These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18623259)

  • 1. Properties of microfiltration membranes: Mechanisms of flux loss in the recovery of an enzyme.
    Bowen WR; Hall NJ
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1995 Apr; 46(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 18623259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Properties of microfiltration membranes: the effects of adsorption and shear on the recovery of an enzyme.
    Bowen WR; Gan Q
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1992 Aug; 40(4):491-7. PubMed ID: 18601143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Properties of microfiltration membranes: flux loss during constant pressure permeation of bovine serum albumin.
    Bowen WR; Gan Q
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1991 Oct; 38(7):688-96. PubMed ID: 18600795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of added yeast on protein transmission and flux in cross-flow membrane microfiltration.
    Kuberkar VT; Davis RH
    Biotechnol Prog; 1999 May; 15(3):472-9. PubMed ID: 10356265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Crossflow filtration of yeast broth cultivated in molasses.
    Tanaka T; Kamimura R; Fujiwara R; Nakanishi K
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1994 May; 43(11):1094-101. PubMed ID: 18615521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Combined Pore Blockage and Cake Filtration Model for Protein Fouling during Microfiltration.
    Ho CC; Zydney AL
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2000 Dec; 232(2):389-399. PubMed ID: 11097775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of pore size, shear rate, and harvest time during the constant permeate flux microfiltration of CHO cell culture supernatant.
    Stressmann M; Moresoli C
    Biotechnol Prog; 2008; 24(4):890-7. PubMed ID: 19194898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of ionic strength and pH on hydraulic properties and structure of accumulating solid assemblages during microfiltration of montmorillonite suspensions.
    Santiwong SR; Guan J; Waite TD
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2008 Jan; 317(1):214-27. PubMed ID: 17959193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Yeast Cell Cake Characterization in Alcohol Solution for Efficient Microfiltration.
    Katagiri N; Tomimatsu K; Date K; Iritani E
    Membranes (Basel); 2021 Jan; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 33513956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of Interparticle Electrostatic Double Layer Interactions on Permeate Flux Decline in Crossflow Membrane Filtration of Colloidal Suspensions: An Experimental Investigation.
    Faibish RS; Elimelech M; Cohen Y
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 1998 Aug; 204(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 9665769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modeling the influence of slurry concentration on Saccharomyces cerevisiae cake porosity and resistance during microfiltration.
    Mota M; Flickinger MC
    Biotechnol Prog; 2012; 28(6):1534-41. PubMed ID: 23011664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Protein Adsorption and Deposition onto Microfiltration Membranes: The Role of Solute-Solid Interactions.
    Martínez F; Martín A; Prádanos P; Calvo JI; Palacio L; Hernández A
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2000 Jan; 221(2):254-261. PubMed ID: 10631028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of filtration characteristics in submerged microfiltration for drinking water treatment.
    Lee S; Park PK; Kim JH; Yeon KM; Lee CH
    Water Res; 2008 Jun; 42(12):3109-21. PubMed ID: 18387649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Crossflow microfiltration of yeast suspensions in tubular filters.
    Redkar SG; Davis RH
    Biotechnol Prog; 1993; 9(6):625-34. PubMed ID: 7764351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pore blocking mechanisms during early stages of membrane fouling by colloids.
    Wang F; Tarabara VV
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2008 Dec; 328(2):464-9. PubMed ID: 18848335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of solution pH and ionic strength on the separation of albumin from immunoglobulins (IgG) by selective filtration.
    Saksena S; Zydney AL
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1994 Apr; 43(10):960-8. PubMed ID: 18615443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Membrane foulants and fouling mechanisms in microfiltration and ultrafiltration of an activated sludge effluent.
    Nguyen ST; Roddick FA; Harris JL
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(9):1975-83. PubMed ID: 21045321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monte Carlo simulation of pore blocking phenomena in cross-flow microfiltration.
    Chen Y; Hu X; Kim H
    Water Res; 2011 Dec; 45(20):6789-97. PubMed ID: 22071323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Protein recovery from cell debris using rotary and tangential crossflow microfiltration.
    Parnham CS; Davis RH
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1995 Jul; 47(2):155-64. PubMed ID: 18623388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.