These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18625551)

  • 1. Comparison of odour emission rates measured from various sources using two sampling devices.
    Hudson N; Ayoko GA; Dunlop M; Duperouzel D; Burrell D; Bell K; Gallagher E; Nicholas P; Heinrich N
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Jan; 100(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 18625551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Design and validation of a wind tunnel system for odour sampling on liquid area sources.
    Capelli L; Sironi S; Del Rosso R; Céntola P
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(8):1611-20. PubMed ID: 19403975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Odour sampling. 2. Comparison of physical and aerodynamic characteristics of sampling devices: a review.
    Hudson N; Ayoko GA
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Jul; 99(10):3993-4007. PubMed ID: 17512194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improvement of a wind-tunnel sampling system for odour and VOCs.
    Wang X; Jiang J; Kaye R
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):71-7. PubMed ID: 11762486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dynamic flux chamber measurements of hydrogen sulfide emission rate from a quiescent surface--A computational evaluation.
    Prata AA; Santos JM; Beghi SP; Fernandes IF; Vom Marttens LL; Pereira Neto LI; Martins RS; Reis NC; Stuetz RM
    Chemosphere; 2016 Mar; 146():426-34. PubMed ID: 26741548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Odour sampling 1: Physical chemistry considerations.
    Hudson N; Ayoko GA
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Jul; 99(10):3982-92. PubMed ID: 17596941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Aerodynamic performance of a low-speed wind tunnel.
    Frechen FB; Frey M; Wett M; Löser C
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(4):57-64. PubMed ID: 15484743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a novel wind tunnel for the measurement of the kinetics of odour emissions from piggery effluent.
    Sohn JH; Smith R; Yoong E; Hudson N; Kim TI
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(4):49-55. PubMed ID: 15484742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of the dynamics of odour emissions from pig farms using dynamic olfactometry and an electronic odour sensor.
    Brose G; Gallmann E; Hartung E; Jungbluth T
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):59-64. PubMed ID: 11762484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Applicability of sniffing team observations: experience of field measurements.
    Van Langenhove H; Van Broeck G
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):65-70. PubMed ID: 11762485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of a method for odor sampling on solid area sources.
    Capelli L; Sironi S; Barczak R; Il Grande M; Del Rosso R
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(8):1607-13. PubMed ID: 22907441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dispersion modeling of odour, gases, and respirable dust using AERMOD for poultry and dairy barns in the Canadian Prairies.
    Huang D; Guo H
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Nov; 690():620-628. PubMed ID: 31301502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of odor concentration from mechanical-biological treatment piles using static chamber and wind tunnel with different wind speed values.
    Szyłak-Szydłowski M
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Sep; 67(9):1046-1054. PubMed ID: 28614044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Odour emission ability (OEA) and its application in assessing odour removal efficiency.
    Wang X; Parcsi G; Sivret E; Le H; Wang B; Stuetz RM
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(9):1828-33. PubMed ID: 22925852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of an odorant emission model for sewage treatment works.
    Gostelow P; Parsons SA; Cobb J
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):181-8. PubMed ID: 11762460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The odour of digested sewage sludge--determination and its abatement by air stripping.
    Winter P; Jones N; Asaadi M; Bowman L
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(9):185-92. PubMed ID: 15237624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Odour emission characteristics of 22 recreational rivers in Nanjing.
    Wan Y; Ruan X; Wang X; Ma Q; Lu X
    Environ Monit Assess; 2014 Oct; 186(10):6061-81. PubMed ID: 24939710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Difference in the odor concentrations measured by the triangle odor bag method and dynamic olfactometry.
    Ueno H; Amano S; Merecka B; Kośmider J
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(7):1339-42. PubMed ID: 19380999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of two dynamic measurement methods of odor and odorant emission rates from freshly dewatered biosolids.
    Wang T; Sattayatewa C; Venkatesan D; Noll KE; Pagilla KR; Moschandreas DJ
    J Environ Monit; 2011 Jun; 13(6):1746-52. PubMed ID: 21552636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determination of the dynamics of the odour release from a pig house, using an electronic odour sensor.
    Gallmann E; Hartung E; Brose G; Jungbluth T
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(4):101-8. PubMed ID: 15484748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.