These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
47. Central corneal thickness and biomechanical changes after clear corneal phacoemulsification. de Freitas Valbon B; Ventura MP; da Silva RS; Canedo AL; Velarde GC; Ambrósio R J Refract Surg; 2012 Mar; 28(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 22107063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Influence of age and gender on corneal biomechanical properties in a healthy Italian population. Strobbe E; Cellini M; Barbaresi U; Campos EC Cornea; 2014 Sep; 33(9):968-72. PubMed ID: 25014149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Identification of biomechanical properties of the cornea: the ocular response analyzer. Terai N; Raiskup F; Haustein M; Pillunat LE; Spoerl E Curr Eye Res; 2012 Jul; 37(7):553-62. PubMed ID: 22559332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Corneal biomechanical properties of patients with acromegaly. Ozkok A; Hatipoglu E; Tamcelik N; Balta B; Gundogdu AS; Ozdamar MA; Kadioglu P Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 May; 98(5):651-7. PubMed ID: 24489375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. Luce DA J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):156-62. PubMed ID: 15721708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Effects of encircling scleral buckling on the morphology and biomechanical properties of the cornea]. Ruiz-De-Gopegui E; Ascaso FJ; Del Buey MA; Cristóbal JA Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2011 Nov; 86(11):363-7. PubMed ID: 22040643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Assessment of corneal biomechanical parameters in myopes and emmetropes using the Corvis ST. Lee R; Chang RT; Wong IY; Lai JS; Lee JW; Singh K Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Mar; 99(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 26893029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Biomechanical evaluation of cornea in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Caglayan M; Sarac O; Kosekahya P; Erten S; Ayan B; Cagil N Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 37(4):1017-1024. PubMed ID: 27709370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Biomechanical profile of the cornea in primary congenital glaucoma. Gatzioufas Z; Labiris G; Stachs O; Hovakimyan M; Schnaidt A; Viestenz A; Käsmann-Kellner B; Seitz B Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 91(1):e29-34. PubMed ID: 22937759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Screening of forme fruste keratoconus with the ocular response analyzer. Schweitzer C; Roberts CJ; Mahmoud AM; Colin J; Maurice-Tison S; Kerautret J Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 May; 51(5):2403-10. PubMed ID: 19907025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Accuracy of Goldmann, ocular response analyser, Pascal and TonoPen XL tonometry in keratoconic and normal eyes. Mollan SP; Wolffsohn JS; Nessim M; Laiquzzaman M; Sivakumar S; Hartley S; Shah S Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Dec; 92(12):1661-5. PubMed ID: 18757471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Comparison of factors that influence the measurement of corneal hysteresis in vivo and in vitro. Alhamad TA; Meek KM Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 Aug; 89(5):e443-50. PubMed ID: 21457485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A pilot study on the corneal biomechanical changes in short-term orthokeratology. Chen D; Lam AK; Cho P Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Jul; 29(4):464-71. PubMed ID: 19523091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]