138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18638602)
1. Comparison of usefulness of tissue Doppler imaging versus brain natriuretic peptide for differentiation of constrictive pericardial disease from restrictive cardiomyopathy.
Sengupta PP; Krishnamoorthy VK; Abhayaratna WP; Korinek J; Belohlavek M; Sundt TM; Chandrasekaran K; Seward JB; Tajik AJ; Khandheria BK
Am J Cardiol; 2008 Aug; 102(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 18638602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The efficacy of brain natriuretic peptide levels in differentiating constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy.
Leya FS; Arab D; Joyal D; Shioura KM; Lewis BE; Steen LH; Cho L
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Jun; 45(11):1900-2. PubMed ID: 15936624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Utility of BNP in differentiating constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy in patients with renal insufficiency.
Reddy PR; Dieter RS; Das P; Steen LH; Lewis BE; Leya FS
J Card Fail; 2007 Oct; 13(8):668-71. PubMed ID: 17923360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incremental value of combining systolic mitral annular velocity and time difference between mitral inflow and diastolic mitral annular velocity to early diastolic annular velocity for differentiating constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy.
Choi EY; Ha JW; Kim JM; Ahn JA; Seo HS; Lee JH; Rim SJ; Chung N
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2007 Jun; 20(6):738-43. PubMed ID: 17543745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differentiation of constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy using mitral annular velocity by tissue Doppler echocardiography.
Ha JW; Ommen SR; Tajik AJ; Barnes ME; Ammash NM; Gertz MA; Seward JB; Oh JK
Am J Cardiol; 2004 Aug; 94(3):316-9. PubMed ID: 15276095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. NT pro B type natriuretic peptide levels in constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy.
Parakh N; Mehrotra S; Seth S; Ramakrishnan S; Kothari SS; Bhargava B; Bahl VK
Indian Heart J; 2015; 67(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 25820049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Disparate patterns of left ventricular mechanics differentiate constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy.
Sengupta PP; Krishnamoorthy VK; Abhayaratna WP; Korinek J; Belohlavek M; Sundt TM; Chandrasekaran K; Mookadam F; Seward JB; Tajik AJ; Khandheria BK
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2008 Jan; 1(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 19356402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Serum NT pro-BNP: relation to systolic and diastolic function in cardiomyopathies and pericardiopathies.
Mady C; Fernandes F; Arteaga E; Ramires FJ; Buck Pde C; Salemi VM; Ianni BM; Nastari L; Dias RR
Arq Bras Cardiol; 2008 Jul; 91(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 18660945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differentiation of constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy: assessment of left ventricular diastolic velocities in longitudinal axis by Doppler tissue imaging.
Garcia MJ; Rodriguez L; Ares M; Griffin BP; Thomas JD; Klein AL
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Jan; 27(1):108-14. PubMed ID: 8522683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mitral and tricuspid annular velocities in constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy: correlation with pericardial thickness on computed tomography.
Choi JH; Choi JO; Ryu DR; Lee SC; Park SW; Choe YH; Oh JK
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Jun; 4(6):567-75. PubMed ID: 21679889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Constrictive pericarditis or restrictive cardiomyopathy? Echocardiographic tissue Doppler analysis].
Butz T; Faber L; Piper C; Langer C; Kottmann T; Schmidt HK; Wiemer M; Körfer R; Horstkotte D
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Feb; 133(9):399-405. PubMed ID: 18288626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using mitral 'annulus reversus' to diagnose constrictive pericarditis.
Reuss CS; Wilansky SM; Lester SJ; Lusk JL; Grill DE; Oh JK; Tajik AJ
Eur J Echocardiogr; 2009 May; 10(3):372-5. PubMed ID: 18952625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy and pitfalls of early diastolic motion of the mitral annulus for diagnosing constrictive pericarditis by tissue Doppler imaging.
Sengupta PP; Mohan JC; Mehta V; Arora R; Pandian NG; Khandheria BK
Am J Cardiol; 2004 Apr; 93(7):886-90. PubMed ID: 15050494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic superiority of a combined assessment of the systolic and early diastolic mitral annular velocities by tissue Doppler imaging for the differentiation of restrictive cardiomyopathy from constrictive pericarditis.
Butz T; Piper C; Langer C; Wiemer M; Kottmann T; Meissner A; Plehn G; Trappe HJ; Horstkotte D; Faber L
Clin Res Cardiol; 2010 Apr; 99(4):207-15. PubMed ID: 20049465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic utility of plasma N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and C-reactive protein levels in differential diagnosis of pericardial constriction and restrictive cardiomyopathy.
Karaahmet T; Yilmaz F; Tigen K; Mutlu B; Cevik C; Basaran Y
Congest Heart Fail; 2009; 15(6):265-70. PubMed ID: 19925504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of new Doppler echocardiographic methods to differentiate constrictive pericardial heart disease and restrictive cardiomyopathy.
Rajagopalan N; Garcia MJ; Rodriguez L; Murray RD; Apperson-Hansen C; Stugaard M; Thomas JD; Klein AL
Am J Cardiol; 2001 Jan; 87(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 11137840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic concordance of echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance-based tissue tracking for differentiating constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy.
Amaki M; Savino J; Ain DL; Sanz J; Pedrizzetti G; Kulkarni H; Narula J; Sengupta PP
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Sep; 7(5):819-27. PubMed ID: 25107553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Utility of B-natriuretic peptide in the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function: comparison with tissue Doppler imaging recordings.
Mak GS; DeMaria A; Clopton P; Maisel AS
Am Heart J; 2004 Nov; 148(5):895-902. PubMed ID: 15523324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differentiation of constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy by Doppler transesophageal echocardiographic measurements of respiratory variations in pulmonary venous flow.
Klein AL; Cohen GI; Pietrolungo JF; White RD; Bailey A; Pearce GL; Stewart WJ; Salcedo EE
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Dec; 22(7):1935-43. PubMed ID: 8245352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [NT pro-BNP levels in pericardial diseases and how they are used as complementary evaluation method of diastolic restriction. Initial experience: 25 cases].
Fernandes F; Almeida IJ; Ramires FJ; Buck PC; Salemi VM; Ianni BM; Rabelo R; Mady C
Arq Bras Cardiol; 2006 Mar; 86(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 16612443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
