269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18639301)
1. Air charged and microtip catheters cannot be used interchangeably for urethral pressure measurement: a prospective, single-blind, randomized trial.
Zehnder P; Roth B; Burkhard FC; Kessler TM
J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):1013-7. PubMed ID: 18639301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized comparison of microtip and air-charged catheter for the measurement of maximum urethral closure pressure.
Mueller MM; Baumann MU; Mueller MD; Kuhn A
Ginekol Pol; 2012 Aug; 83(8):586-9. PubMed ID: 23342881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differences between water-filled and air-charged urodynamic catheters for determining the urethral pressure profile in neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction patients.
Zhao H; Liao L; Deng H; Wang Y
Neurourol Urodyn; 2019 Aug; 38(6):1760-1766. PubMed ID: 31215070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Air-charged and microtransducer urodynamic catheters in the evaluation of urethral function.
Pollak JT; Neimark M; Connor JT; Davila GW
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2004; 15(2):124-8; discussion 128. PubMed ID: 15014940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative study of water perfusion catheters and microtip transducer catheters for urethral pressure measurements.
Kuhn A; Nager CW; Hawkins E; Schulz J; Stanton SL
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2007 Aug; 18(8):931-5. PubMed ID: 17131168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High definition urethral pressure profilometry: Evaluating a novel microtip catheter.
Klünder M; Amend B; Vaegler M; Kelp A; Feuer R; Sievert KD; Stenzl A; Sawodny O; Ederer M
Neurourol Urodyn; 2016 Nov; 35(8):888-894. PubMed ID: 26207994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of urethral profilometry using microtip and fiberoptic catheters.
Elser DM; London W; Fantl JA; McBride MA; Beck RP
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 1999; 10(6):371-4. PubMed ID: 10614972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Recommendations for the urodynamic examination in the investigation of non-neurological female urinary incontinence].
Hermieu JF;
Prog Urol; 2007 Nov; 17(6 Suppl 2):1264-84. PubMed ID: 18214138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of urethral pressure profilometry using microtip and double-lumen perfusion catheters in women with genuine stress incontinence.
Wang AC; Chen MC
BJOG; 2002 Mar; 109(3):322-6. PubMed ID: 11950188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the reproducibility of high definition urethral pressure profilometry and its correlation with an air-charged system.
Klünder M; Amend B; Sawodny O; Stenzl A; Ederer M; Kelp A; Sievert KD; Feuer R
Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Jun; 36(5):1292-1300. PubMed ID: 27574912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Observations on the function of the female urethra: I: relation between maximum urethral closure pressure at rest and urethral hypermobility.
Schick E; Tessier J; Bertrand PE; Dupont C; Jolivet-Tremblay M
Neurourol Urodyn; 2003; 22(7):643-7. PubMed ID: 14595607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 'Simultaneous' urethral pressure profilometry in the bitch: methodology and reproducibility of the technique.
Holt PE
Res Vet Sci; 1989 Jul; 47(1):110-6. PubMed ID: 2772399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproducibility of urethral pressure profiles in clinically normal sexually intact female dogs by use of microtransducer catheters.
Arnold S; Chew DJ; Hubler M; Casal M; Wiestner T; Hogg H; Heckmann R; Powers J; Ruesch P
Am J Vet Res; 1993 Aug; 54(8):1347-51. PubMed ID: 8214908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of tamsulosin on the resting tone and the contractile behaviour of the female urethra: a functional urodynamic study in healthy women.
Reitz A; Haferkamp A; Kyburz T; Knapp PA; Wefer B; Schurch B
Eur Urol; 2004 Aug; 46(2):235-40; discussion 240. PubMed ID: 15245819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of air-charged and water-filled urodynamic pressure measurement catheters.
Cooper MA; Fletter PC; Zaszczurynski PJ; Damaser MS
Neurourol Urodyn; 2011 Mar; 30(3):329-34. PubMed ID: 21305591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Observations on the function of the female urethra: II: Relation between maximum urethral closure pressure at rest and the degree of urethral incompetence.
Schick E; Bertrand PE; Jolivet-Tremblay M; Dupont C; Tessier J
Neurourol Urodyn; 2004; 23(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 14694451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Urodynamic prolapse reduction alters urethral pressure but not filling or pressure flow parameters.
Mueller ER; Kenton K; Mahajan S; FitzGerald MP; Brubaker L
J Urol; 2007 Feb; 177(2):600-3. PubMed ID: 17222641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Urethral closure pressure changes with age in men.
Hammerer P; Michl U; Meyer-Moldenhauer WH; Huland H
J Urol; 1996 Nov; 156(5):1741-3. PubMed ID: 8863584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measurement of urethral closure function in women with stress urinary incontinence.
Klarskov N; Scholfield D; Soma K; Darekar A; Mills I; Lose G
J Urol; 2009 Jun; 181(6):2628-33; discussion 2633. PubMed ID: 19375093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of microtransducer and fiberoptic catheters for urodynamic studies.
Culligan PJ; Goldberg RP; Blackhurst DW; Sasso K; Koduri S; Sand PK
Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Aug; 98(2):253-7. PubMed ID: 11506841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
