267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18637293)
1. Ghostwriting.
Cheson B
Clin Adv Hematol Oncol; 2008 May; 6(5):318. PubMed ID: 18637293
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Commentary: What's wrong with ghostwriting?
Elliott C; Landa AS
Bioethics; 2010 Jul; 24(6):284-6. PubMed ID: 20497172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Copy is fraudulent--but what is the consequence?].
Nielsen OH; Schroeder TV
Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 Nov; 168(45):3891. PubMed ID: 17118247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. How original is your writing?
McClelland H
Accid Emerg Nurs; 2006 Jul; 14(3):131-2. PubMed ID: 16815015
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Demystifying the writing process.
Kline NE
J Pediatr Oncol Nurs; 2005; 22(1):7. PubMed ID: 15574721
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Ghostwriting].
Haug C
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 May; 128(9):1039. PubMed ID: 18451881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Writing and reading scientific texts].
Kuss E; Zander J
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1995 Jul; 55(7):414-24. PubMed ID: 7557211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Plagiarism.
Covan EK
Health Care Women Int; 2009; 30(1-2):2-3. PubMed ID: 19116817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A letter of rejection.
Flowers KR
J Hand Ther; 2006; 19(4):383. PubMed ID: 17056397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Responding to peer reviews: pointers that authors don't learn in school.
Algase DL
Res Theory Nurs Pract; 2008; 22(4):219-21. PubMed ID: 19093658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Letter of apology.
Jegen D
Health Care Women Int; 2009; 30(1-2):4. PubMed ID: 19116818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Plagiarism: an unprofessional and dishonest trend creeping into modern writing of research and review papers.
Stephens MM
Foot Ankle Surg; 2009; 15(2):57. PubMed ID: 19410168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Authorship of peer-reviewed journal publications.
Linger JB; Maxson BB
J Mich Dent Assoc; 2000 Feb; 82(2):32-4. PubMed ID: 11323902
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [The reviewers for the "Revista de Investigación Clínica"].
Ruiz-Argüelles GJ
Rev Invest Clin; 1994; 46(1):77-8. PubMed ID: 8079070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The reviewing process.
Baltzopoulos V
J Sports Sci; 2004 Feb; 22(2):147-8. PubMed ID: 14998092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Duplicate submission, redundant publication and plagiarism are under control].
Léger P
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2009 Jun; 110(3):125-6. PubMed ID: 19481679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Plagiarism criteria ignore the way research evolves.
Sørensen B
Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7047):24. PubMed ID: 16001041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Who really wrote your paper?
Johnson M
Nurse Educ Today; 2006 Jan; 26(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 16338483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Authorship.
Watts C
Surg Neurol; 2009 Jul; 72(1):99. PubMed ID: 19559939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Plagiarism and other scientific misconducts.
Höffken K; Gabbert H
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2009 Mar; 135(3):327-8. PubMed ID: 19125293
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
