BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

453 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18637906)

  • 1. Efficiency and concordance of alternative methods for minimizing opportunity costs in conservation planning.
    Cameron SE; Williams KJ; Mitchell DK
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Aug; 22(4):886-96. PubMed ID: 18637906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safeguarding biodiversity and ecosystem services in the Little Karoo, South Africa.
    Egoh BN; Reyers B; Carwardine J; Bode M; O'Farrell PJ; Wilson KA; Possingham HP; Rouget M; de Lange W; Richardson DM; Cowling RM
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Aug; 24(4):1021-30. PubMed ID: 20136871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ecological efficiency of voluntary conservation of boreal-forest biodiversity.
    Mönkkönen M; Ylisirniö AL; Hämäläinen T
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Apr; 23(2):339-47. PubMed ID: 18983601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Costs of integrating economics and conservation planning.
    Arponen A; Cabeza M; Eklund J; Kujala H; Lehtomäki J
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):1198-204. PubMed ID: 20575989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Striking a balance between biodiversity conservation and socioeconomic viability in the design of marine protected areas.
    Klein CJ; Chan A; Kircher L; Cundiff AJ; Gardner N; Hrovat Y; Scholz A; Kendall BE; Airamé S
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Jun; 22(3):691-700. PubMed ID: 18325043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conservation goals and the relative importance of costs and benefits in reserve selection.
    Perhans K; Kindstrand C; Boman M; Djupström LB; Gustafsson L; Mattsson L; Schroeder LM; Weslien J; Wikberg S
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Oct; 22(5):1331-9. PubMed ID: 18637912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conserving biodiversity and ecosystem function through limited development: an empirical evaluation.
    Milder JC; Lassoie JP; Bedford BL
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Feb; 22(1):70-9. PubMed ID: 18254854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conservation planning when costs are uncertain.
    Carwardine J; Wilson KA; Hajkowicz SA; Smith RJ; Klein CJ; Watts M; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Dec; 24(6):1529-37. PubMed ID: 20561000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Designing cost-effective payments for conservation measures to generate spatiotemporal habitat heterogeneity.
    Drechsler M; Johst K; Ohl C; Wätzold F
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Dec; 21(6):1475-86. PubMed ID: 18173471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating the opportunity costs of biodiversity protection in the Brigalow Belt, New South Wales.
    Sinden JA
    J Environ Manage; 2004 Apr; 70(4):351-62. PubMed ID: 15016443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating the potential for conservation development: biophysical, economic, and institutional perspectives.
    Pejchar L; Morgan PM; Caldwell MR; Palmer C; Daily GC
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Feb; 21(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 17298512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Protected areas in Europe: principle and practice.
    Gaston KJ; Jackson SF; Nagy A; Cantú-Salazar L; Johnson M
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008; 1134():97-119. PubMed ID: 18566091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Environmental service payments: evaluating biodiversity conservation trade-offs and cost-efficiency in the Osa Conservation Area, Costa Rica.
    Barton DN; Faith DP; Rusch GM; Acevedo H; Paniagua L; Castro M
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Feb; 90(2):901-11. PubMed ID: 18423841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using cost-effective targeting to enhance the efficiency of conservation investments in payments for ecosystem services.
    Chen X; Lupi F; Viña A; He G; Liu J
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Dec; 24(6):1469-78. PubMed ID: 20586786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of incremental reserve design and changing reservation goals on the long-term efficiency of reserve systems.
    Stewart RR; Ball IR; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Apr; 21(2):346-54. PubMed ID: 17391185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conservation planning with multiple organizations and objectives.
    Bode M; Probert W; Turner WR; Wilson KA; Venter O
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Apr; 25(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 21129029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Integrating economic costs into conservation planning.
    Naidoo R; Balmford A; Ferraro PJ; Polasky S; Ricketts TH; Rouget M
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2006 Dec; 21(12):681-7. PubMed ID: 17050033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conservation businesses and conservation planning in a biological diversity hotspot.
    Di Minin E; Macmillan DC; Goodman PS; Escott B; Slotow R; Moilanen A
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):808-20. PubMed ID: 23565917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of a threatened-species focus on conservation planning.
    Drummond SP; Wilson KA; Meijaard E; Watts M; Dennis R; Christy L; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):441-9. PubMed ID: 19843123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Systematic conservation planning and the cost of tackling conservation conflicts with large carnivores in Italy.
    Rondinini C; Boitani L
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Dec; 21(6):1455-62. PubMed ID: 18173469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.