These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18641998)

  • 1. Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings.
    Andersson I; Ikeda DM; Zackrisson S; Ruschin M; Svahn T; Timberg P; Tingberg A
    Eur Radiol; 2008 Dec; 18(12):2817-25. PubMed ID: 18641998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The diagnostic accuracy of dual-view digital mammography, single-view breast tomosynthesis and a dual-view combination of breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography in a free-response observer performance study.
    Svahn T; Andersson I; Chakraborty D; Svensson S; Ikeda D; Förnvik D; Mattsson S; Tingberg A; Zackrisson S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):113-7. PubMed ID: 20228048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast tomosynthesis: Accuracy of tumor measurement compared with digital mammography and ultrasonography.
    Förnvik D; Zackrisson S; Ljungberg O; Svahn T; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Apr; 51(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 20105090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.
    Zackrisson S; Lång K; Rosso A; Johnson K; Dustler M; Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Sartor H; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging.
    Gong X; Glick SJ; Liu B; Vedula AA; Thacker S
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1041-52. PubMed ID: 16696481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus mammography and breast ultrasound: a multireader performance study.
    Thibault F; Dromain C; Breucq C; Balleyguier CS; Malhaire C; Steyaert L; Tardivon A; Baldan E; Drevon H
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Sep; 23(9):2441-9. PubMed ID: 23673573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of diagnostic accuracy.
    Svahn TM; Chakraborty DP; Ikeda D; Zackrisson S; Do Y; Mattsson S; Andersson I
    Br J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 85(1019):e1074-82. PubMed ID: 22674710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast Cancer Conspicuity on Simultaneously Acquired Digital Mammographic Images versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images.
    Korhonen KE; Conant EF; Cohen EA; Synnestvedt M; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP
    Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 31084481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic accuracy and recall rates for digital mammography and digital mammography combined with one-view and two-view tomosynthesis: results of an enriched reader study.
    Rafferty EA; Park JM; Philpotts LE; Poplack SP; Sumkin JH; Halpern EF; Niklason LT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Feb; 202(2):273-81. PubMed ID: 24450665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital Mammography versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Impact of Breast Density on Diagnostic Performance in Population-based Screening.
    Østerås BH; Martinsen ACT; Gullien R; Skaane P
    Radiology; 2019 Oct; 293(1):60-68. PubMed ID: 31407968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis--initial experiences.
    Tingberg A; Förnvik D; Mattsson S; Svahn T; Timberg P; Zackrisson S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):180-3. PubMed ID: 21733859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visibility of microcalcification clusters and masses in breast tomosynthesis image volumes and digital mammography: a 4AFC human observer study.
    Timberg P; Baath M; Andersson I; Mattsson S; Tingberg A; Ruschin M
    Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2431-7. PubMed ID: 22559613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of reduced breast compression in breast tomosynthesis: human observer study using clinical cases.
    Förnvik D; Andersson I; Svahn T; Timberg P; Zackrisson S; Tingberg A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):118-23. PubMed ID: 20228049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic value of the stand-alone synthetic image in digital breast tomosynthesis examinations.
    Garayoa J; Chevalier M; Castillo M; Mahillo-Fernández I; Amallal El Ouahabi N; Estrada C; Tejerina A; Benitez O; Valverde J
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):565-572. PubMed ID: 28812190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of prior mammograms on combined reading of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Kim WH; Chang JM; Koo HR; Seo M; Bae MS; Lee J; Moon WK
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):148-155. PubMed ID: 27178032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Parenchymal texture analysis in digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer risk estimation: a preliminary study.
    Kontos D; Bakic PR; Carton AK; Troxel AB; Conant EF; Maidment AD
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):283-98. PubMed ID: 19201357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two-view and single-view tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: high-resolution X-ray imaging observer study.
    Wallis MG; Moa E; Zanca F; Leifland K; Danielsson M
    Radiology; 2012 Mar; 262(3):788-96. PubMed ID: 22274840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In-plane visibility of lesions using breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography.
    Timberg P; Båth M; Andersson I; Mattsson S; Tingberg A; Ruschin M
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5618-26. PubMed ID: 21158273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automated Breast Density Computation in Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Influence on Mean Glandular Dose and BIRADS Density Categorization.
    Castillo-García M; Chevalier M; Garayoa J; Rodriguez-Ruiz A; García-Pinto D; Valverde J
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):802-810. PubMed ID: 28214227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography for detecting and characterising invasive lobular cancers: a multi-reader study.
    Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Zuiani C; Martincich L; Londero V; Caramia E; Clauser P; Campanino PP; Regini E; Luparia A; Castellano I; Bergamasco L; Sapino A; Fonio P; Bazzocchi M; Gandini G
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Sep; 71(9):889-95. PubMed ID: 27210245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.