MR; Zanetti M; Hodler J; Koch P; Pfirrmann CW
    Radiology; 2006 Aug; 240(2):482-8. PubMed ID: 16801363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Sensitivity of routine 1.0-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging versus arthroscopy as gold standard in fresh traumatic chondral lesions of the knee in young adults.
    Kuikka PI; Kiuru MJ; Niva MH; Kröger H; Pihlajamäki HK
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Oct; 22(10):1033-9. PubMed ID: 17027399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Direct MR arthrography of the wrist in comparison with arthroscopy: a prospective study on 125 patients].
    Schmitt R; Christopoulos G; Meier R; Coblenz G; Fröhner S; Lanz U; Krimmer H
    Rofo; 2003 Jul; 175(7):911-9. PubMed ID: 12847645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Can MRI of the knee affect arthroscopic practice? A prospective study of 58 patients.
    Spiers AS; Meagher T; Ostlere SJ; Wilson DJ; Dodd CA
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1993 Jan; 75(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 8421033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluation of the articular cartilage of the knee joint: value of adding a T2 mapping sequence to a routine MR imaging protocol.
    Kijowski R; Blankenbaker DG; Munoz Del Rio A; Baer GS; Graf BK
    Radiology; 2013 May; 267(2):503-13. PubMed ID: 23297335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Osteochondral lesions of the talus: a new magnetic resonance grading system with arthroscopic correlation.
    Mintz DN; Tashjian GS; Connell DA; Deland JT; O'Malley M; Potter HG
    Arthroscopy; 2003 Apr; 19(4):353-9. PubMed ID: 12671617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. MR in the study of knee cartilage pathologies: influence of location and grade on the effectiveness of the method.
    Macarini L; Murrone M; Marini S; Mariano M; Zaccheo N; Moretti B
    Radiol Med; 2003 Apr; 105(4):296-307. PubMed ID: 12835623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Detection of degenerative cartilage disease: comparison of high-resolution morphological MR and quantitative T2 mapping at 3.0 Tesla.
    Apprich S; Welsch GH; Mamisch TC; Szomolanyi P; Mayerhoefer M; Pinker K; Trattnig S
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2010 Sep; 18(9):1211-7. PubMed ID: 20633680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Evaluation of grades 3 and 4 chondromalacia of the knee using T2*-weighted 3D gradient-echo articular cartilage imaging.
    Murphy BJ
    Skeletal Radiol; 2001 Jun; 30(6):305-11. PubMed ID: 11465769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Comparison of the relativity of MRI appearance of cartilage injuries and postoperative effect of arthroscope on articular cartilage disease of knee].
    Yang G; Yan SG; Feng JJ; Wang YJ; Zhong JP; Liu TM; Ma YM; Gao ZY; Xu TF
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2010 Feb; 23(2):90-3. PubMed ID: 20345026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. 3T MRI of the knee with optimised isotropic 3D sequences: Accurate delineation of intra-articular pathology without prolonged acquisition times.
    Abdulaal OM; Rainford L; MacMahon P; Kavanagh E; Galligan M; Cashman J; McGee A
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Nov; 27(11):4563-4570. PubMed ID: 28432504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. MRI findings in injured articular cartilage of the knee correlated with surgical findings.
    Li XM; Peng WJ; Wu H; Kacher D; Xia LM; Ai F; Li F; Xiong W
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Nov; 122(21):2624-30. PubMed ID: 19951582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Association between quantitative MRI and ICRS arthroscopic grading of articular cartilage.
    Casula V; Hirvasniemi J; Lehenkari P; Ojala R; Haapea M; Saarakkala S; Lammentausta E; Nieminen MT
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Jun; 24(6):2046-54. PubMed ID: 25209205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of 3D vs. 2D fast spin echo imaging for evaluation of articular cartilage in the knee on a 3T system scientific research.
    Milewski MD; Smitaman E; Moukaddam H; Katz LD; Essig DA; Medvecky MJ; Haims AH
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1637-43. PubMed ID: 21683539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Prospective comparison of 3D FIESTA versus fat-suppressed 3D SPGR MRI in evaluating knee cartilage lesions.
    Li X; Yu C; Wu H; Daniel K; Hu D; Xia L; Pan C; Xu A; Hu J; Wang L; Peng W; Li F
    Clin Radiol; 2009 Oct; 64(10):1000-8. PubMed ID: 19748006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.