506 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18640290)
1. Multiple pathways cooperate to facilitate DNA replication fork progression through alkylated DNA.
Vázquez MV; Rojas V; Tercero JA
DNA Repair (Amst); 2008 Oct; 7(10):1693-704. PubMed ID: 18640290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Methods to study replication fork collapse in budding yeast.
Liberi G; Cotta-Ramusino C; Lopes M; Sogo J; Conti C; Bensimon A; Foiani M
Methods Enzymol; 2006; 409():442-62. PubMed ID: 16793417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maintenance of fork integrity at damaged DNA and natural pause sites.
Tourrière H; Pasero P
DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jul; 6(7):900-13. PubMed ID: 17379579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Temporal separation of replication and recombination requires the intra-S checkpoint.
Meister P; Taddei A; Vernis L; Poidevin M; Gasser SM; Baldacci G
J Cell Biol; 2005 Feb; 168(4):537-44. PubMed ID: 15716375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Checkpoint responses to replication fork barriers.
Lambert S; Carr AM
Biochimie; 2005 Jul; 87(7):591-602. PubMed ID: 15989976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The novel gene mus7(+) is involved in the repair of replication-associated DNA damage in fission yeast.
Yokoyama M; Inoue H; Ishii C; Murakami Y
DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jun; 6(6):770-80. PubMed ID: 17307401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Different requirements for the association of ATR-ATRIP and 9-1-1 to the stalled replication forks.
Kanoh Y; Tamai K; Shirahige K
Gene; 2006 Aug; 377():88-95. PubMed ID: 16753272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The DNA damage response during DNA replication.
Branzei D; Foiani M
Curr Opin Cell Biol; 2005 Dec; 17(6):568-75. PubMed ID: 16226452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex.
Katou Y; Kanoh Y; Bando M; Noguchi H; Tanaka H; Ashikari T; Sugimoto K; Shirahige K
Nature; 2003 Aug; 424(6952):1078-83. PubMed ID: 12944972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Exploring the roles of Mus81-Eme1/Mms4 at perturbed replication forks.
Osman F; Whitby MC
DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jul; 6(7):1004-17. PubMed ID: 17409028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint.
Tercero JA; Diffley JF
Nature; 2001 Aug; 412(6846):553-7. PubMed ID: 11484057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Checking that replication breakdown is not terminal.
Carr AM
Science; 2002 Jul; 297(5581):557-8. PubMed ID: 12142525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Caffeine delays replication fork progression and enhances UV-induced homologous recombination in Chinese hamster cell lines.
Johansson F; Lagerqvist A; Filippi S; Palitti F; Erixon K; Helleday T; Jenssen D
DNA Repair (Amst); 2006 Dec; 5(12):1449-58. PubMed ID: 16968677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. DNA polymerase stabilization at stalled replication forks requires Mec1 and the RecQ helicase Sgs1.
Cobb JA; Bjergbaek L; Shimada K; Frei C; Gasser SM
EMBO J; 2003 Aug; 22(16):4325-36. PubMed ID: 12912929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The budding yeast protein Chl1p is required to preserve genome integrity upon DNA damage in S-phase.
Laha S; Das SP; Hajra S; Sau S; Sinha P
Nucleic Acids Res; 2006; 34(20):5880-91. PubMed ID: 17062629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Limiting amounts of budding yeast Rad53 S-phase checkpoint activity results in increased resistance to DNA alkylation damage.
Cordón-Preciado V; Ufano S; Bueno A
Nucleic Acids Res; 2006; 34(20):5852-62. PubMed ID: 17062626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. DNA damage responses and their many interactions with the replication fork.
Andreassen PR; Ho GP; D'Andrea AD
Carcinogenesis; 2006 May; 27(5):883-92. PubMed ID: 16490739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The analysis of S. cerevisiae cells deleted for mitotic cyclin Clb2 reveals a novel requirement of Sgs1 DNA helicase and Exonuclease 1 when replication forks break in the presence of alkylation damage.
Signon L; Simon MN
Mutat Res; 2014 Nov; 769():80-92. PubMed ID: 25771727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pol32 is required for Pol zeta-dependent translesion synthesis and prevents double-strand breaks at the replication fork.
Hanna M; Ball LG; Tong AH; Boone C; Xiao W
Mutat Res; 2007 Dec; 625(1-2):164-76. PubMed ID: 17681555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. DNA replication meets genetic exchange: chromosomal damage and its repair by homologous recombination.
Kuzminov A
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2001 Jul; 98(15):8461-8. PubMed ID: 11459990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
