These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. The peer review privilege: a dying cause? McKinney P J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jul; 25(7):201-11, 215. PubMed ID: 10123592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. 2003 Schwartz Award. Pitfalls of peer review. The limited protections of state and federal peer review law for physicians. Nijm LM J Leg Med; 2003 Dec; 24(4):541-56. PubMed ID: 14660324 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Laws vary on use of peer review records in litigation. Berliner MC Provider; 1987 May; 13(5):44, 46. PubMed ID: 10281935 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Legal aspects of the medical staff peer review process. Medicolegal issues arising in the emerging mandated health data disclosure era. Couch JB Qual Assur Util Rev; 1988 Aug; 3(3):95-7. PubMed ID: 2980939 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Medical peer review: the need to organize a protective approach. Mills DH Health Matrix Clevel; 1991; 1(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 10121880 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Legal issues raised by private review activities of medical peer-review organizations. Hastings DA J Health Polit Policy Law; 1983; 8(2):293-313. PubMed ID: 6684668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Legal aspects of the medical staff peer review process. Legally permissible uses of mandated health data disclosure. Couch JB Qual Assur Util Rev; 1988 Nov; 3(4):124-6. PubMed ID: 2980945 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Confidentiality of peer review. Battaglia VF Del Med J; 1999 Mar; 71(3):143-6. PubMed ID: 10208062 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Antitrust law and peer review remain at odds. Riffer J Hospitals; 1986 Feb; 60(3):58. PubMed ID: 3753695 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The latest word on confidentiality of peer review. Cronan CJ J Ky Med Assoc; 1998 Dec; 96(12):491-3. PubMed ID: 9879179 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Discoverability and admissibility of medical staff committee records: a state-by-state analysis. Roach WH Top Health Rec Manage; 1981 Sep; 2(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 10252569 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Legal issues in peer review for self-insured employers. Ragsdale JC Ala J Med Sci; 1985 Oct; 22(4):409-10. PubMed ID: 4073393 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. VA hospital documents sought: suit threatens peer review privacy. Am Med News; 1979 Dec; 22(47):1, 14. PubMed ID: 10244813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Legal issues arising from peer review processes. Thomson C Aust Health Rev; 1986; 9(3):258-69. PubMed ID: 10279574 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]