57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18622796)
1. Soft tissue dissection in placement of reference markers during computer aided total hip arthroplasty.
Board TN; Kendoff D; Citak M; Krettek C; Hüfner T
Comput Aided Surg; 2008 Jul; 13(4):218-24. PubMed ID: 18622796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of fixation and location on the stability of the markers in navigated total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study.
Mayr E; de la Barrera JL; Eller G; Bach C; Nogler M
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Feb; 88(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 16434518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reference marker stability in computer aided orthopedic surgery: a biomechanical study in artificial bone and cadavers.
Citak M; Board TN; Sun Y; Look V; Krettek C; Hüfner T; Kendoff D
Technol Health Care; 2007; 15(6):407-14. PubMed ID: 18057564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An in vivo model for intraoperative assessment of impingement and dislocation in total hip arthroplasty.
Tanino H; Ito H; Harman MK; Matsuno T; Hodge WA; Banks SA
J Arthroplasty; 2008 Aug; 23(5):714-20. PubMed ID: 18534546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of optimal range of socket orientations in total hip arthroplasty with use of computer-aided design simulation.
Seki M; Yuasa N; Ohkuni K
J Orthop Res; 1998 Jul; 16(4):513-7. PubMed ID: 9747795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors affecting hip range of motion in surface replacement arthroplasty.
Vendittoli PA; Ganapathi M; Nuño N; Plamondon D; Lavigne M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Nov; 22(9):1004-12. PubMed ID: 17870221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experimental validation of noninvasive referencing in navigated procedures on long bones.
Kendoff D; Bogojević A; Citak M; Citak M; Maier C; Maier G; Krettek C; Hüfner T
J Orthop Res; 2007 Feb; 25(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 17089402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Accuracy improvement of acetabular component placement using non-image based surgical navigation system].
Yu Z; Wang L; Gui J
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Oct; 21(10):1057-61. PubMed ID: 17990769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Experimental validation of a pinless femoral reference array for computer-assisted hip arthroplasty.
Renkawitz T; Wegner M; Gneiting S; Haimerl M; Sendtner E; Kalteis T; Grifka J
J Orthop Res; 2010 May; 28(5):583-8. PubMed ID: 19950361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anatomic hip range of motion after implantation during total hip arthroplasty as measured by a navigation system.
Miki H; Yamanashi W; Nishii T; Sato Y; Yoshikawa H; Sugano N
J Arthroplasty; 2007 Oct; 22(7):946-52. PubMed ID: 17920464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bony impingement affects range of motion after total hip arthroplasty: A subject-specific approach.
Kessler O; Patil S; Wirth S; Mayr E; Colwell CW; D'Lima DD
J Orthop Res; 2008 Apr; 26(4):443-52. PubMed ID: 18050356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Test bed for assessment of the kinematical determination of navigation systems for total knee arthroplasty. Does a limited range of motion of the hip joint influence the accuracy of the determination?
Schwarz ML; Pott PP; Beck A; Heute S; Scharf HP
Comput Aided Surg; 2005 Jan; 10(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 16199382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impingement after total hip arthroplasty related to prosthetic component selection and range of motion.
Gondi G; Roberson JR; Ganey TM; Shahriari A; Hutton WC
J South Orthop Assoc; 1997; 6(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 9434247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of the CCD-angle on range of motion and cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty.
Widmer KH; Majewski M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Aug; 20(7):723-8. PubMed ID: 15964112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical contribution of transverse connectors to segmental stability following long segment instrumentation with thoracic pedicle screws.
Kuklo TR; Dmitriev AE; Cardoso MJ; Lehman RA; Erickson M; Gill NW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(15):E482-7. PubMed ID: 18594445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy evaluation of surface-based registration methods in a computer navigation system for hip surgery performed through a posterolateral approach.
Sugano N; Sasama T; Sato Y; Nakajima Y; Nishii T; Yonenobu K; Tamura S; Ochi T
Comput Aided Surg; 2001; 6(4):195-203. PubMed ID: 11835614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reference markers in computer aided orthopaedic surgery: rotational stability testings and clinical implications.
Kendoff D; Gardner MJ; Krettek C; Hüfner T; Citak M
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Jun; 128(6):633-8. PubMed ID: 17978825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Method for the evaluation of factors influencing the dislocation stability of total hip endoprotheses].
Bader R; Scholz R; Steinhauser E; Busch R; Mittelmeier W
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2004 May; 49(5):137-44. PubMed ID: 15212199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of a computer navigation system and a CT method for determination of the orientation of implanted acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study.
Lin F; Lim D; Wixson RL; Milos S; Hendrix RW; Makhsous M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Oct; 23(8):1004-11. PubMed ID: 18541352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally invasive orthopedic surgery: first results in navigated total hip arthroplasty.
Walde HJ; Walde TA
Orthopedics; 2006 Oct; 29(10 Suppl):S139-41. PubMed ID: 17407941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
