361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18635897)
1. Quantitative assessment of the physical potential of proton beam range verification with PET/CT.
Knopf A; Parodi K; Paganetti H; Cascio E; Bonab A; Bortfeld T
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 53(15):4137-51. PubMed ID: 18635897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Systematic analysis of biological and physical limitations of proton beam range verification with offline PET/CT scans.
Knopf A; Parodi K; Bortfeld T; Shih HA; Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 54(14):4477-95. PubMed ID: 19556685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of uncertainties in the CT conversion algorithm when predicting proton beam ranges in patients from dose and PET-activity distributions.
España S; Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Dec; 55(24):7557-71. PubMed ID: 21098912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PET/CT imaging for treatment verification after proton therapy: a study with plastic phantoms and metallic implants.
Parodi K; Paganetti H; Cascio E; Flanz JB; Bonab AA; Alpert NM; Lohmann K; Bortfeld T
Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):419-35. PubMed ID: 17388158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An experimental approach to improve the Monte Carlo modelling of offline PET/CT-imaging of positron emitters induced by scanned proton beams.
Bauer J; Unholtz D; Kurz C; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Aug; 58(15):5193-213. PubMed ID: 23835872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A filtering approach based on Gaussian-powerlaw convolutions for local PET verification of proton radiotherapy.
Parodi K; Bortfeld T
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 51(8):1991-2009. PubMed ID: 16585841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between in-beam and offline positron emission tomography imaging of proton and carbon ion therapeutic irradiation at synchrotron- and cyclotron-based facilities.
Parodi K; Bortfeld T; Haberer T
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jul; 71(3):945-56. PubMed ID: 18514787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Absolute dose reconstruction in proton therapy using PET imaging modality: feasibility study.
Fourkal E; Fan J; Veltchev I
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 54(11):N217-28. PubMed ID: 19436106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Monte Carlo investigation of collimator scatter of proton-therapy beams produced using the passive scattering method.
Titt U; Zheng Y; Vassiliev ON; Newhauser WD
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(2):487-504. PubMed ID: 18185001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Proton range verification using a range probe: definition of concept and initial analysis.
Mumot M; Algranati C; Hartmann M; Schippers JM; Hug E; Lomax AJ
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4771-82. PubMed ID: 20679697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy.
Paganetti H; Jiang H; Parodi K; Slopsema R; Engelsman M
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4825-53. PubMed ID: 18701772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Monte Carlo patient study on the comparison of prompt gamma and PET imaging for range verification in proton therapy.
Moteabbed M; España S; Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Feb; 56(4):1063-82. PubMed ID: 21263174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. PET monitoring of cancer therapy with 3He and 12C beams: a study with the GEANT4 toolkit.
Pshenichnov I; Larionov A; Mishustin I; Greiner W
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(24):7295-312. PubMed ID: 18065840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Determination of the weighted CT dose index in modern multi-detector CT scanners.
Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Tzedakis A; Papadakis A; Theocharopoulos N; Gourtsoyiannis N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 52(21):6485-95. PubMed ID: 17951857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dual-energy CT-based material extraction for tissue segmentation in Monte Carlo dose calculations.
Bazalova M; Carrier JF; Beaulieu L; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2008 May; 53(9):2439-56. PubMed ID: 18421124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigating the accuracy of the FLUKA code for transport of therapeutic ion beams in matter.
Sommerer F; Parodi K; Ferrari A; Poljanc K; Enghardt W; Aiginger H
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Sep; 51(17):4385-98. PubMed ID: 16912388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of a Monte Carlo simulation of the Philips Allegro/GEMINI PET systems using GATE.
Lamare F; Turzo A; Bizais Y; Le Rest CC; Visvikis D
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 51(4):943-62. PubMed ID: 16467589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spatial correlation of proton irradiation-induced activity and dose in polymer gel phantoms for PET/CT delivery verification studies.
Lopatiuk-Tirpak O; Su Z; Li Z; Hsi W; Meeks S; Zeidan O
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6483-8. PubMed ID: 22149831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Feasibility study of using fall-off gradients of early and late PET scans for proton range verification.
Cho J; Grogg K; Min CH; Zhu X; Paganetti H; Lee HC; El Fakhri G
Med Phys; 2017 May; 44(5):1734-1746. PubMed ID: 28273345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient study of in vivo verification of beam delivery and range, using positron emission tomography and computed tomography imaging after proton therapy.
Parodi K; Paganetti H; Shih HA; Michaud S; Loeffler JS; DeLaney TF; Liebsch NJ; Munzenrider JE; Fischman AJ; Knopf A; Bortfeld T
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Jul; 68(3):920-34. PubMed ID: 17544003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]