These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18630211)
1. Misconceptions about narco analysis. Mohan BM Indian J Med Ethics; 2007; 4(1):7-8; discussion 10-1. PubMed ID: 18630211 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Narco analysis leads to more questions than answers. Jagadeesh N Indian J Med Ethics; 2007; 4(1):9; discussion 10-1. PubMed ID: 18630212 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating videotaped confessions: expertise provides no defense against the camera-perspective effect. Daniel Lassiter G; Diamond SS; Schmidt HC; Elek JK Psychol Sci; 2007 Mar; 18(3):224-6. PubMed ID: 17444917 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Methodological aspects of polygraph testing in the course of judicial proceedings]. Vvedenskiĭ GE; Tkachenko AA; Sekerazh TN Sud Med Ekspert; 2009; 52(3):36-9. PubMed ID: 19569540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Polygraphy evidence: a temporary setback or closure? Freckelton I J Law Med; 2004 Nov; 12(2):150-5. PubMed ID: 15575315 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Drug screening and criminal prosecution of pregnant women. Foley EM J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2002; 31(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 11926395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Still HOPEful: Reconsidering a "failed" replication of a swift, certain, and fair approach to reducing substance use among individuals under criminal justice supervision. Humphreys K; Kilmer B Addiction; 2020 Oct; 115(10):1973-1977. PubMed ID: 32281705 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Forensic psychophysiological expertise with application of polygraph]. Gurgenidze EV; Komissarova IaV Sud Med Ekspert; 2007; 50(3):20-2. PubMed ID: 17598443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Unjustifiable Means: The Inside Story of How the CIA, Pentagon, and US Government Conspired to Torture, by Mark Fallon. Xenakis SN Torture; 2019; 29(2):108-109. PubMed ID: 31670710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is obtaining an arrestee's DNA a valid special needs search under the fourth amendment? What should (and will) the Supreme Court do? Maclin T J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(1):102-24. PubMed ID: 15938073 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A problematic Israeli High Court dismissal of a torture complaint. A commentary by Hans Draminsky Petersen, MD. Draminsky Petersen H Torture; 2019; 29(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 31670708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Access denied: institutional barriers to justice for victims of torture in Egypt. Khalil HM Torture; 2013; 23(1):28-46. PubMed ID: 23831816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The rights of pregnant women: the Supreme Court and drug testing. Gostin LO Hastings Cent Rep; 2001; 31(5):8-9. PubMed ID: 12974111 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Willing participants and tolerant profession: medical ethics and human rights in narco-analysis. Jesani A Indian J Med Ethics; 2008; 5(3):130-5. PubMed ID: 18754239 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. How do you say Istanbul Protocol in Hebrew? The curious case of Mr Firas Tbeish. Shir E Torture; 2019; 29(2):90-95. PubMed ID: 31670707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is pentobarbital analgesic in the rat formalin test? Goto T; Takahashi H; Yanagida H Anesthesiology; 1997 Jan; 86(1):265-7. PubMed ID: 9009969 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The legislative scheme of pre-trial destruction or lawful disposal of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances in India. Tewari RK Bull Narc; 1992; 44(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 1477700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Not devoid of forensic potential, but.. Allen JJ Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jan; 8(1):27-8; discussion W1-4. PubMed ID: 18236331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Brain imaging and the Bill of Rights: memory detection technologies and American criminal justice. Fox D Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jan; 8(1):34-6; discussion W1-4. PubMed ID: 18236335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Sex offender management using the polygraph: a critical review. Meijer EH; Verschuere B; Merckelbach HL; Crombez G Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):423-9. PubMed ID: 18789528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]