201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18641251)
1. Lossy 3D JPEG2000 compression of abdominal CT images in patients with acute abdominal complaints: effect of compression ratio on diagnostic confidence and accuracy.
Ringl H; Schernthaner R; Sala E; El-Rabadi K; Weber M; Schima W; Herold CJ; Dixon AK
Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):476-84. PubMed ID: 18641251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lossy three-dimensional JPEG2000 compression of abdominal CT images: assessment of the visually lossless threshold and effect of compression ratio on image quality.
Ringl H; Schernthaner RE; Kulinna-Cosentini C; Weber M; Schaefer-Prokop C; Herold CJ; Schima W
Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):467-74. PubMed ID: 17890355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. JPEG2000 3D compression vs. 2D compression: an assessment of artifact amount and computing time in compressing thin-section abdomen CT images.
Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Richter T; Kang HS; Kim SY; Kim YH; Seo J
Med Phys; 2009 Mar; 36(3):835-44. PubMed ID: 19378744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advantage in image fidelity and additional computing time of JPEG2000 3D in comparison to JPEG2000 in compressing abdomen CT image datasets of different section thicknesses.
Lee H; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Park S; Seo J; Shin YG; Kim B
Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4238-48. PubMed ID: 20879584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of perceptible artifacts in JPEG2000 compressed abdomen CT images using a perceptual image quality metric.
Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Mantiuk R; Bajpai V; Kim TJ; Kim YH; Yoon CJ; Hahn S
Acad Radiol; 2008 Mar; 15(3):314-25. PubMed ID: 18280929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting the fidelity of JPEG2000 compressed CT images using DICOM header information.
Kim KJ; Kim B; Lee H; Choi H; Jeon JJ; Ahn JH; Lee KH
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6449-57. PubMed ID: 22149828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of image features in predicting visually lossless thresholds of JPEG2000 compressed body CT images: initial trial.
Kim KJ; Kim B; Lee KH; Mantiuk R; Richter T; Kang HS
Radiology; 2013 Sep; 268(3):710-8. PubMed ID: 23630311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. JPEG2000 2D and 3D reversible compressions of thin-section chest CT images: improving compressibility by increasing data redundancy outside the body region.
Kim KJ; Lee KH; Kim B; Richter T; Yun ID; Lee SU; Bae KT; Shim H
Radiology; 2011 Apr; 259(1):271-7. PubMed ID: 21325033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. JPEG2000 compression of thin-section CT images of the lung: effect of compression ratio on image quality.
Ringl H; Schernthaner RE; Bankier AA; Weber M; Prokop M; Herold CJ; Schaefer-Prokop C
Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):869-77. PubMed ID: 16868278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Artifacts in slab average-intensity-projection images reformatted from JPEG 2000 compressed thin-section abdominal CT data sets.
Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Mantiuk R; Kim HR; Kim YH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jun; 190(6):W342-50. PubMed ID: 18492876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of perceptible artifacts in JPEG 2000-compressed chest CT images using mathematical and perceptual quality metrics.
Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Mantiuk R; Hahn S; Kim TJ; Kim YH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):328-34. PubMed ID: 18212217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of JPEG2000 compression on detection of skull fractures.
McEntee MF; Nikolovski I; Bourne R; Pietrzyk MW; Evanoff MG; Brennan PC; Tay KL
Acad Radiol; 2013 Jun; 20(6):712-20. PubMed ID: 23664399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. JPEG 2000 compression of abdominal CT: difference in tolerance between thin- and thick-section images.
Woo HS; Kim KJ; Kim TJ; Hahn S; Kim B; Kim YH; Lee KH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):535-41. PubMed ID: 17715097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of three image fidelity metrics of different computational principles for JPEG2000 compressed abdomen CT images.
Kim KJ; Kim B; Mantiuk R; Richter T; Lee H; Kang HS; Seo J; Lee KH
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Aug; 29(8):1496-503. PubMed ID: 20529734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
Singh S; Kalra MK; Hsieh J; Licato PE; Do S; Pien HH; Blake MA
Radiology; 2010 Nov; 257(2):373-83. PubMed ID: 20829535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Free-response receiver operating characteristic evaluation of lossy JPEG2000 and object-based set partitioning in hierarchical trees compression of digitized mammograms.
Penedo M; Souto M; Tahoces PG; Carreira JM; Villalón J; Porto G; Seoane C; Vidal JJ; Berbaum KS; Chakraborty DP; Fajardo LL
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):450-7. PubMed ID: 16244253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiation dose reduction with hybrid iterative reconstruction for pediatric CT.
Singh S; Kalra MK; Shenoy-Bhangle AS; Saini A; Gervais DA; Westra SJ; Thrall JH
Radiology; 2012 May; 263(2):537-46. PubMed ID: 22517962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study.
Deák Z; Grimm JM; Treitl M; Geyer LL; Linsenmaier U; Körner M; Reiser MF; Wirth S
Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):197-206. PubMed ID: 23169793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique.
Prakash P; Kalra MK; Kambadakone AK; Pien H; Hsieh J; Blake MA; Sahani DV
Invest Radiol; 2010 Apr; 45(4):202-10. PubMed ID: 20177389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiation dose reduction with Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction technique for abdominal computed tomography.
Kalra MK; Woisetschläger M; Dahlström N; Singh S; Lindblom M; Choy G; Quick P; Schmidt B; Sedlmair M; Blake MA; Persson A
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 22592621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
