These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
442 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18639404)
1. Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. Loubele M; Bogaerts R; Van Dijck E; Pauwels R; Vanheusden S; Suetens P; Marchal G; Sanderink G; Jacobs R Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):461-8. PubMed ID: 18639404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparative dosimetry of dental cone-beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography for oral and maxillofacial radiology]. Qu XM; Li G; Zhang ZY; Ma XC Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 46(10):595-9. PubMed ID: 22321628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners. Suomalainen A; Kiljunen T; Käser Y; Peltola J; Kortesniemi M Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):367-78. PubMed ID: 19700530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cone beam computed tomography and low-dose multislice computed tomography in orthodontics and dentistry: a comparative evaluation on image quality and radiation exposure. Hofmann E; Schmid M; Lell M; Hirschfelder U J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Sep; 75(5):384-98. PubMed ID: 25158951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography. Schulze D; Heiland M; Thurmann H; Adam G Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 15313998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Dosimetry of cone-beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography scanning for temporal bone]. Xie XY; Zhang ZY; Wang Z; Yin GX; Jia SM Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jun; 98(23):1837-1840. PubMed ID: 29925165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT) Part I. On subjective image quality. Liang X; Jacobs R; Hassan B; Li L; Pauwels R; Corpas L; Souza PC; Martens W; Shahbazian M; Alonso A; Lambrichts I Eur J Radiol; 2010 Aug; 75(2):265-9. PubMed ID: 19410409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view. Hirsch E; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Silva MA Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 18606748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dose and image quality of cone-beam computed tomography as compared with conventional multislice computed tomography in abdominal imaging. Schegerer AA; Lechel U; Ritter M; Weisser G; Fink C; Brix G Invest Radiol; 2014 Oct; 49(10):675-84. PubMed ID: 24853071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative dosimetry of radiography device, MSCT device and two CBCT devices in the elbow region. Koivisto J; van Eijnatten M; Ludlow J; Kiljunen T; Shi XQ; Wolff J J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 May; 22(5):128-138. PubMed ID: 33811787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Cross-sectional imaging in dentomaxillofacial diagnostics: dose comparison of dental MSCT and NewTom 9000 DVT]. Coppenrath E; Draenert F; Lechel U; Veit R; Meindl T; Reiser M; Mueller-Lisse U Rofo; 2008 May; 180(5):396-401. PubMed ID: 18543414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry. Roberts JA; Drage NA; Davies J; Thomas DW Br J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 82(973):35-40. PubMed ID: 18852212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of bone segmentation quality of cone-beam CT versus multislice spiral CT: a pilot study. Loubele M; Maes F; Schutyser F; Marchal G; Jacobs R; Suetens P Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Aug; 102(2):225-34. PubMed ID: 16876067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation. Silva MA; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Bumann A; Visser H; Hirsch E Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):640.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18456133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of the effective dose in supine, prone, and oblique positions in the maxillofacial region using a novel combined extremity and maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography scanner. Koivisto J; Wolff J; Järnstedt J; Dastidar P; Kortesniemi M Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2014 Sep; 118(3):355-62. PubMed ID: 25151590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Head and neck effective dose and quantitative assessment of image quality: a study to compare cone beam CT and multislice spiral CT. Nardi C; Talamonti C; Pallotta S; Saletti P; Calistri L; Cordopatri C; Colagrande S Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Oct; 46(7):20170030. PubMed ID: 28511564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography. Chau AC; Fung K Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Apr; 107(4):559-65. PubMed ID: 19168378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; Brooks SL; Howerton WB Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):219-26. PubMed ID: 16798915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]