These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
741 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18640876)
1. Preliminary biomechanical evaluation of prophylactic vertebral reinforcement adjacent to vertebroplasty under cyclic loading. Oakland RJ; Furtado NR; Wilcox RK; Timothy J; Hall RM Spine J; 2009 Feb; 9(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 18640876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The biomechanical effectiveness of prophylactic vertebroplasty: a dynamic cadaveric study. Oakland RJ; Furtado NR; Wilcox RK; Timothy J; Hall RM J Neurosurg Spine; 2008 May; 8(5):442-9. PubMed ID: 18447690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evolution of bone mineral density after percutaneous kyphoplasty in fresh osteoporotic vertebral body fractures and adjacent vertebrae along with sagittal spine alignment. Korovessis P; Zacharatos S; Repantis T; Michael A; Karachalios D J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun; 21(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 18525491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adjacent vertebral body fracture following vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate or calcium phosphate cement: biomechanical evaluation of the cadaveric spine. Nouda S; Tomita S; Kin A; Kawahara K; Kinoshita M Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(24):2613-8. PubMed ID: 19910764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vertebroplasty: only small cement volumes are required to normalize stress distributions on the vertebral bodies. Luo J; Daines L; Charalambous A; Adams MA; Annesley-Williams DJ; Dolan P Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(26):2865-73. PubMed ID: 20010394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prophylactic vertebroplasty may reduce the risk of adjacent intact vertebra from fatigue injury: an ex vivo biomechanical study. Chiang CK; Wang YH; Yang CY; Yang BD; Wang JL Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb; 34(4):356-64. PubMed ID: 19214094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Vertebroplasty in the treatment of back pain. Muto M; Muto E; Izzo R; Diano AA; Lavanga A; Di Furia U Radiol Med; 2005 Mar; 109(3):208-19. PubMed ID: 15775889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical performance of the new BeadEx implant in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: restoration and maintenance of height and stability. Kettler A; Schmoelz W; Shezifi Y; Ohana N; Ben-Arye A; Claes L; Wilke HJ Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Aug; 21(7):676-82. PubMed ID: 16567025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical evaluation of kyphoplasty with calcium sulfate cement in a cadaveric osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model. Perry A; Mahar A; Massie J; Arrieta N; Garfin S; Kim C Spine J; 2005; 5(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 16153574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A biomechanical investigation of vertebroplasty in osteoporotic compression fractures and in prophylactic vertebral reinforcement. Furtado N; Oakland RJ; Wilcox RK; Hall RM Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(17):E480-7. PubMed ID: 17762281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical changes after the augmentation of experimental osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in the cadaveric thoracic spine. Kayanja MM; Togawa D; Lieberman IH Spine J; 2005; 5(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 15653085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A biomechanical analysis of intravertebral pressures during vertebroplasty of cadaveric spines with and without simulated metastases. Reidy D; Ahn H; Mousavi P; Finkelstein J; Whyne CM Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(14):1534-9. PubMed ID: 12865840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prophylactic vertebroplasty: cement injection into non-fractured vertebral bodies during percutaneous vertebroplasty. Kobayashi N; Numaguchi Y; Fuwa S; Uemura A; Matsusako M; Okajima Y; Ishiyama M; Takahashi O Acad Radiol; 2009 Feb; 16(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 19124098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spinal loads after osteoporotic vertebral fractures treated by vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. Rohlmann A; Zander T; Bergmann G Eur Spine J; 2006 Aug; 15(8):1255-64. PubMed ID: 16311752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prophylactic vertebroplasty can decrease the fracture risk of adjacent vertebrae: an in vitro cadaveric study. Aquarius R; Homminga J; Hosman AJ; Verdonschot N; Tanck E Med Eng Phys; 2014 Jul; 36(7):944-8. PubMed ID: 24736018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Premature adjacent vertebral fracture after vertebroplasty: a biomechanical study. Fahim DK; Sun K; Tawackoli W; Mendel E; Rhines LD; Burton AW; Kim DH; Ehni BL; Liebschner MA Neurosurgery; 2011 Sep; 69(3):733-44. PubMed ID: 21499145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of bone density on vertebral strength and stiffness after percutaneous vertebroplasty. Graham J; Ahn C; Hai N; Buch BD Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(18):E505-11. PubMed ID: 17700430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanism of fractures of adjacent and augmented vertebrae following simulated vertebroplasty. Wang JL; Chiang CK; Kuo YW; Chou WK; Yang BD J Biomech; 2012 May; 45(8):1372-8. PubMed ID: 22444349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The biomechanical effects of osteoporosis vertebral augmentation with cancellous bone granules or bone cement on treated and adjacent non-treated vertebral bodies: a finite element evaluation. Zhang L; Yang G; Wu L; Yu B Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2010 Feb; 25(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 19917516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]