383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18637380)
1. Retentive characteristics of Ankylos SynCone conical crown system over long-term use in vitro.
Zhang RG; Hannak WB; Roggensack M; Freesmeyer WB
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2008 Jun; 16(2):61-6. PubMed ID: 18637380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retentive characteristics of overdenture attachments during repeated dislodging and cyclic loading.
Chung KH; Whiting D; Kronstrom M; Chan D; Wataha J
Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(2):127-9. PubMed ID: 21479277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of detachment forces of two implant overdenture attachment types: effect of detachment speed.
Jefferies SR; Boston DW; Damrow MP; Galbraith CT
Am J Dent; 2008 Aug; 21(4):244-50. PubMed ID: 18795521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
Ortegón SM; Thompson GA; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Perdikis D
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs.
Alsabeeha N; Atieh M; Swain MV; Payne AG
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20305857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Resistance to wear of four matrices with ball attachments for implant overdentures: a fatigue study.
Branchi R; Vangi D; Virga A; Guertin G; Fazi G
J Prosthodont; 2010 Dec; 19(8):614-9. PubMed ID: 20546492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of retention and strain energies of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
Petropoulos VC; Mante FK
J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 21539646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retention force changes in implant-supported titanium telescope crowns over long-term use in vitro.
Besimo CH; Graber G; Flühler M
J Oral Rehabil; 1996 Jun; 23(6):372-8. PubMed ID: 8809690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Attachment systems for implant overdenture: influence of implant inclination on retentive and lateral forces.
Yang TC; Maeda Y; Gonda T; Kotecha S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1315-9. PubMed ID: 21426402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cementable implant crowns composed of cast superstructure frameworks luted to electroformed primary copings: an in vitro retention study.
Di Felice R; Rappelli G; Camaioni E; Cattani M; Meyer JM; Belser UC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 17224031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of retention and release periods for implant overdenture attachments.
Petropoulos VC; Smith W; Kousvelari E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 9109267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments.
Petropoulos VC; Smith W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):526-35. PubMed ID: 12182295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of dislodging forces on mandibular implant attachment-retained overdenture.
Elkerdawy MW; Radi IA
Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):246-54. PubMed ID: 21613951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative study of four retentive anchor systems for implant supported overdentures--retention force changes.
Bayer S; Steinheuser D; Grüner M; Keilig L; Enkling N; Stark H; Mues S
Gerodontology; 2009 Dec; 26(4):268-72. PubMed ID: 19371390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: 6-month fatigue retention values.
Doukas D; Michelinakis G; Smith PW; Barclay CW
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 18546771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The change in retentive values of locator attachments and hader clips over time.
Evtimovska E; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
J Prosthodont; 2009 Aug; 18(6):479-83. PubMed ID: 19500236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of the palatal major conccector on the rigidity of a conical crown retained denture.
Pinheiro Fernandes C; Randow K; Svensson A
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1994 Dec; 3(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 8605506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fabrication of a surgical template for implant/bar-retained mandibular overdentures.
Fakhry A
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2005 Aug; 25(4):401-7. PubMed ID: 16089048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of surface topography of implant abutments on retention of cemented single-tooth crowns.
de Campos TN; Adachi LK; Miashiro K; Yoshida H; Shinkai RS; Neto PT; Frigerio ML
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2010 Aug; 30(4):409-13. PubMed ID: 20664843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Force transmission in bar-retained implant-stabilised mandibular over-dentures: an in-vitro study.
el-Sheikh AM; Hobkirk JA
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2002 Dec; 10(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 12526275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
