These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18625938)

  • 1. Comparison of predictions made by the intraocular lens master and ultrasound biometry.
    Bhatt AB; Schefler AC; Feuer WJ; Yoo SH; Murray TG
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2008 Jul; 126(7):929-33. PubMed ID: 18625938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation by the IOLMaster in phakic and eyes with hydrophobic acrylic lenses.
    Chang SW; Yu CY; Chen DP
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jul; 116(7):1336-42. PubMed ID: 19427697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparison of the optical coherence method (Zeiss IOL-Master) with two ultrasonographic biometric methods for the calculation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses after phacoemulsification as part of clinical routine].
    Remsch H; Kampmeier J; Muche R; Lang GE; Lang GK
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Oct; 221(10):837-42. PubMed ID: 15499518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of refractive outcomes using immersion ultrasound biometry and IOLMaster biometry.
    Landers J; Goggin M
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Aug; 37(6):566-9. PubMed ID: 19702705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anterior chamber depth, intraocular lens position, and refractive outcomes after cataract surgery.
    Engren AL; Behndig A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Apr; 39(4):572-7. PubMed ID: 23395354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing ultrasound biometry with partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens power calculations: a randomized study.
    Raymond S; Favilla I; Santamaria L
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Jun; 50(6):2547-52. PubMed ID: 19168907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The importance of biometry to cataract outcomes in a surgical unit in Africa.
    Briesen S; Roberts H; Lewallen S
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2010 Aug; 17(4):196-202. PubMed ID: 20642341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Partial coherence laser interferometry vs conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculations.
    Rajan MS; Keilhorn I; Bell JA
    Eye (Lond); 2002 Sep; 16(5):552-6. PubMed ID: 12194067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Partial coherence interferometry: a novel approach to biometry in cataract surgery.
    Drexler W; Findl O; Menapace R; Rainer G; Vass C; Hitzenberger CK; Fercher AF
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1998 Oct; 126(4):524-34. PubMed ID: 9780097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Formula choice: Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, or SRK/T and refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery with biometry by partial coherence interferometry.
    Aristodemou P; Knox Cartwright NE; Sparrow JM; Johnston RL
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Jan; 37(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 21183100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Refractive outcomes after silicone oil removal and intraocular lens implantation.
    Suk KK; Smiddy WE; Shi W
    Retina; 2013 Mar; 33(3):634-41. PubMed ID: 23190922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect on refractive outcomes after cataract surgery of intraocular lens constant personalization using the Haigis formula.
    Charalampidou S; Cassidy L; Ng E; Loughman J; Nolan J; Stack J; Beatty S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1081-9. PubMed ID: 20610083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of biometry for intraocular lens implantation using the new partial coherence interferometer, AL-scan.
    Moon SW; Lim SH; Lee HY
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):444-50. PubMed ID: 25435746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation using partial coherence interferometry in patients with high myopia.
    Roessler GF; Dietlein TS; Plange N; Roepke AK; Dinslage S; Walter P; Mazinani BA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 May; 32(3):228-33. PubMed ID: 22512374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparison of ultrasound and optic biometry with respect to ocular refraction after cataract surgery].
    Skorkovská S; Michálek J; Ruberová M; Synek S
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2004 Jan; 60(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 15011303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculations using the Zeiss IOL master. A prospective study.
    Verhulst E; Vrijghem JC
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 2001; (281):61-5. PubMed ID: 11702645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrasound biometry vs. IOL Master.
    Roy A; Das S; Sahu SK; Rath S
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Sep; 119(9):1937.e1-2. PubMed ID: 22944497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy and reproducibility of biometry using partial coherence interferometry.
    Connors R; Boseman P; Olson RJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Feb; 28(2):235-8. PubMed ID: 11821202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison of contact and immersion techniques of ultrasound biometry in terms of target postoperative refraction].
    Hrebcová J; Skorkovská S; Vasků A
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2009 Jul; 65(4):143-6. PubMed ID: 19750832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of IOL--master and ultrasound biometry in preoperative intra ocular lens (IOL) power calculation.
    Kolega MŠ; Kovačević S; Čanović S; Pavičić AD; Bašić JK
    Coll Antropol; 2015 Mar; 39(1):233-5. PubMed ID: 26040097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.