These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1864058)

  • 21. Does a tensioning device pinned to the tibia improve knee anterior-posterior load-displacement compared to manual tensioning of the graft following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A cadaveric study of two tibial fixation devices.
    Thompson DM; Hull ML; Howell SM
    J Orthop Res; 2006 Sep; 24(9):1832-41. PubMed ID: 16865723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mechanical bone strength of the tibial resection surface at increasing distance from the joint line in total knee arthroplasty.
    Chaput CD; Weeden SH; Hyman WA; Hitt KD
    J Surg Orthop Adv; 2004; 13(4):195-8. PubMed ID: 15691179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of high tibial flexion osteotomy on cartilage pressure and joint kinematics: a biomechanical study in human cadaveric knees. Winner of the AGA-DonJoy Award 2004.
    Agneskirchner JD; Hurschler C; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Imhoff AB; Lobenhoffer P
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2004 Nov; 124(9):575-84. PubMed ID: 15480717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Uncemented knee prosthesis. Results apropos of 58 cases with a minimum of 5-year follow-up].
    Gacon G; Coillard JY; Barba L; Travers V
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1995; 81(6):505-13. PubMed ID: 8560021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predicting the effect of tray malalignment on risk for bone damage and implant subsidence after total knee arthroplasty.
    Wong J; Steklov N; Patil S; Flores-Hernandez C; Kester M; Colwell CW; D'Lima DD
    J Orthop Res; 2011 Mar; 29(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 20882595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The mechanical stability of various noncemented tibial components.
    Volz RG; Nisbet JK; Lee RW; McMurtry MG
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Jan; (226):38-42. PubMed ID: 3335105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In vitro study of inter-individual variation in posterior slope in the knee joint.
    de Boer JJ; Blankevoort L; Kingma I; Vorster W
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Jul; 24(6):488-92. PubMed ID: 19368994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Open screw fixation versus arthroscopic suture fixation of tibial posterior cruciate ligament avulsion injuries: a mechanical comparison.
    Sasaki SU; da Mota e Albuquerque RF; Amatuzzi MM; Pereira CA
    Arthroscopy; 2007 Nov; 23(11):1226-30. PubMed ID: 17986411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of posterior cut angle on tibial component loading.
    Bai B; Baez J; Testa N; Kummer FJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Oct; 15(7):916-20. PubMed ID: 11061453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty (OtisKnee) results in malalignment.
    Klatt BA; Goyal N; Austin MS; Hozack WJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Jan; 23(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 18165024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Bone morphing system for rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty].
    Wu H; van Driessche S; Goutallier D
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jan; 22(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 18361228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of screws and a sleeve on initial fixation in uncemented total knee tibial components.
    Miura H; Whiteside LA; Easley JC; Amador DD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 Oct; (259):160-8. PubMed ID: 2208851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cementless reconstruction of massive tibial bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty.
    Whiteside LA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Nov; (248):80-6. PubMed ID: 2805500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Survivorship of cemented total knee arthroplasty.
    Font-Rodriguez DE; Scuderi GR; Insall JN
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Dec; (345):79-86. PubMed ID: 9418624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Technical considerations in total knee arthroplasty.
    Dorr LD; Boiardo RA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1986 Apr; (205):5-11. PubMed ID: 3516503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Implant migration and failure in total knee arthroplasty is related to body mass index and tibial component size.
    Berend ME; Ritter MA; Hyldahl HC; Meding JB; Redelman R
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Sep; 23(6 Suppl 1):104-9. PubMed ID: 18722310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Two-part total knee arthroplasty: evolution and present status.
    Coventry MB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1979; (145):29-36. PubMed ID: 535285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Tibial component coverage based on bone mineral density of the cut tibial surface during unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: clinical relevance of the prevention of tibial component subsidence.
    Lee YS; Yun JY; Lee BK
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2014 Jan; 134(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 24276362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Radiologic study of the accuracy of a tibial intramedullary cutting guide for knee arthroplasty.
    Evans PD; Marshall PD; McDonnell B; Richards J; Evans EJ
    J Arthroplasty; 1995 Feb; 10(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 7730829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Radiologic analysis of the tibial intramedullary canal in Chinese varus knees: implications in total knee arthroplasty.
    Ko PS; Tio MK; Ban CM; Mak YK; Ip FK; Lam JJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2001 Feb; 16(2):212-5. PubMed ID: 11222896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.