These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1863395)

  • 1. Adult age differences in letter-level and word-level processing.
    Allen PA; Madden DJ; Crozier LC
    Psychol Aging; 1991 Jun; 6(2):261-71. PubMed ID: 1863395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of age and processing stage on visual word recognition.
    Allen PA; Madden DJ; Weber TA; Groth KE
    Psychol Aging; 1993 Jun; 8(2):274-82. PubMed ID: 8323730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adult age differences in the effects of sentence context and stimulus degradation during visual word recognition.
    Madden DJ
    Psychol Aging; 1988 Jun; 3(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 3268255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual word recognition without central attention: evidence for greater automaticity with advancing age.
    Lien MC; Allen PA; Ruthruff E; Grabbe J; McCann RS; Remington RW
    Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):431-47. PubMed ID: 16953708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of valence on young and older adults' attention in a rapid serial visual presentation task.
    Steinmetz KR; Muscatell KA; Kensinger EA
    Psychol Aging; 2010 Mar; 25(1):239-45. PubMed ID: 20230144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of encoding difficulty, word frequency, and phonological regularity on age differences in word naming.
    Allen PA; Bucur B; Grabbe J; Work T; Madden DJ
    Exp Aging Res; 2011 May; 37(3):261-92. PubMed ID: 21534029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence for a parallel input serial analysis model of word processing.
    Allen PA; Madden DJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Feb; 16(1):48-64. PubMed ID: 2137523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attentional resource demands of visual word recognition in naming and lexical decisions.
    Herdman CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 May; 18(2):460-70. PubMed ID: 1593230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lexical factors in the word-superiority effect.
    Hildebrandt N; Caplan D; Sokol S; Torreano L
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Jan; 23(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 7885263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. General slowing in semantic priming and word recognition.
    Myerson J; Ferraro FR; Hale S; Lima SD
    Psychol Aging; 1992 Jun; 7(2):257-70. PubMed ID: 1610515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The time course of the lowercase advantage in visual word recognition: An ERP investigation.
    Vergara-Martínez M; Perea M; Leone-Fernandez B
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Sep; 146():107556. PubMed ID: 32682796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of length and transposed-letter similarity in lexical decision: evidence with beginning, intermediate, and adult readers.
    Acha J; Perea M
    Br J Psychol; 2008 May; 99(Pt 2):245-64. PubMed ID: 17631694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition.
    Yap MJ; Balota DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):274-96. PubMed ID: 17352611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the additive effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in lexical decision: evidence for opposing interactive influences revealed by RT distributional analyses.
    Yap MJ; Balota DA; Tse CS; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):495-513. PubMed ID: 18444751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of age and word frequency on Korean visual word recognition: Evidence from a web-based large-scale lexical-decision task.
    Baek H; Gordon PC; Choi W
    Psychol Aging; 2024 May; 39(3):231-244. PubMed ID: 38236269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distinguishing common and task-specific processes in word identification: a matter of some moment?
    Andrews S; Heathcote A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Mar; 27(2):514-44. PubMed ID: 11294447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of imagery ability on letter-level and word-level processing.
    Allen PA; Wallace B; Waag E
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Mar; 49(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 2011466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: word frequency effects and individual differences.
    Schilling HH; Rayner K; Chumbley JI
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Nov; 26(6):1270-81. PubMed ID: 9847550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of affective words on lexical decision task in major depression.
    Stip E; Lecours AR; Chertkow H; Elie R; O'Connor K
    J Psychiatry Neurosci; 1994 May; 19(3):202-7. PubMed ID: 8031744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A dissociative word-frequency X levels-of-processing interaction in episodic recognition and lexical decision tasks.
    Duchek JM; Neely JH
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Mar; 17(2):148-62. PubMed ID: 2927313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.