155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18625131)
1. The value of esophageal histology in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with heartburn and normal endoscopy.
Tytgat GN
Curr Gastroenterol Rep; 2008 Jun; 10(3):231-4. PubMed ID: 18625131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Esophageal intraluminal baseline impedance differentiates gastroesophageal reflux disease from functional heartburn.
Kandulski A; Weigt J; Caro C; Jechorek D; Wex T; Malfertheiner P
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2015 Jun; 13(6):1075-81. PubMed ID: 25496815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Image-enhanced endoscopy is specific for the diagnosis of non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Parikh ND; Viana AV; Shah S; Laine L
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Mar; 53(3):260-264. PubMed ID: 29368532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Circumferential and axial distribution of esophageal mucosal damage in reflux disease.
Edebo A; Vieth M; Tam W; Bruno M; van Berkel AM; Stolte M; Schoeman M; Tytgat G; Dent J; Lundell L
Dis Esophagus; 2007; 20(3):232-8. PubMed ID: 17509120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hypersensitivity to acid is associated with impaired esophageal mucosal integrity in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease with and without esophagitis.
Weijenborg PW; Smout AJ; Verseijden C; van Veen HA; Verheij J; de Jonge WJ; Bredenoord AJ
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol; 2014 Aug; 307(3):G323-9. PubMed ID: 24924748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mucosal integrity and sensitivity to acid in the proximal esophagus in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.
van Hoeij FB; Weijenborg PW; van den Bergh Weerman MA; van den Wijngaard RM; Verheij J; Smout AJ; Bredenoord AJ
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol; 2016 Jul; 311(1):G117-22. PubMed ID: 27198192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Esophageal histology does not provide additional useful information over clinical assessment in identifying reflux patients presenting for esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Nandurkar S; Talley NJ; Martin CJ; Ng T; Adams S
Dig Dis Sci; 2000 Feb; 45(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 10711428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multimodality evaluation of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms who have failed empiric proton pump inhibitor therapy.
Galindo G; Vassalle J; Marcus SN; Triadafilopoulos G
Dis Esophagus; 2013 Jul; 26(5):443-50. PubMed ID: 22862422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impairment of chemical clearance and mucosal integrity distinguishes hypersensitive esophagus from functional heartburn.
Frazzoni M; de Bortoli N; Frazzoni L; Furnari M; Martinucci I; Tolone S; Farioli A; Marchi S; Fuccio L; Savarino V; Savarino E
J Gastroenterol; 2017 Apr; 52(4):444-451. PubMed ID: 27241210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation of narrow band imaging endoscopy and histopathology in the diagnosis of nonerosive reflux disease.
Arul P; Vinoth B; Alexander T; Phansalkar M; Padhi S
Saudi J Gastroenterol; 2015; 21(5):330-6. PubMed ID: 26458862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Untangling Nonerosive Reflux Disease From Functional Heartburn.
Patel D; Fass R; Vaezi M
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Jul; 19(7):1314-1326. PubMed ID: 32246998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microscopic esophageal mucosal injury in nonerosive reflux disease.
Dent J
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Jan; 5(1):4-16. PubMed ID: 17157563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The nonerosive reflux disease-gastroesophageal reflux disease controversy.
Winter JW; Heading RC
Curr Opin Gastroenterol; 2008 Jul; 24(4):509-15. PubMed ID: 18622168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recent developments in gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus: ANNO 2012.
Tytgat GN
J Dig Dis; 2012 Jun; 13(6):291-5. PubMed ID: 22624551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radial distribution of dilated intercellular spaces of the esophageal squamous epithelium in patients with reflux disease exhibiting discrete endoscopic lesions.
Vieth M; Fiocca R; Haringsma J; Delarive J; Wiesel PH; Tam W; Tytgat GN; Dent J; Edebo A; Lundell L; Stolte M
Dig Dis; 2004; 22(2):208-12. PubMed ID: 15383763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The pathogenesis of heartburn in nonerosive reflux disease: a unifying hypothesis.
Barlow WJ; Orlando RC
Gastroenterology; 2005 Mar; 128(3):771-8. PubMed ID: 15765412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. AGA Clinical Practice Update on Functional Heartburn: Expert Review.
Fass R; Zerbib F; Gyawali CP
Gastroenterology; 2020 Jun; 158(8):2286-2293. PubMed ID: 32017911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Orlando RC
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2008; 42(5):584-8. PubMed ID: 18364588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The histologic squamo-oxyntic gap: an accurate and reproducible diagnostic marker of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Chandrasoma P; Wijetunge S; Demeester SR; Hagen J; Demeester TR
Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Nov; 34(11):1574-81. PubMed ID: 20871393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ambulatory 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring and high resolution endoscopy distinguish patients with non-erosive reflux disease from those with functional heartburn.
Chu C; Du Q; Li C; Zhang L; Zhou X; Zuo F; Zhang Y; Li F; Xie G; Li Y
PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175263. PubMed ID: 28384225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
