537 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18636976)
1. Sexual selection, sexual size dimorphism and Rensch's rule in Odonata.
Serrano-Meneses MA; Córdoba-Aguilar A; Azpilicueta-Amorín M; González-Soriano E; Székely T
J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1259-73. PubMed ID: 18636976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in grouse and allies (Aves: Phasianidae) in relation to mating competition, fecundity demands and resource division.
Lislevand T; Figuerola J; Székely T
J Evol Biol; 2009 Sep; 22(9):1895-905. PubMed ID: 19682306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evolution of sexual size dimorphisms in emydid turtles: ecological dimorphism, rensch's rule, and sympatric divergence.
Stephens PR; Wiens JJ
Evolution; 2009 Apr; 63(4):910-25. PubMed ID: 19210531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rensch's rule inverted--female-driven gigantism in nine-spined stickleback Pungitius pungitius.
Herczeg G; Gonda A; Merilä J
J Anim Ecol; 2010 May; 79(3):581-8. PubMed ID: 20202005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Proximate causes of Rensch's rule: does sexual size dimorphism in arthropods result from sex differences in development time?
Blanckenhorn WU; Dixon AF; Fairbairn DJ; Foellmer MW; Gibert P; van der Linde K; Meier R; Nylin S; Pitnick S; Schoff C; Signorelli M; Teder T; Wiklund C
Am Nat; 2007 Feb; 169(2):245-57. PubMed ID: 17211807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sexual dichromatism in wing pigmentation of New World dragonflies follows Rensch's rule.
Santos ES; Machado G
J Evol Biol; 2016 Jul; 29(7):1447-54. PubMed ID: 27169873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: testing two hypotheses for Rensch's rule in the water strider Aquarius remigis.
Fairbairn DJ
Am Nat; 2005 Oct; 166 Suppl 4():S69-84. PubMed ID: 16224713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sexual size dimorphism in a Drosophila clade, the D. obscura group.
Huey RB; Moreteau B; Moreteau JC; Gibert P; Gilchrist GW; Ives AR; Garland T; David JR
Zoology (Jena); 2006; 109(4):318-30. PubMed ID: 16978850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Andrew meets Rensch: sexual size dimorphism and the inverse of Rensch's rule in Andrew's toad (Bufo andrewsi).
Liao WB; Liu WC; Merilä J
Oecologia; 2015 Feb; 177(2):389-99. PubMed ID: 25407623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Alternative mating strategies and the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in the side-blotched lizard, Uta stansburiana: a population-level comparative analysis.
Corl A; Davis AR; Kuchta SR; Comendant T; Sinervo B
Evolution; 2010 Jan; 64(1):79-96. PubMed ID: 19659598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ecological divergence and sexual selection drive sexual size dimorphism in New World pitvipers (Serpentes: Viperidae).
Hendry CR; Guiher TJ; Pyron RA
J Evol Biol; 2014 Apr; 27(4):760-71. PubMed ID: 24597708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Macroevolutionary pattern of sexual size dimorphism in geckos corresponds to intraspecific temperature-induced variation.
Starostová Z; Kubicka L; Kratochvíl L
J Evol Biol; 2010 Apr; 23(4):670-7. PubMed ID: 20487136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Allometry of sexual size dimorphism in dioecious plants: do plants obey Rensch's rule?
Kavanagh PH; Lehnebach CA; Shea MJ; Burns KC
Am Nat; 2011 Nov; 178(5):596-601. PubMed ID: 22030729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lack of support for Rensch's rule in an intraspecific test using red flour beetle (Tribolium castaneum) populations.
Martin OY; Michalczyk Ł; Millard AL; Emerson BC; Gage MJ
Insect Sci; 2017 Feb; 24(1):133-140. PubMed ID: 26299521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlated evolution of allometry and sexual dimorphism across higher taxa.
De Lisle SP; Rowe L
Am Nat; 2013 Nov; 182(5):630-9. PubMed ID: 24107370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can sexual selection drive female life histories? A comparative study on Galliform birds.
Kolm N; Stein RW; Mooers AØ; Verspoor JJ; Cunningham EJ
J Evol Biol; 2007 Mar; 20(2):627-38. PubMed ID: 17305829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A test of Rensch's rule in greater horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum) with female-biased sexual size dimorphism.
Wu H; Jiang T; Huang X; Lin H; Wang H; Wang L; Niu H; Feng J
PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e86085. PubMed ID: 24465886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Phylogeny suggests nondirectional and isometric evolution of sexual size dimorphism in argiopine spiders.
Cheng RC; Kuntner M
Evolution; 2014 Oct; 68(10):2861-72. PubMed ID: 25130435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. When Rensch meets Bergmann: does sexual size dimorphism change systematically with latitude?
Blanckenhorn WU; Stillwell RC; Young KA; Fox CW; Ashton KG
Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):2004-11. PubMed ID: 17133857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Only half right: species with female-biased sexual size dimorphism consistently break Rensch's rule.
Webb TJ; Freckleton RP
PLoS One; 2007 Sep; 2(9):e897. PubMed ID: 17878932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
