256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18640443)
1. Protocol review at The Lancet.
McNamee D; James A; Kleinert S
Lancet; 2008 Jul; 372(9634):189-90. PubMed ID: 18640443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Selective reporting in clinical trials: analysis of trial protocols accepted by The Lancet.
Al-Marzouki S; Roberts I; Evans S; Marshall T
Lancet; 2008 Jul; 372(9634):201. PubMed ID: 18640445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. How Should Journals Handle the Conflict of Interest of Their Editors?: Who Watches the "Watchers"?
Gottlieb JD; Bressler NM
JAMA; 2017 May; 317(17):1757-1758. PubMed ID: 28464152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. All the lonely people: by Caveman.
J Cell Sci; 2004 Aug; 117(Pt 17):3705-6. PubMed ID: 15286170
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [How strict should editors be? Nothing is done for the sake of errors].
Eklund J
Lakartidningen; 2004 Dec; 101(51-52):4250. PubMed ID: 15658596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of trial registration on reporting quality of randomized trials: study from highest ranked journals.
Reveiz L; Cortés-Jofré M; Asenjo Lobos C; Nicita G; Ciapponi A; Garcìa-Dieguez M; Tellez D; Delgado M; Solà I; Ospina E;
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Nov; 63(11):1216-22. PubMed ID: 20430576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Peer review and appeal: flawed but trusted?
Pravinkumar E
Lancet; 2003 Aug; 362(9385):747. PubMed ID: 12957106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Protecting Against "Publication Spin" in Clinical Trials.
Jette AM; Costa LOP
Phys Ther; 2019 Sep; 99(9):1119-1121. PubMed ID: 31505672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A withdrawn prepublication.
Dean PB
Lancet; 2007 Mar; 369(9565):901. PubMed ID: 17368138
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Matthew Effect.
Heinemann MK
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Mar; 64(2):87. PubMed ID: 26961059
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Registration of clinical trials--results included now!].
Schroeder TV
Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Apr; 170(18):1535. PubMed ID: 18454920
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Freedom of expression and editorial independence: Four firings and a Kafkanian process].
Gøtzsche PC
Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Apr; 170(18):1537-8. PubMed ID: 18454921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Guest Editorial: Background and Rationale for Clinical Trial Registration.
Abrams HB; Chisolm TH; Sanchez VA; Arnold ML; Galster JA
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):191-196. PubMed ID: 29369287
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The importance of no evidence.
Nat Hum Behav; 2019 Mar; 3(3):197. PubMed ID: 30953022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Registered Reports in the
Abt G; Boreham C; Davison G; Jackson R; Wallace E; Williams AM
J Sports Sci; 2021 Aug; 39(16):1789-1790. PubMed ID: 34379576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Suggesting reviewers.
Carmichael SW; Agur AM; Seifert MF; Spinner RJ; Tubbs RS; McDonald S; Nicholson H; Lachman N
Clin Anat; 2006 Jan; 19(1):1. PubMed ID: 16342266
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Toward Fairness in Data Sharing.
; Devereaux PJ; Guyatt G; Gerstein H; Connolly S; Yusuf S
N Engl J Med; 2016 Aug; 375(5):405-7. PubMed ID: 27518658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The challenge of publishing clinically meaningful evidence.
Kösters M; Becker T
Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2015 Dec; 132(6):418-9. PubMed ID: 26390860
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Lessons learned from the coxibs' ups and downs. The journals must be tougher against referees and authors].
Milerad J
Lakartidningen; 2008 May 21-27; 105(21):1560-1. PubMed ID: 18574991
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. On publication of a manuscript: the author, the reviewer and the editor.
Tonkin M
Hand Surg; 2013; 18(3):ix-x. PubMed ID: 24156598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
