These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

558 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18635846)

  • 1. The stroke impact scale 3.0: evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity of the Brazilian version.
    Carod-Artal FJ; Coral LF; Trizotto DS; Moreira CM
    Stroke; 2008 Sep; 39(9):2477-84. PubMed ID: 18635846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the stroke-adapted 30-item Sickness Impact Profile (SIP30-AI)].
    Carod-Artal FJ; González-Gutiérrez JL; Egido-Herrero JA; Varela de Seijas E
    Rev Neurol; 2007 Dec 1-15; 45(11):647-54. PubMed ID: 18050095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Psychometric comparisons of four disease-specific health-related quality of life measures for stroke survivors.
    Chou CY; Ou YC; Chiang TR
    Clin Rehabil; 2015 Aug; 29(8):816-29. PubMed ID: 25352615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Self- and proxy-report agreement on the Stroke Impact Scale.
    Carod-Artal FJ; Ferreira Coral L; Stieven Trizotto D; Menezes Moreira C
    Stroke; 2009 Oct; 40(10):3308-14. PubMed ID: 19661469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Stroke Impact Scale Version 3.0].
    Ochi M; Ohashi H; Hachisuka K; Saeki S
    J UOEH; 2017; 39(3):215-221. PubMed ID: 28904272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality of life in stroke survivors: first results from the reliability and validity of the Italian version of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0.
    Vellone E; Savini S; Barbato N; Carovillano G; Caramia M; Alvaro R
    Ann Ig; 2010; 22(5):469-79. PubMed ID: 21381542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determinants of quality of life in Brazilian stroke survivors.
    Carod-Artal FJ; Trizotto DS; Coral LF; Moreira CM
    J Neurol Sci; 2009 Sep; 284(1-2):63-8. PubMed ID: 19411080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of the Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL): test of reliability and validity of the Danish version (SS-QOL-DK).
    Muus I; Williams LS; Ringsberg KC
    Clin Rehabil; 2007 Jul; 21(7):620-7. PubMed ID: 17702704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of proxy responses to the Stroke Impact Scale.
    Duncan PW; Lai SM; Tyler D; Perera S; Reker DM; Studenski S
    Stroke; 2002 Nov; 33(11):2593-9. PubMed ID: 12411648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Psychometric evaluation of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0.
    Vellone E; Savini S; Fida R; Dickson VV; Melkus GD; Carod-Artal FJ; Rocco G; Alvaro R
    J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2015; 30(3):229-41. PubMed ID: 24695074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychometric properties of the short form of the Stroke Impact Scale in German-speaking stroke survivors.
    Coppers A; Möller JC; Marks D
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 Jul; 19(1):190. PubMed ID: 34332592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stroke Impact Scale 3.0: Reliability and Validity Evaluation of the Korean Version.
    Choi SU; Lee HS; Shin JH; Ho SH; Koo MJ; Park KH; Yoon JA; Kim DM; Oh JE; Yu SH; Kim DA
    Ann Rehabil Med; 2017 Jun; 41(3):387-393. PubMed ID: 28758075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change.
    Duncan PW; Wallace D; Lai SM; Johnson D; Embretson S; Laster LJ
    Stroke; 1999 Oct; 30(10):2131-40. PubMed ID: 10512918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Independent validation of SCOPA-psychosocial and metric properties of the PDQ-39 Brazilian version.
    Carod-Artal FJ; Martinez-Martin P; Vargas AP
    Mov Disord; 2007 Jan; 22(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 17094102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 (SAQOL-39): evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity.
    Hilari K; Byng S; Lamping DL; Smith SC
    Stroke; 2003 Aug; 34(8):1944-50. PubMed ID: 12855827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability and validity of COOP/WONCA functional health status charts for stroke patients in primary care.
    Lennon OC; Carey A; Creed A; Durcan S; Blake C
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2011; 20(5):465-73. PubMed ID: 20813545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stroke impact scale version 2: validation of the French version.
    Caël S; Decavel P; Binquet C; Benaim C; Puyraveau M; Chotard M; Moulin T; Parratte B; Bejot Y; Mercier M
    Phys Ther; 2015 May; 95(5):778-90. PubMed ID: 25476718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the Stroke Impact Scale.
    Duncan PW; Bode RK; Min Lai S; Perera S;
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Jul; 84(7):950-63. PubMed ID: 12881816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Test-retest reproducibility and smallest real difference of 5 hand function tests in patients with stroke.
    Chen HM; Chen CC; Hsueh IP; Huang SL; Hsieh CL
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2009 Jun; 23(5):435-40. PubMed ID: 19261767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability and validity of the Manual Function Test in patients with stroke.
    Miyamoto S; Kondo T; Suzukamo Y; Michimata A; Izumi S
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Mar; 88(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 19106794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.