BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18639431)

  • 1. Eleven years of experience with metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing: a review of 1000 conserve plus.
    Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Sep; 23(6 Suppl 1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18639431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Resurfacing THA for patients younger than 50 year: results of 2- to 9-year followup.
    Amstutz HC; Ball ST; Le Duff MJ; Dorey FJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Jul; 460():159-64. PubMed ID: 17310929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of technique changes on aseptic loosening of the femoral component in hip resurfacing. Results of 600 Conserve Plus with a 3 to 9 year follow-up.
    Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ; Campbell PA; Dorey FJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Jun; 22(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17562402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical experience of Ganz surgical dislocation approach for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.
    Beaulé PE; Shim P; Banga K
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6 Suppl):127-31. PubMed ID: 19553070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Failure mechanisms of total hip resurfacing: implications for the present.
    Ritter MA; Lutgring JD; Berend ME; Pierson JL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Dec; 453():110-4. PubMed ID: 17006372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. THARIES resurfacing arthroplasty. Evolution and long-term results.
    Amstutz HC; Dorey F; O'Carroll PF
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1986 Dec; (213):92-114. PubMed ID: 3536252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Present state of metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing.
    Amstutz HC
    J Surg Orthop Adv; 2008; 17(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 18284899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of patient selection and surgical technique on the results of Conserve® Plus hip resurfacing--3.5- to 14-year follow-up.
    Amstutz HC; Takamura KM; Le Duff MJ
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2011 Apr; 42(2):133-42, vii. PubMed ID: 21435489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Long-term experience with the combined ARBOND hydroxyapatite coating in implant osteointegration].
    Landor I; Vavrík P; Jahoda D; Pokorný D; Ballay R; Sosna A
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Jun; 76(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 19595277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Five-year results of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty in Asian patients.
    Nishii T; Sugano N; Miki H; Takao M; Koyama T; Yoshikawa H
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Feb; 22(2):176-83. PubMed ID: 17275630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a flattened press-fit acetabular component in osteoarthritis and inflammatory arthritis: a prospective study on 416 hips with 6-10 years follow-up.
    Zwartelé RE; Olsthoorn PG; Pöll RG; Brand R; Doets HC
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Dec; 128(12):1379-86. PubMed ID: 18758793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of the size of the component on the outcome of resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a review of the literature.
    Shimmin AJ; Walter WL; Esposito C
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Apr; 92(4):469-76. PubMed ID: 20357319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcomes after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: could we achieve better function?
    Newman MA; Barker KL; Pandit H; Murray DW
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Apr; 89(4):660-6. PubMed ID: 18373996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing for obese patients.
    Le Duff MJ; Amstutz HC; Dorey FJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Dec; 89(12):2705-11. PubMed ID: 18056503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The early results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing - a prospective study at a minimum two-year follow-up.
    Bergeron SG; Desy NM; Nikolaou VS; Debiparshad K; Antoniou J
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):132-4. PubMed ID: 19583540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Less range of motion with resurfacing arthroplasty than with total hip arthroplasty: in vitro examination of 8 designs.
    Bengs BC; Sangiorgio SN; Ebramzadeh E
    Acta Orthop; 2008 Dec; 79(6):755-62. PubMed ID: 19085491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Causes of early failure in a multicenter clinical trial of hip resurfacing.
    Kim PR; Beaulé PE; Laflamme GY; Dunbar M
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Sep; 23(6 Suppl 1):44-9. PubMed ID: 18722302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hip resurfacing for osteonecrosis: two- to 18-year results of the Conserve Plus design and technique.
    Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ
    Bone Joint J; 2016 Jul; 98-B(7):901-9. PubMed ID: 27365467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cementless porous-coated anatomic total hip arthroplasty at Duke: 18- to 24-year follow-up.
    Ferrell MS; Browne JA; Attarian DE; Cook C; Bolognesi MP
    J Surg Orthop Adv; 2009; 18(3):150-4. PubMed ID: 19843441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Femoral neck fractures after metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing: a prospective cohort study.
    Marker DR; Seyler TM; Jinnah RH; Delanois RE; Ulrich SD; Mont MA
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Oct; 22(7 Suppl 3):66-71. PubMed ID: 17919597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.