These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1863965)

  • 1. Evaluation of the densitometric method of ejection fraction by direct digital subtraction left ventriculography.
    Shiba K; Nanki M; Hori H; Sakamoto N
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1991 May; 23(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 1863965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Videodensitometric assessment of right and left ventricular functions by digital subtraction angiography].
    Ikeda H; Yoshiga O; Shibao K; Hidaka Y; Okabe K; Yoh M; Hiyamuta K; Sugi K; Ohkita Y; Koga Y
    J Cardiol; 1987 Sep; 17(3):587-95. PubMed ID: 3331162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Videodensitometric ejection fractions from intravenous digital subtraction left ventriculograms: correlation with conventional direct contrast and radionuclide ventriculography.
    Detrano R; MacIntyre WJ; Salcedo EE; O'Donnell J; Underwood DA; Simpfendorfer C; Go RT; Jones H; Butters K; Leatherman J
    Radiology; 1985 Apr; 155(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 3883414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Densitometric regional ejection fraction: a new three-dimensional index of regional left ventricular function--comparison with geometric methods.
    Chappuis FP; Widmann TF; Nicod P; Peterson KL
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1988 Jan; 11(1):72-82. PubMed ID: 3275707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improved densitometric measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction using dual-energy digital subtraction angiography.
    van Lysel MS; Miller WP; Fuerst TP; Albright DJ
    Int J Card Imaging; 1994 Jun; 10(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 7963749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Digital subtraction angiocardiography: reliability of densitometric determination of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction].
    Machnig T; Lehmkuhl H; Reynen K; Engels G; Eicker B; Barth K; Bachmann K
    Z Kardiol; 1993 Jul; 82(7):443-8. PubMed ID: 8379245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction by videodensitometric analysis of digital subtraction angiograms.
    Tobis J; Nalcioglu O; Seibert A; Johnston WD; Henry WL
    Am J Cardiol; 1983 Oct; 52(7):871-5. PubMed ID: 6353899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Videodensitometric ejection fraction from intravenous digital subtraction right ventriculograms: correlation with first pass radionuclide ejection fraction.
    Detrano R; MacIntyre W; Salcedo EE; O'Donnell J; Underwood DA; Simpfendorfer C; Go RT; Butters K; Withrow S
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Jun; 5(6):1377-81. PubMed ID: 3889098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative assessment of regional left ventricular function by densitometric analysis of digital-subtraction ventriculograms: correlation with myocardial systolic shortening in dogs.
    Chappuis F; Widmann T; Guth B; Nicod P; Peterson KL
    Circulation; 1988 Feb; 77(2):457-67. PubMed ID: 3276410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Evaluation of left ventricular function by digital subtraction angiography: effect of dose and administration mode of contrast medium, and comparison with direct ventriculography].
    Kuribayashi S; Ootaki M; Matsuyama S; Kanemoto N; Furuya H
    J Cardiogr; 1985 Sep; 15(3):575-84. PubMed ID: 3915507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of the angiographic accuracy of digital left ventriculography.
    Nichols AB; Martin EC; Fles TP; Stugensky KM; Balancio LA; Casarella WJ; Weiss MB
    Am J Cardiol; 1983 Jan; 51(1):224-30. PubMed ID: 6849261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determination of left ventricular ejection fraction by computer densitometric analysis of digital subtraction angiography: experimental validation and correlation with area-length methods.
    Nissen SE; Elion JL; Grayburn P; Booth DC; Wisenbaugh TW; DeMaria AN
    Am J Cardiol; 1987 Mar; 59(6):675-80. PubMed ID: 3548302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On-line evaluation of systolic performance by densitometry in digital left ventriculography.
    Lehmkuhl H; Altstidl R; Machnig T; Blunck B; Barth K; Bachmann K
    Clin Cardiol; 1996 Sep; 19(9):729-36. PubMed ID: 8874993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of intravenous digital subtraction ventriculography in the evaluation of left ventricle volumes and ejection fraction.
    Perondi R; Gregorini L; Pomidossi G; Saino A; Alessio P; Zanchetti A; Mancia G
    Eur Heart J; 1991 Mar; 12(3):363-7. PubMed ID: 2040319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of digital intravenous ventriculography with direct left ventriculography for quantitation of left ventricular volumes and ejection fractions.
    Norris SL; Slutsky RA; Mancini J; Ashburn WL; Gregoratos G; Peterson KL; Higgins CB
    Am J Cardiol; 1983 May; 51(8):1399-403. PubMed ID: 6846167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Digital subtraction ventriculography in determining global and regional left ventricular parameters compared to left catheterization cardiography].
    Eichstädt H; Langer M; Felix R
    Radiologe; 1984 Jun; 24(6):277-85. PubMed ID: 6382430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Densitometric assessment of regional left ventricular systolic function during graded ischemia in the dog by use of dual-energy digital subtraction ventriculography.
    McCollough CH; Miller WP; Van Lysel MS; Folts JD; Peppler WW; Albright DJ
    Am Heart J; 1993 Jun; 125(6):1667-75. PubMed ID: 8498309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of digital and radionuclide left ventriculography in patients at risk from conventional left ventriculography.
    Lemarbre L; Paquet E; Bourassa MG; Lespérance J; Dupras G; Laurier J
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1984 Dec; 35(4):349-53. PubMed ID: 6396304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of single plane videodensitometry-based right ventricular ejection fraction in right and left anterior oblique views to biplane geometry-based right ventricular ejection fraction.
    Cohen M; Monsen C; Francis X; Sherman W; Ambrose JA; Teichholz LE; Fuster V
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1987 Jul; 10(1):150-5. PubMed ID: 3298359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of intravenous digital subtraction cineangiocardiography with conventional contrast ventriculography for the determination of the left ventricular volume at rest and during exercise.
    Birchler B; Hess OM; Murakami T; Niederer P; Anliker M; Krayenbuehl HP
    Eur Heart J; 1985 Jun; 6(6):497-509. PubMed ID: 3899652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.