1262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18634766)
1. Distortions in the brain? ERP effects of caricaturing familiar and unfamiliar faces.
Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR
Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1228():177-88. PubMed ID: 18634766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The faces you remember: caricaturing shape facilitates brain processes reflecting the acquisition of new face representations.
Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR
Biol Psychol; 2012 Jan; 89(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 21925235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of anticaricaturing vs. caricaturing and their neural correlates elucidate a role of shape for face learning.
Schulz C; Kaufmann JM; Walther L; Schweinberger SR
Neuropsychologia; 2012 Aug; 50(10):2426-34. PubMed ID: 22750120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characterizing the spatio-temporal dynamics of the neural events occurring prior to and up to overt recognition of famous faces.
Jemel B; Schuller AM; Goffaux V
J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 22(10):2289-305. PubMed ID: 19642891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Caricature generalization benefits for faces learned with enhanced idiosyncratic shape or texture.
Itz ML; Schweinberger SR; Kaufmann JM
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2017 Feb; 17(1):185-197. PubMed ID: 27718208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. N250 ERP correlates of the acquisition of face representations across different images.
Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR; Burton AM
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 18702593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exploring the functional architecture of person recognition system with event-related potentials in a within- and cross-domain self-priming of faces.
Jemel B; Pisani M; Rousselle L; Crommelinck M; Bruyer R
Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(14):2024-40. PubMed ID: 16243050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of inversion and eye displacements of familiar and unknown faces on early and late-stage ERPs.
Caharel S; Fiori N; Bernard C; Lalonde R; Rebaï M
Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Oct; 62(1):141-51. PubMed ID: 16678927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High and low performers differ in the use of shape information for face recognition.
Kaufmann JM; Schulz C; Schweinberger SR
Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1310-9. PubMed ID: 23562837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Putting a name to a face: the role of name labels in the formation of face memories.
Gordon I; Tanaka JW
J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Nov; 23(11):3280-93. PubMed ID: 21557646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early electrophysiological correlates of adaptation to personally familiar and unfamiliar faces across viewpoint changes.
Caharel S; Jacques C; d'Arripe O; Ramon M; Rossion B
Brain Res; 2011 Apr; 1387():85-98. PubMed ID: 21362409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Face recognition memory and configural processing: a developmental ERP study using upright, inverted, and contrast-reversed faces.
Itier RJ; Taylor MJ
J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Apr; 16(3):487-502. PubMed ID: 15072683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recognition memory for unfamiliar faces in Parkinson's disease: behavioral and electrophysiologic measures.
Kida Y; Tachibana H; Takeda M; Yoshikawa H; Okita T
Parkinsonism Relat Disord; 2007 Apr; 13(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 17129744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The age of the beholder: ERP evidence of an own-age bias in face memory.
Wiese H; Schweinberger SR; Hansen K
Neuropsychologia; 2008 Oct; 46(12):2973-85. PubMed ID: 18602408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neural correlates of facilitations in face learning by selective caricaturing of facial shape or reflectance.
Itz ML; Schweinberger SR; Schulz C; Kaufmann JM
Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 102 Pt 2():736-47. PubMed ID: 25173417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrophysiological evidence for temporal dissociation between spatial attention and sensory competition during human face processing.
Jacques C; Rossion B
Cereb Cortex; 2007 May; 17(5):1055-65. PubMed ID: 16772314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How multiple repetitions influence the processing of self-, famous and unknown names and faces: an ERP study.
Tacikowski P; Jednoróg K; Marchewka A; Nowicka A
Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Feb; 79(2):219-30. PubMed ID: 21035509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early ERP components differentially extract facial features: evidence for spatial frequency-and-contrast detectors.
Nakashima T; Kaneko K; Goto Y; Abe T; Mitsudo T; Ogata K; Makinouchi A; Tobimatsu S
Neurosci Res; 2008 Dec; 62(4):225-35. PubMed ID: 18809442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What's special about personally familiar faces? A multimodal approach.
Herzmann G; Schweinberger SR; Sommer W; Jentzsch I
Psychophysiology; 2004 Sep; 41(5):688-701. PubMed ID: 15318875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The M170 reflects a viewpoint-dependent representation for both familiar and unfamiliar faces.
Ewbank MP; Smith WA; Hancock ER; Andrews TJ
Cereb Cortex; 2008 Feb; 18(2):364-70. PubMed ID: 17507454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
