183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18640439)
1. Giving consent in dementia research.
Warner J; Nomani E
Lancet; 2008 Jul; 372(9634):183-5. PubMed ID: 18640439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Implications of consent for medical practice.
Nicholas S; Stephens R
Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2017 Jun; 78(6):C92-C95. PubMed ID: 28614032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Advance consent for dementia research.
Sachs GA
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord; 1994; 8(Suppl. 4):19-27. PubMed ID: 11657670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Beyond competence: advance directives in dementia research.
Jongsma KR; van de Vathorst S
Monash Bioeth Rev; 2015; 33(2-3):167-80. PubMed ID: 26458366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Advance decisions to refuse treatment.
Griffith R
Br J Nurs; 2019 May; 28(9):592-593. PubMed ID: 31070974
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Consent and the code.
Lessing-Turner G
Pract Midwife; 2002 Dec; 5(11):36-7. PubMed ID: 12520818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Mental Capacity Act 2005--implications for anaesthesia and critical care.
White SM; Baldwin TJ
Anaesthesia; 2006 Apr; 61(4):381-9. PubMed ID: 16548960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mental capacity and medical decisions.
Eccles JT
Age Ageing; 2001 Jan; 30(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 11322673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Surrogate consent for dementia research: a national survey of older Americans.
Kim SY; Kim HM; Langa KM; Karlawish JH; Knopman DS; Appelbaum PS
Neurology; 2009 Jan; 72(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 19139366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A therapeutic jurisprudence perspective on participation in research by subjects with reduced capacity to consent: a comment on Kim and Appelbaum.
Winick BJ; Goodman KW
Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(4):485-94. PubMed ID: 16883619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Advance directives, current legal and ethical issues.
Brooks G
Nurs Crit Care; 1997; 2(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 9873298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Ethic and legal aspects of informed consent in medical practice and research].
Mendoza-Romo MA; Nava-Zárate N; Escalante-Pulido JM
Gac Med Mex; 2003; 139(2):184-7. PubMed ID: 12754957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The European Clinical Trials Directive revisited: the VISEAR recommendations.
Liddell K; Chamberlain D; Menon DK; Bion J; Kompanje EJ; Lemaire F; Druml C; Vrhovac B; Wiedermann CJ; Sterz F
Resuscitation; 2006 Apr; 69(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 16515833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Advance directives, future selves and decision-making.
Maclean AR
Med Law Rev; 2006; 14(3):291-320. PubMed ID: 16901976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The proposed 'Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act'.
Pickhaver A
Contemp Nurse; 1993 Aug; 2(2):55. PubMed ID: 8260768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Consent to clinical decisions when capacity is absent. Part 1: Making decisions.
Nazarko L
Nurs Manag (Harrow); 2004 Mar; 10(10):18-22. PubMed ID: 15038301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The forum. Respecting and protecting mentally impaired persons in medical research.
Fisher CB
Ethics Behav; 2002; 12(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 12656072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Informed consent for schizophrenia research: what is an investigator (or IRB) to do?
Palmer BW
Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(4):447-52. PubMed ID: 16883620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Taking resuscitation decisions in the nursing home setting.
Makin A
Nurs Times; 2005 Oct 11-17; 101(41):28-30. PubMed ID: 16255103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The forum. Competence to consent to research: where psychology, ethics, and the law intersect.
Rosenfeld B
Ethics Behav; 2002; 12(3):284-7. PubMed ID: 12656073
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
