BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18628093)

  • 1. Amended reports: development and validation of a taxonomy of defects.
    Meier FA; Zarbo RJ; Varney RC; Bonsal M; Schultz DS; Vrbin CM; Grzybicki DM; Raab SS
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Aug; 130(2):238-46. PubMed ID: 18628093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Study of amended reports to evaluate and improve surgical pathology processes.
    Meier FA; Varney RC; Zarbo RJ
    Adv Anat Pathol; 2011 Sep; 18(5):406-13. PubMed ID: 21841408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Amended reports in surgical pathology and implications for diagnostic error detection and avoidance: a College of American Pathologists Q-probes study of 1,667,547 accessioned cases in 359 laboratories.
    Nakhleh RE; Zarbo RJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Apr; 122(4):303-9. PubMed ID: 9648896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surgical pathology report defects: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 73 institutions.
    Volmar KE; Idowu MO; Hunt JL; Souers RJ; Meier FA; Nakhleh RE
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 May; 138(5):602-12. PubMed ID: 24786118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Henry Ford Production System: measures of process defects and waste in surgical pathology as a basis for quality improvement initiatives.
    D'Angelo R; Zarbo RJ
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Sep; 128(3):423-9. PubMed ID: 17709316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection and classification of diagnostic discrepancies (errors) in surgical pathology.
    Roy JE; Hunt JL
    Adv Anat Pathol; 2010 Sep; 17(5):359-65. PubMed ID: 20733354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correlation of workload with disagreement and amendment rates in surgical pathology and nongynecologic cytology.
    Renshaw AA; Gould EW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Jun; 125(6):820-2. PubMed ID: 16690479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Amendments in surgical pathology reports: An 8-year institutional experience.
    Sharma A; Gupta G; Nishadham V; Malik A; Kumar A; Pasricha S; Kamboj M; Durga G; Mehta A
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2024 Aug; 71():152308. PubMed ID: 38640807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality Assurance in Breast Pathology: Lessons Learned From a Review of Amended Reports.
    Harrison BT; Dillon DA; Richardson AL; Brock JE; Guidi AJ; Lester SC
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2017 Feb; 141(2):260-266. PubMed ID: 27959581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Error detection in anatomic pathology.
    Zarbo RJ; Meier FA; Raab SS
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Oct; 129(10):1237-45. PubMed ID: 16196511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring the value of review of pathology material by a second pathologist.
    Renshaw AA; Gould EW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 May; 125(5):737-9. PubMed ID: 16707375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic error in medicine: analysis of 583 physician-reported errors.
    Schiff GD; Hasan O; Kim S; Abrams R; Cosby K; Lambert BL; Elstein AS; Hasler S; Kabongo ML; Krosnjar N; Odwazny R; Wisniewski MF; McNutt RA
    Arch Intern Med; 2009 Nov; 169(20):1881-7. PubMed ID: 19901140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Errors in Surgical Pathology Reports: a Study from a Major Center in Pakistan.
    Ahmad Z; Idrees R; Uddin N; Ahmed A; Fatima S
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(4):1869-74. PubMed ID: 27221868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interobserver variation in the histopathologic reporting of key prognostic parameters, particularly clark level, affects pathologic staging of primary cutaneous melanoma.
    Murali R; Hughes MT; Fitzgerald P; Thompson JF; Scolyer RA
    Ann Surg; 2009 Apr; 249(4):641-7. PubMed ID: 19300224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of a new method in reaching consensus on the cause of cytologic-histologic correlation discrepancy.
    Raab SS; Stone CH; Wojcik EM; Geisinger KR; Dahmoush L; Garcia FU; Grzybicki DM; Janosky JE; Meier FA; Zarbo RJ
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Dec; 126(6):836-42. PubMed ID: 17074685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic errors in patients dying in hospital: radiology's contribution.
    Heriot GS; McKelvie P; Pitman AG
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Apr; 53(2):188-93. PubMed ID: 19527365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Central pathology review in multicenter trials and studies: lessons from the nephroblastoma trials.
    Vujanić GM; Sandstedt B; Kelsey A; Sebire NJ
    Cancer; 2009 May; 115(9):1977-83. PubMed ID: 19241454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Critical values in surgical pathology.
    Pereira TC; Liu Y; Silverman JF
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2004 Aug; 122(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 15323136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical significance of non-diagnostic pathology results from percutaneous transthoracic needle lung biopsy: experience of a tertiary hospital without an on-site cytopathologist.
    Min JW; Lee SM; Chung DH; Yim JJ; Yang SC; Yoo CG; Kim YW; Han SK; Shim YS; Chung HS
    Respirology; 2009 Sep; 14(7):1042-50. PubMed ID: 19740264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can the Misinterpretation Amendment Rate Be Used as a Measure of Interpretive Error in Anatomic Pathology?: Implications of a Survey of the Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology.
    Parkash V; Fadare O; Dewar R; Nakhleh R; Cooper K
    Adv Anat Pathol; 2017 Mar; 24(2):82-87. PubMed ID: 28181951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.