These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18626748)

  • 1. Effect of filler size and shape on local nanoindentation modulus of resin-composites.
    Masouras K; Akhtar R; Watts DC; Silikas N
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2008 Dec; 19(12):3561-6. PubMed ID: 18626748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nanomechanical properties of dental resin-composites.
    El-Safty S; Akhtar R; Silikas N; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2012 Dec; 28(12):1292-300. PubMed ID: 23031485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of resin-composite filler particle size and shape on shrinkage-stress.
    Satterthwaite JD; Maisuria A; Vogel K; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2012 Jun; 28(6):609-14. PubMed ID: 22342645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of filler loading and morphology on the mechanical properties of contemporary composites.
    Kim KH; Ong JL; Okuno O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):642-9. PubMed ID: 12131887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlation of filler content and elastic properties of resin-composites.
    Masouras K; Silikas N; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):932-9. PubMed ID: 18155132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hardness and Young's modulus determined by nanoindentation technique of filler particles of dental restorative materials compared with human enamel.
    Willems G; Celis JP; Lambrechts P; Braem M; Vanherle G
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 Jun; 27(6):747-55. PubMed ID: 8408104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shear punch strength and flexural strength of model composites with varying filler volume fraction, particle size and silanation.
    Ikejima I; Nomoto R; McCabe JF
    Dent Mater; 2003 May; 19(3):206-11. PubMed ID: 12628432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of resin-composite filler particle size and shape on shrinkage-strain.
    Satterthwaite JD; Vogel K; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2009 Dec; 25(12):1612-5. PubMed ID: 19801168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of a leucite-containing ceramic filler on the abrasive wear of dental composites.
    Atai M; Yassini E; Amini M; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2007 Sep; 23(9):1181-7. PubMed ID: 17507087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Filler features and their effects on wear and degree of conversion of particulate dental resin composites.
    Turssi CP; Ferracane JL; Vogel K
    Biomaterials; 2005 Aug; 26(24):4932-7. PubMed ID: 15769527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative analysis of self-cure and dual cure-dental composites on their physico-mechanical behaviour.
    Thadathil Varghese J; Raju R; Farrar P; Prentice L; Prusty BG
    Aust Dent J; 2024 Jun; 69(2):124-138. PubMed ID: 38131257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of mechanical properties in dental resin composite: Effect of filler size and filler aggregation state.
    Rodríguez HA; Kriven WM; Casanova H
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2019 Aug; 101():274-282. PubMed ID: 31029321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nanoindentation of dental composites.
    Drummond JL
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2006 Jul; 78(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 16278844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of filler particle size and morphology on force/work parameters for stickiness of unset resin-composites.
    Kaleem M; Satterthwaite JD; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2009 Dec; 25(12):1585-92. PubMed ID: 19744705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of flowable bulk-fill and flowable resin-based composites: an in vitro analysis.
    Engelhardt F; Hahnel S; Preis V; Rosentritt M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Nov; 20(8):2123-2130. PubMed ID: 26745959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    J Dent Res; 1997 Apr; 76(4):883-94. PubMed ID: 9126185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of nanoscale inorganic content over optical and surface properties of model composites.
    Salgado VE; Cavalcante LM; Silikas N; Schneider LF
    J Dent; 2013 Nov; 41 Suppl 5():e45-53. PubMed ID: 23748102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nanoindentation creep versus bulk compressive creep of dental resin-composites.
    El-Safty S; Silikas N; Akhtar R; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2012 Nov; 28(11):1171-82. PubMed ID: 22999374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro contact wear of dental composites.
    Nagarajan VS; Jahanmir S; Thompson VP
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jan; 20(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 14698775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Numerical evaluation of bulk material properties of dental composites using two-phase finite element models.
    Li J; Li H; Fok AS; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2012 Sep; 28(9):996-1003. PubMed ID: 22727356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.