These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18627545)

  • 1. Communicating risks and benefits from fish consumption: impact on Belgian consumers' perception and intention to eat fish.
    Verbeke W; Vanhonacker F; Frewer LJ; Sioen I; De Henauw S; Van Camp J
    Risk Anal; 2008 Aug; 28(4):951-67. PubMed ID: 18627545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impacts of information about the risks and benefits of pork consumption on Chinese consumers' perceptions towards, and intention to eat, pork.
    Verbeke W; Liu R
    Meat Sci; 2014 Dec; 98(4):766-72. PubMed ID: 25119515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptions of health risks and benefits associated with fish consumption among Russian consumers.
    van Dijk H; Fischer AR; Honkanen P; Frewer LJ
    Appetite; 2011 Apr; 56(2):227-34. PubMed ID: 21147191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consumers' health risk-benefit perception of seafood and attitude toward the marine environment: Insights from five European countries.
    Jacobs S; Sioen I; Pieniak Z; De Henauw S; Maulvault AL; Reuver M; Fait G; Cano-Sancho G; Verbeke W
    Environ Res; 2015 Nov; 143(Pt B):11-9. PubMed ID: 25864933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consumer response to health and environmental sustainability information regarding seafood consumption.
    Jacobs S; Sioen I; Marques A; Verbeke W
    Environ Res; 2018 Feb; 161():492-504. PubMed ID: 29223111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consumer perception versus scientific evidence about health benefits and safety risks from fish consumption.
    Verbeke W; Sioen I; Pieniak Z; Van Camp J; De Henauw S
    Public Health Nutr; 2005 Jun; 8(4):422-9. PubMed ID: 15975189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Knowledge about fish consumption advisories: a risk communication failure within a university population.
    Burger J; Gochfeld M
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Feb; 390(2-3):346-54. PubMed ID: 18006043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consumers' acceptance of an online tool with personalized health risk-benefit communication about seafood consumption.
    Minnens F; Marques A; Domingo JL; Verbeke W
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2020 Oct; 144():111573. PubMed ID: 32679283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Weighing health benefit and health risk information when consuming sport-caught fish.
    Knuth BA; A Connelly N; Sheeshka J; Patterson J
    Risk Anal; 2003 Dec; 23(6):1185-97. PubMed ID: 14641893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Impact of Disclosure of Nutrition Information on Consumers' Behavioral Intention in Korea.
    Choi J
    J Am Coll Nutr; 2015; 34(5):378-84. PubMed ID: 25826204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What determines fresh fish consumption in Croatia?
    Tomić M; Matulić D; Jelić M
    Appetite; 2016 Nov; 106():13-22. PubMed ID: 26721719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Awake at the switch: improving fish consumption advisories for at-risk women.
    Teisl MF; Fromberg E; Smith AE; Boyle KJ; Engelberth HM
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Aug; 409(18):3257-66. PubMed ID: 21663945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Individual determinants of fish consumption: application of the theory of planned behaviour.
    Verbeke W; Vackier I
    Appetite; 2005 Feb; 44(1):67-82. PubMed ID: 15604034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shellfish and residual chemical contaminants: hazards, monitoring, and health risk assessment along French coasts.
    Guéguen M; Amiard JC; Arnich N; Badot PM; Claisse D; Guérin T; Vernoux JP
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2011; 213():55-111. PubMed ID: 21541848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attitudinal determinants of fish consumption in Spain and Poland.
    Pérez-Cueto FJ; Pieniak Z; Verbeke W
    Nutr Hosp; 2011; 26(6):1412-9. PubMed ID: 22411390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consumer responses to integrated risk-benefit information associated with the consumption of food.
    van Dijk H; Fischer AR; Frewer LJ
    Risk Anal; 2011 Mar; 31(3):429-39. PubMed ID: 20880220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. State of the art in benefit-risk analysis: consumer perception.
    Ueland Ø; Gunnlaugsdottir H; Holm F; Kalogeras N; Leino O; Luteijn JM; Magnússon SH; Odekerken G; Pohjola MV; Tijhuis MJ; Tuomisto JT; White BC; Verhagen H
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2012 Jan; 50(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 21683114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Health-related beliefs and consumer knowledge as determinants of fish consumption.
    Pieniak Z; Verbeke W; Scholderer J
    J Hum Nutr Diet; 2010 Oct; 23(5):480-8. PubMed ID: 20831707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of a risk-benefit advisory on fish consumption and dietary exposure to methylmercury in France.
    Verger P; Houdart S; Marette S; Roosen J; Blanchemanche S
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Aug; 48(3):259-69. PubMed ID: 17566619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Good fish/bad fish: a composite benefit-risk by dose curve.
    Gochfeld M; Burger J
    Neurotoxicology; 2005 Aug; 26(4):511-20. PubMed ID: 15979722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.