BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18635222)

  • 1. External validation of the updated Partin tables in a cohort of North American men.
    Karakiewicz PI; Bhojani N; Capitanio U; Reuther AM; Suardi N; Jeldres C; Pharand D; Péloquin F; Perrotte P; Shariat SF; Klein EA
    J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):898-902; discussion 902-3. PubMed ID: 18635222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. External validation of the updated partin tables in a cohort of French and Italian men.
    Bhojani N; Salomon L; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Shariat SF; Jeldres C; Zini L; Pharand D; Péloquin F; Arjane P; Abbou CC; De La Taille A; Montorsi F; Karakiewicz PI
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Feb; 73(2):347-52. PubMed ID: 19004573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of accuracy between the Partin tables of 1997 and 2001 to predict final pathological stage in clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Augustin H; Eggert T; Wenske S; Karakiewicz PI; Palisaar J; Daghofer F; Huland H; Graefen M
    J Urol; 2004 Jan; 171(1):177-81. PubMed ID: 14665871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of Partin tables and development of a preoperative nomogram for Japanese patients with clinically localized prostate cancer using 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus on Gleason grading: data from the Clinicopathological Research Group for Localized Prostate Cancer.
    Naito S; Kuroiwa K; Kinukawa N; Goto K; Koga H; Ogawa O; Murai M; Shiraishi T;
    J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):904-9; discussion 909-10. PubMed ID: 18635221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multi-institutional external validation of seminal vesicle invasion nomograms: head-to-head comparison of Gallina nomogram versus 2007 Partin tables.
    Zorn KC; Capitanio U; Jeldres C; Arjane P; Perrotte P; Shariat SF; Lee DI; Shalhav AL; Zagaja GP; Shikanov SA; Gofrit ON; Thong AE; Albala DM; Sun L; Karakiewicz PI
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Apr; 73(5):1461-7. PubMed ID: 18938046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Partin Tables cannot accurately predict the pathological stage at radical prostatectomy.
    Bhojani N; Ahyai S; Graefen M; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Shariat SF; Jeldres C; Erbersdobler A; Schlomm T; Haese A; Steuber T; Heinzer H; Montorsi F; Huland H; Karakiewicz PI
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 Feb; 35(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 18786800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of Partin tables for predicting pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Partin AW; Walsh PC; Kattan MW; Scardino PT; Montie JE; Pearson JD; Slezak JM; Zincke H
    J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1591-5. PubMed ID: 11025711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. External validation of the 2007 and 2001 Partin tables in Irish prostate cancer patients.
    Fanning DM; Fan Y; Fitzpatrick JM; Watson RW
    Urol Int; 2010; 84(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 20215821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of accuracy among three generations of Partin tables in a Chinese cohort.
    Xiao WJ; Ye DW; Yao XD; Zhang SL; Dai B; Wang CF; Wang J; Zhang HL; Shen YJ; Zhu Y; Zhu YP; Shi GH; Ma CG; Qin XJ; Lin GW
    Can J Urol; 2011 Apr; 18(2):5619-24. PubMed ID: 21504650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The newer the better? Comparison of the 1997 and 2001 partin tables for pathologic stage prediction of prostate cancer in China.
    Gao X; Ren S; Lu X; Xu C; Sun Y
    Urology; 2008 Nov; 72(5):1096-101. PubMed ID: 18822453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transition zone cancers undermine the predictive accuracy of Partin table stage predictions.
    Steuber T; Karakiewicz PI; Augustin H; Erbersdobler A; Lange I; Haese A; Chun KH; Walz J; Graefen M; Huland H
    J Urol; 2005 Mar; 173(3):737-41. PubMed ID: 15711259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of 1997 Partin Tables' lymph node invasion predictions in men treated with radical prostatectomy in Montreal Quebec.
    Karakiewicz PI; Lattouf JB; Perrotte P; Valiquette L; Bénard F; McCormack M; Ménard C; Lebeau T; Benayoun S; Ramirez A; Ouaknine S; Saad F
    Can J Urol; 2005 Apr; 12(2):2588-92. PubMed ID: 15877940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Head-to-head comparison of three commonly used preoperative tools for prediction of lymph node invasion at radical prostatectomy.
    Abdollah F; Schmitges J; Sun M; Thuret R; Djahangirian O; Tian Z; Shariat SF; Briganti A; Perrotte P; Montorsi F; Karakiewicz PI
    Urology; 2011 Dec; 78(6):1363-7. PubMed ID: 22137704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of 2001 Partin tables in Turkey: a multicenter study.
    Eskicorapci SY; Karabulut E; Türkeri L; Baltaci S; Cal C; Toktas G; Akpinar H; Ozer G; Sozen S; Tokuc R; Lekili M; Soylu A; Albayrak S; Sahin H; Alpar R; Ozen H
    Eur Urol; 2005 Feb; 47(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 15661412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combined endorectal and phased-array MRI in the prediction of pelvic lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer.
    Wang L; Hricak H; Kattan MW; Schwartz LH; Eberhardt SC; Chen HN; Scardino PT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Mar; 186(3):743-8. PubMed ID: 16498101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Head to head comparison of nomograms predicting probability of lymph node invasion of prostate cancer in patients undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection.
    Walz J; Bladou F; Rousseau B; Laroche J; Salem N; Gravis G; Briganti A; Chun FK; Karakiewicz PI; Fournier G
    Urology; 2012 Mar; 79(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 22386393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Population-Based External Validation of the Updated 2012 Partin Tables in Contemporary North American Prostate Cancer Patients.
    Leyh-Bannurah SR; Gazdovich S; Budäus L; Zaffuto E; Dell'Oglio P; Briganti A; Abdollah F; Montorsi F; Schiffmann J; Menon M; Shariat SF; Fisch M; Chun F; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
    Prostate; 2017 Jan; 77(1):105-113. PubMed ID: 27683103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The probability of Gleason score upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy can be accurately predicted.
    Capitanio U; Karakiewicz PI; Jeldres C; Briganti A; Gallina A; Suardi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Salonia A; Montorsi F
    Int J Urol; 2009 May; 16(5):526-9. PubMed ID: 19389085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of the partin nomogram for prostate cancer in a national sample.
    Yu JB; Makarov DV; Sharma R; Peschel RE; Partin AW; Gross CP
    J Urol; 2010 Jan; 183(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 19913246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictive ability of partin tables 2001 in a Welsh population.
    Ayyathurai R; Ananthakrishnan K; Rajasundaram R; Knight RJ; Toussi H; Srinivasan V
    Urol Int; 2006; 76(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 16601382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.