These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
360 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18622840)
1. Comparison of vacuum-formed removable rigid dressing with conventional rigid dressing after transtibial amputation: similar outcome in a randomized controlled trial involving 27 patients. Johannesson A; Larsson GU; Oberg T; Atroshi I Acta Orthop; 2008 Jun; 79(3):361-9. PubMed ID: 18622840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Residual limb wounds or ulcers heal in transtibial amputees using an active suction socket system. A randomized controlled study. Traballesi M; Delussu AS; Fusco A; Iosa M; Averna T; Pellegrini R; Brunelli S Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2012 Dec; 48(4):613-23. PubMed ID: 22641248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rigid removable dressing in a case of poor wound healing. Richter KJ; Hurvitz EA; Girardot K Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1988 Feb; 69(2):128-9. PubMed ID: 3341892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of immediate postoperative rigid and soft dressings for below-knee amputations. Sumpio B; Shine SR; Mahler D; Sumpio BE Ann Vasc Surg; 2013 Aug; 27(6):774-80. PubMed ID: 23880455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Porous removable rigid dressing for complicated below-knee amputation stumps. Gandhavadi B Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1987 Jan; 68(1):51-3. PubMed ID: 3800627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of early mobilization on unhealed dysvascular transtibial amputation stumps: a clinical trial. Vanross ER; Johnson S; Abbott CA Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Apr; 90(4):610-7. PubMed ID: 19345776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pneumatic Airleg prosthesis: report of 200 cases. Bonner FJ; Green RF Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1982 Aug; 63(8):383-5. PubMed ID: 7115032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy of portable vacuum dressing in chronic wound care: a prospective randomized control trial. Pruksapong C J Med Assoc Thai; 2011 Oct; 94(10):1212-7. PubMed ID: 22145506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Removable rigid dressings versus soft dressings: a randomized, controlled study with dysvascular, trans-tibial amputees. Deutsch A; English RD; Vermeer TC; Murray PS; Condous M Prosthet Orthot Int; 2005 Aug; 29(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 16281728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transtibial prosthetic socket pistoning: static evaluation of Seal-In(®) X5 and Dermo(®) Liner using motion analysis system. Gholizadeh H; Osman NA; Kamyab M; Eshraghi A; Abas WA; Azam MN Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2012 Jan; 27(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 21794965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of homecare costs of local wound care in surgical patients randomized between occlusive and gauze dressings. Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; van Hattem J J Clin Nurs; 2008 Mar; 17(5):593-601. PubMed ID: 18279292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do rigid dressings reduce the time from amputation to prosthetic fitting? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Churilov I; Churilov L; Murphy D Ann Vasc Surg; 2014 Oct; 28(7):1801-8. PubMed ID: 24911808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CIR Casting System for making transtibial sockets. Wu Y; Casanova HR; Reisinger KD; Smith WK; Childress DS Prosthet Orthot Int; 2009 Mar; 33(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19235060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]