These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18641251)

  • 1. Lossy 3D JPEG2000 compression of abdominal CT images in patients with acute abdominal complaints: effect of compression ratio on diagnostic confidence and accuracy.
    Ringl H; Schernthaner R; Sala E; El-Rabadi K; Weber M; Schima W; Herold CJ; Dixon AK
    Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):476-84. PubMed ID: 18641251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lossy three-dimensional JPEG2000 compression of abdominal CT images: assessment of the visually lossless threshold and effect of compression ratio on image quality.
    Ringl H; Schernthaner RE; Kulinna-Cosentini C; Weber M; Schaefer-Prokop C; Herold CJ; Schima W
    Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):467-74. PubMed ID: 17890355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. JPEG2000 3D compression vs. 2D compression: an assessment of artifact amount and computing time in compressing thin-section abdomen CT images.
    Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Richter T; Kang HS; Kim SY; Kim YH; Seo J
    Med Phys; 2009 Mar; 36(3):835-44. PubMed ID: 19378744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Advantage in image fidelity and additional computing time of JPEG2000 3D in comparison to JPEG2000 in compressing abdomen CT image datasets of different section thicknesses.
    Lee H; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Park S; Seo J; Shin YG; Kim B
    Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4238-48. PubMed ID: 20879584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of perceptible artifacts in JPEG2000 compressed abdomen CT images using a perceptual image quality metric.
    Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Mantiuk R; Bajpai V; Kim TJ; Kim YH; Yoon CJ; Hahn S
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Mar; 15(3):314-25. PubMed ID: 18280929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting the fidelity of JPEG2000 compressed CT images using DICOM header information.
    Kim KJ; Kim B; Lee H; Choi H; Jeon JJ; Ahn JH; Lee KH
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6449-57. PubMed ID: 22149828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of image features in predicting visually lossless thresholds of JPEG2000 compressed body CT images: initial trial.
    Kim KJ; Kim B; Lee KH; Mantiuk R; Richter T; Kang HS
    Radiology; 2013 Sep; 268(3):710-8. PubMed ID: 23630311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. JPEG2000 2D and 3D reversible compressions of thin-section chest CT images: improving compressibility by increasing data redundancy outside the body region.
    Kim KJ; Lee KH; Kim B; Richter T; Yun ID; Lee SU; Bae KT; Shim H
    Radiology; 2011 Apr; 259(1):271-7. PubMed ID: 21325033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. JPEG2000 compression of thin-section CT images of the lung: effect of compression ratio on image quality.
    Ringl H; Schernthaner RE; Bankier AA; Weber M; Prokop M; Herold CJ; Schaefer-Prokop C
    Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):869-77. PubMed ID: 16868278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Artifacts in slab average-intensity-projection images reformatted from JPEG 2000 compressed thin-section abdominal CT data sets.
    Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Mantiuk R; Kim HR; Kim YH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jun; 190(6):W342-50. PubMed ID: 18492876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of perceptible artifacts in JPEG 2000-compressed chest CT images using mathematical and perceptual quality metrics.
    Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Mantiuk R; Hahn S; Kim TJ; Kim YH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):328-34. PubMed ID: 18212217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of JPEG2000 compression on detection of skull fractures.
    McEntee MF; Nikolovski I; Bourne R; Pietrzyk MW; Evanoff MG; Brennan PC; Tay KL
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Jun; 20(6):712-20. PubMed ID: 23664399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. JPEG 2000 compression of abdominal CT: difference in tolerance between thin- and thick-section images.
    Woo HS; Kim KJ; Kim TJ; Hahn S; Kim B; Kim YH; Lee KH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):535-41. PubMed ID: 17715097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of three image fidelity metrics of different computational principles for JPEG2000 compressed abdomen CT images.
    Kim KJ; Kim B; Mantiuk R; Richter T; Lee H; Kang HS; Seo J; Lee KH
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Aug; 29(8):1496-503. PubMed ID: 20529734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
    Singh S; Kalra MK; Hsieh J; Licato PE; Do S; Pien HH; Blake MA
    Radiology; 2010 Nov; 257(2):373-83. PubMed ID: 20829535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Free-response receiver operating characteristic evaluation of lossy JPEG2000 and object-based set partitioning in hierarchical trees compression of digitized mammograms.
    Penedo M; Souto M; Tahoces PG; Carreira JM; Villalón J; Porto G; Seoane C; Vidal JJ; Berbaum KS; Chakraborty DP; Fajardo LL
    Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):450-7. PubMed ID: 16244253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiation dose reduction with hybrid iterative reconstruction for pediatric CT.
    Singh S; Kalra MK; Shenoy-Bhangle AS; Saini A; Gervais DA; Westra SJ; Thrall JH
    Radiology; 2012 May; 263(2):537-46. PubMed ID: 22517962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study.
    Deák Z; Grimm JM; Treitl M; Geyer LL; Linsenmaier U; Körner M; Reiser MF; Wirth S
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):197-206. PubMed ID: 23169793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique.
    Prakash P; Kalra MK; Kambadakone AK; Pien H; Hsieh J; Blake MA; Sahani DV
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Apr; 45(4):202-10. PubMed ID: 20177389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiation dose reduction with Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction technique for abdominal computed tomography.
    Kalra MK; Woisetschläger M; Dahlström N; Singh S; Lindblom M; Choy G; Quick P; Schmidt B; Sedlmair M; Blake MA; Persson A
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 22592621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.