These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18641748)

  • 1. Reexamination of depolarization in lidar measurements.
    Gimmestad GG
    Appl Opt; 2008 Jul; 47(21):3795-802. PubMed ID: 18641748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of various linear depolarization parameters measured by lidar.
    Cairo F; Di Donfrancesco G; Adriani A; Pulvirenti L; Fierli F
    Appl Opt; 1999 Jul; 38(21):4425-32. PubMed ID: 18323927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Explicit description of polarization coupling in lidar applications.
    Hayman M; Thayer JP
    Opt Lett; 2009 Mar; 34(5):611-3. PubMed ID: 19252568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of multiple scattering on depolarization measurements with spaceborne lidars.
    Reichardt S; Reichardt J
    Appl Opt; 2003 Jun; 42(18):3620-33. PubMed ID: 12833968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Airborne polarized lidar detection of scattering layers in the ocean.
    Vasilkov AP; Goldin YA; Gureev BA; Hoge FE; Swift RN; Wright CW
    Appl Opt; 2001 Aug; 40(24):4353-64. PubMed ID: 18360476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-signal method for accurate measurements of depolarization ratio with lidar.
    Reichardt J; Baumgart R; McGee TJ
    Appl Opt; 2003 Aug; 42(24):4909-13. PubMed ID: 12952338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Water Cloud Detection with Circular Polarization Lidar: A Semianalytic Monte Carlo Simulation Approach.
    Ahmad W; Zhang K; Tong Y; Xiao D; Wu L; Liu D
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Feb; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 35214581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement of the lidar ratio for atmospheric aerosols with a 180 degrees backscatter nephelometer.
    Doherty SJ; Anderson TL; Charlson RJ
    Appl Opt; 1999 Mar; 38(9):1823-32. PubMed ID: 18305813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Novel polarization-sensitive micropulse lidar measurement technique.
    Flynn CJ; Mendoza A; Zheng Y; Mathur S
    Opt Express; 2007 Mar; 15(6):2785-90. PubMed ID: 19532516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the relationships between lidar integrated backscattered light and accumulated depolarization ratios for linear and circular polarization for water droplets, fog oil, and dust.
    Cao X; Roy G; Roy N; Bernier R
    Appl Opt; 2009 Jul; 48(21):4130-41. PubMed ID: 19623227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of an all-day portable polarization lidar system based on the division-of-focal-plane scheme for atmospheric polarization measurements.
    Kong Z; Ma T; Zheng K; Cheng Y; Gong Z; Hua D; Mei L
    Opt Express; 2021 Nov; 29(23):38512-38526. PubMed ID: 34808903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic error of lidar profiles caused by a polarization-dependent receiver transmission: quantification and error correction scheme.
    Mattis I; Tesche M; Grein M; Freudenthaler V; Müller D
    Appl Opt; 2009 May; 48(14):2742-51. PubMed ID: 19424398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Polarization properties of lidar scattering from clouds at 347 nm and 694 nm.
    Pal SR; Carswell AI
    Appl Opt; 1978 Aug; 17(15):2321-8. PubMed ID: 20203781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of particle concentration and bulk characteristics on polarized oceanographic lidar measurements.
    Collister BL; Zimmerman RC; Sukenik CI; Balch WM; Hill VJ
    Limnol Oceanogr; 2022 Jun; 67(6):1374-1387. PubMed ID: 36248249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of stratospheric sulfuric Acid aerosols with polarization lidar: theory, simulations, and observations.
    Beyerle G
    Appl Opt; 2000 Sep; 39(27):4994-5000. PubMed ID: 18350097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-wavelength polarization Scheimpflug lidar system developed for remote sensing of atmospheric aerosols.
    Kong Z; Ma T; Chen K; Gong Z; Mei L
    Appl Opt; 2019 Nov; 58(31):8612-8621. PubMed ID: 31873345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Four-component polarization measurement of lidar atmospheric scattering.
    Houston JD; Carswell AI
    Appl Opt; 1978 Feb; 17(4):614-20. PubMed ID: 20197836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Polarization lidar observations of backscatter phase matrices from oriented ice crystals and rain.
    Hayman M; Spuler S; Morley B
    Opt Express; 2014 Jul; 22(14):16976-90. PubMed ID: 25090513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ice clouds and Asian dust studied with lidar measurements of particle extinction-to-backscatter ratio, particle depolarization, and water-vapor mixing ratio over Tsukuba.
    Sakai T; Nagai T; Nakazato M; Mano Y; Matsumura T
    Appl Opt; 2003 Dec; 42(36):7103-16. PubMed ID: 14717284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Method for reconstructing atmospheric optical parameters from the data of polarization lidar sensing.
    Samoilova SV; Balin YS; Krekova MM; Winker DM
    Appl Opt; 2005 Jun; 44(17):3499-509. PubMed ID: 16007848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.