105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18641262)
21. Mammography and the risks of engagement.
Pentecost MJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Nov; 1(11):797-9. PubMed ID: 17411707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Re: "Mammography and the risks of engagement".
Goldshein M
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jan; 2(1):93-4. PubMed ID: 17411771
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Evidence-based target recall rates for screening mammography.
Schell MJ; Yankaskas BC; Ballard-Barbash R; Qaqish BF; Barlow WE; Rosenberg RD; Smith-Bindman R
Radiology; 2007 Jun; 243(3):681-9. PubMed ID: 17517927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts.
Del Turco MR; Mantellini P; Ciatto S; Bonardi R; Martinelli F; Lazzari B; Houssami N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Oct; 189(4):860-6. PubMed ID: 17885057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Age-related accuracy of screening mammography: how should it be measured?
Feig SA
Radiology; 2000 Mar; 214(3):633-40. PubMed ID: 10715022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Statistical power in breast cancer screening trials and mortality reduction among women 40-49 years of age with particular emphasis on the National Breast Screening Study of Canada.
Kopans DB; Halpern E; Hulka CA
Cancer; 1994 Aug; 74(4):1196-203. PubMed ID: 8055437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Importance of comparison of current and prior mammograms in breast cancer screening.
Roelofs AA; Karssemeijer N; Wedekind N; Beck C; van Woudenberg S; Snoeren PR; Hendriks JH; Rosselli del Turco M; Bjurstam N; Junkermann H; Beijerinck D; Séradour B; Evertsz CJ
Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 17185661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. American College of Radiology guidelines for breast cancer screening.
Feig SA; D'Orsi CJ; Hendrick RE; Jackson VP; Kopans DB; Monsees B; Sickles EA; Stelling CB; Zinninger M; Wilcox-Buchalla P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 9648758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Digital mammography: what next?
Pisano ED
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Aug; 3(8):583-5. PubMed ID: 17412132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Blinded comparison of computer-aided detection with human second reading in screening mammography.
Georgian-Smith D; Moore RH; Halpern E; Yeh ED; Rafferty EA; D'Alessandro HA; Staffa M; Hall DA; McCarthy KA; Kopans DB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Nov; 189(5):1135-41. PubMed ID: 17954651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A true screening environment for review of interval breast cancers: pilot study to reduce bias.
Gordon PB; Borugian MJ; Warren Burhenne LJ
Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):411-5. PubMed ID: 17848684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Use of mammography services by women enrolled in Medicare--United States, 1991-1993.
Oncology (Williston Park); 1995 Dec; 9(12):1287-8, 1300. PubMed ID: 8771103
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Significance of roentgen mammography for breast carcinoma screening].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Krämer S; Döinghaus K; Säbel M; Lang N; Bautz W
Rontgenpraxis; 1997 May; 50(5):103-9. PubMed ID: 9297252
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Status of mammography after the Digital Mammography Imaging Screening Trial: digital versus film.
Dershaw DD
Breast J; 2006; 12(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 16509833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Mammography screening for breast cancer. Reply to the commentaries.
Kopans DB; Halpern E; Hulka CA
Cancer; 1994 Aug; 74(4):1212-6. PubMed ID: 8055440
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Screening mammography: controversies and headlines.
Jackson VP
Radiology; 2002 Nov; 225(2):323-6. PubMed ID: 12409561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Mammography screening after breast cancer diagnosis in a first degree female relative: age group differences (United States).
Lemon SC; Zapka JG; Clemow L; Estabrook B; Fletcher K
Cancer Causes Control; 2006 Oct; 17(8):1053-65. PubMed ID: 16933056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [To the Editors: Comment on the study by Kullmann and Misset "Benefits of mammographic breast cancer screening"].
Laszlo T
Orv Hetil; 2010 Dec; 151(49):2032-3, discussion 2033-4.. PubMed ID: 21361059
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
