BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18623608)

  • 21. Comparing denominator degrees of freedom approximations for the generalized linear mixed model in analyzing binary outcome in small sample cluster-randomized trials.
    Li P; Redden DT
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Apr; 15():38. PubMed ID: 25899170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Switching cluster membership in cluster randomized control trials: Implications for design and analysis.
    Schweig JD; Pane JF; McCaffrey DF
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Aug; 25(4):516-534. PubMed ID: 32271041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Nested Markov compliance class model in the presence of time-varying noncompliance.
    Lin JY; Ten Have TR; Elliott MR
    Biometrics; 2009 Jun; 65(2):505-13. PubMed ID: 18759831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Estimation of the risk difference under a noncompliance randomized clinical trial with missing outcomes.
    Lui KJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(2):273-92. PubMed ID: 18327721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Statistical power in randomized intervention studies with noncompliance.
    Jo B
    Psychol Methods; 2002 Jun; 7(2):178-93. PubMed ID: 12090409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Intention to treat, per protocol, as treated and instrumental variable estimators given non-compliance and effect heterogeneity.
    McNamee R
    Stat Med; 2009 Sep; 28(21):2639-52. PubMed ID: 19579227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables in randomized trials with stochastic compliance.
    Scosyrev E
    Biom J; 2013 Jan; 55(1):97-113. PubMed ID: 23180483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The implications of noncompliance for randomized trials with partial nesting due to group treatment.
    Roberts C
    Stat Med; 2021 Jan; 40(2):349-368. PubMed ID: 33118193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Multiple imputation methods for treatment noncompliance and nonresponse in randomized clinical trials.
    Taylor L; Zhou XH
    Biometrics; 2009 Mar; 65(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 18397338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Identifiability and estimation of causal effects in randomized trials with noncompliance and completely nonignorable missing data.
    Chen H; Geng Z; Zhou XH
    Biometrics; 2009 Sep; 65(3):675-82. PubMed ID: 18759847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Test homogeneity of odds ratio in a randomized clinical trial with noncompliance.
    Lui KJ; Chang KC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Sep; 19(5):916-32. PubMed ID: 20183452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A causal proportional hazards estimator for the effect of treatment actually received in a randomized trial with all-or-nothing compliance.
    Loeys T; Goetghebeur E
    Biometrics; 2003 Mar; 59(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 12762446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Disentangling estimands and the intention-to-treat principle.
    Leuchs AK; Brandt A; Zinserling J; Benda N
    Pharm Stat; 2017 Jan; 16(1):12-19. PubMed ID: 27910217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sample size estimation for stratified individual and cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes.
    Kennedy-Shaffer L; Hughes MD
    Stat Med; 2020 May; 39(10):1489-1513. PubMed ID: 32003492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sensitivity of estimands in clinical trials with imperfect compliance.
    Chen H; Heitjan DF
    Int J Biostat; 2024 May; 20(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 37365674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Repairing the efficiency loss due to varying cluster sizes in two-level two-armed randomized trials with heterogeneous clustering.
    Candel MJ; Van Breukelen GJ
    Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(12):2000-15. PubMed ID: 26756696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Deviation from intention to treat analysis in randomised trials and treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study.
    Abraha I; Cherubini A; Cozzolino F; De Florio R; Luchetta ML; Rimland JM; Folletti I; Marchesi M; Germani A; Orso M; Eusebi P; Montedori A
    BMJ; 2015 May; 350():h2445. PubMed ID: 26016488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters: which analyses should be used?
    Leyrat C; Morgan KE; Leurent B; Kahan BC
    Int J Epidemiol; 2018 Feb; 47(1):321-331. PubMed ID: 29025158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of methods for estimating the causal effect of a treatment in randomized clinical trials subject to noncompliance.
    Little RJ; Long Q; Lin X
    Biometrics; 2009 Jun; 65(2):640-9. PubMed ID: 18510650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in community-based cluster randomization trials with a binary outcome.
    Braschel MC; Svec I; Darlington GA; Donner A
    Clin Trials; 2016 Apr; 13(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 26415500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.